Thursday, August 31, 2006

A Slender Rosie...


With all of the photo-shopping going on lately, it seems that Rosie O'Donnell was the next most likely candidate. Katie Couric looked great in her new pictures, and Al-Reuters and the New York Times have been doing it for years.

It's a great picture. I'm glad that it doesn't endanger any lives or blame America or George Bush first. In fact, Rosie says she likes the picture.

Here's wishing Rosie O'Donnell and The View a great season in 2006-2007.

God Bless Don Rumsfeld

In the midst of the worst attack on any public figure in recent history, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld gave a stunning speech on Monday further explaining and defining the current events in Iraq. He received little coverage for the speech with the exception of incessant, liberal sniping for being political. Wow! The liberal elites who manipulate the media every day are calling an American who has spent a large part of his adult life in resplendent service to our nation a hypocrite. Smarmy news bimbos get to mislead the public about the war while calling Mr. Rumsfeld a hypocrite. While Rumsfeld and the men and women of our armed forces fight terrorism, these people blame America for everything wrong with the world. After all, Jack Murtha said that we created the terrorists.

Secretary Rumsfeld’s articulate words speak for the entire conservative movement at this point.

I'm not one to put much faith in opinion polls. But the other day, I came across an interesting set of statistics that I want to mention. It seems that the Pew Research Center asked opinion leaders in the United States their views of the prospects for a stable democracy in Iraq. Here were some of the results: 63% of people in the news media thought the enterprise would fail. So did 71% of people in the foreign affairs establishment and 71% in academic settings or think tanks.

Interestingly, opinion leaders from the U.S. military are optimistic about Iraq by a margin of 64% to 32%. And so is the American public, by a margin of 56% to 37%. And the Iraqi people are also optimistic. I've seen this demonstrated repeatedly--in public opinion polls, in the turnout for the elections, and that tips to authorities from ordinary Iraqis have grown from 483 to 4,700 tips in a month.

This prompts the question: Which view of Iraq is more accurate? The pessimistic view of so-called elites in our country--or the optimism expressed by millions of Iraqis and by the roughly 158,000 troops on the ground? But, most important is the question: why should Iraq's success or failure matter to the American people? I'd like to address these questions today.


Secretary Rumsfeld concludes with these comments:

"So I suggest to editors and reporters--whose good intentions I take for granted--to do some soul searching. To ask: how will history judge--if it does--the reporting decades from now when Iraq's path is settled?
I would urge us all to make every effort to ensure we are telling the whole story. To take a moment for self-reflection and reassessment.

Further it is worth noting that there are 158,000 Americans in uniform who are sending e-mails back to friends and families, telling them the truth as they see it. And much of it is different than what those in the United States are seeing and reading about every day
Our country is waging a battle unlike any other in history. We are waging it in a media age unlike any that war fighters have ever known. In this new century, we all need to make adjustments--in government and in the media. And change is hard.

But to paraphrase Thomas Jefferson, we are all Republicans. We are all Democrats. We are all Americans. We are all in this together. And what we do today will not only impact us, but our children and our grandchildren, and the kind of world they will live in. "

God Bless Don Rumsfeld!

Neal Boortz on TV

The always wonderful MsUnderestimated has up two exquisite posts this morning that provide detail on the brainless dribble of some folks on cable news. Tucker Carlson’s latest pathetic attempt at a news show has a segment called “three on three.” I wish we had video like so many other blogs.

I just happened to see this part of his show on Wednesday afternoon when Tucker was “interviewing” his three guests: Jerry Springer, the always hateful and creepy Jennie Backus, and libertarian Neal Boortz. There is little wonder why Tucker Carlson is a failure. He is one of two or three faux conservatives who provide a slight veneer on the otherwise liberal façade at MSNBC. Both Tucker and Joe Scarborough are huge disappointments as anchors and as conservatives. These two gentlemen don’t even do a good job posing as anchormen or conservatives any longer.

Anyway, as MsUnderestimated demonstrates in her commentary and video, that the “three on three” segment was completely ridiculous. Tucker has no concept of balancing the time between his guests, and he seems to be compelled to argue with every conservative as he tries to prove his independence to the authorities at NBC. Tucker joined in on shouting down Neal with Jennie and Jerry. When given his few seconds to talk, Neal made some excellent points.

Jenny and Jerry are obviously both accustomed to and enjoy shout fests, and Jerry showed why his syndicated spectacle is always a frenzied mess without any useful purpose to an intellectual pursuit of living. It is amazing that in our free society that anyone would consider having Jerry Springer on as a guest commentator for any political or international affairs topic. It would seem that Mr. Springer would have forfeited any credibility by hosting that trash talking, tabloid sickening circus for the last ten years.

MSNBC and the low rated, disgraceful performance of Tucker Carlson are barely worth a comment. At least Ms U. was able to make the entire episode entertaining. Stop by and check her out-she’s got a great news site with precious commentary and useful insight.

Wednesday, August 30, 2006

Well, Well, Well, It's Armitage-Not Rove, Cheney, or Libby...What Now...

Although it has been known and reported for some time, The Wall Street Journal today made the news very mainstream: the entire Valerie Plame identity scandal was nothing more than a media obsession with a crime that NEVER existed.
From its very start, the ballyhooed case of who leaked the name of CIA analyst Valerie Plame to columnist Robert Novak has been drenched in partisan politics and media hypocrisy. The more we learn, however, the more it also reveals about the internal dysfunction of the Bush Administration and the lack of loyalty among some of its most senior officials.In other words, the leaker wasn't Karl Rove or Scooter Libby or anyone else in the White House who has been accused of running a conspiracy against Ms. Plame as revenge for her husband Joe Wilson's false accusations against the White House's case for war with Iraq. So what have the last three years been all about anyway? Political opportunism and internal score-settling, among other things.
While conspiracy theories can be used to weave an intricate plotline, the wild-eyed, totally contrived theories promulgated by liberals and their willing accomplices in the media are finally exposed as the deceitful heresy that has become the foundation of the democrat party. If democrats plan to use these fabricated mantras as Fall campaign slogans, the November elections should prove to be very entertaining.

Although Richard Armitage has been outed as the source for the original Rober Novak column, we must remember that there is not now, nor has the ever been a crime committed against Valerie Plame or the United States government. It has been well established the Plame was not an undercover employee any longer, and in any case, she had already outed herself publicly many times over. We explained this in a detailed post on October 23, 2005.

"So, here is what we have. Valerie Plame uses here married name, her cover name, working at the CIA front company called Brewster-Jennings & Associates, contributes $1,000 to the Gore campaign. The media spins this as a revelation resulting from the Novak article-and of course, Karl Rove. But, this is not what this shows. What this shows is that Valerie Plame blew her own cover because she contributed to the campaign of Gore under the same name that she used for her undercover, her married name, and the name of a CIA front company that she worker for. So, Valerie Plame violates who knows what other kinds of protocol using her undercover name, exposing the existence of a CIA front company and all of this is totally ignored because supposedly her name was leaked and that is how people noticed. Now, this is a clever, clever attempt to try to spin the as she didn't do anything wrong. Why is it perfectly normal for an American and CIA agent to contribute and want to contribute to the Gore campaign."



Also, often lost in the devious, democrat, demagoguery parroted by the mainstream media for more than three years is the fact that every assertion by Joe Wilson (aka Clown Wilson) has been proven indisputably false.

"ON JULY 22, 2005, the New York Times published a lengthy, front-page article detailing the work of two senior Bush administration officials, Karl Rove and Scooter Libby, on the Niger-uranium story. A seemingly exhaustive timeline ran alongside the piece. In 19 bullet points, the Times provided its readers in considerable detail with what it regarded as the highlights of the story. The timeline traces events from the initial request for more information on the alleged Iraqi inquiries in Africa to Joseph Wilson's trip to Niger; from the now-famous "16 words" in President Bush's 2003 State of the Union to the details of White House telephone logs; from Bush administration claims that Karl Rove was not involved in the leak to the naming of special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, and on from there to the dates that White House officials testified before the grand jury.
As I say, seemingly exhaustive. But there is one curious omission: July 7, 2004. On that date, the bipartisan Senate Select Intelligence Committee released a 511-page report on the intelligence that served as the foundation for the Bush administration's case for war in Iraq. The Senate report includes a 48-page section on Wilson that demonstrates, in painstaking detail, that virtually everything Joseph Wilson said publicly about his trip, from its origins to his conclusions, was false."

Only a media culture in which Bush hatred has become the psychotic, impenetrable template for news could produce news stories that make Wilson appear at all credible. The mainstream media continued today to focus on their own irresponsible vendetta while missing the two key elements of this episode.

Since the embarrassing revelation, the Paul Begala wing of the liberal party has been strangely silent. When any of these strident voices fall silent on any topic, it means more than an admission of defeat, it means that further discussion of the tired issue might endanger Ned Lamont or some other current “cut and run” darling of the extreme left. Valerie Plame and Clown Wilson must be sitting at home feeling like a used woman: they were paid for their services and discarded afterwards.

Others on this topic: Rhymes with Right, Donklephant, Mike's Noise has a Fabulous post.
InstaPundit, GOP Bloggers. Not-A-Pundit.

Mark Levin weighs in..

Huber Heights Teacher's Strike: Media Circus

As we previously stated at Thespis Journal, things aren’t always as they appear to be in the mainstream media.-especially in a strike situation. Although the Dayton News stations have made valiant attempts to cover the news radiating from Huber Heights, these mainstream media outlets have lived up their nickname of being the “drive-by” media. Sketchy facts and supported by sound snippets and finished off with remarks from anchor people who have no idea what might be actually transpiring. All three of the newscasts led their 11:00pm Tuesday telecasts with the news of the “forced” federal mediation taking place in Columbus today. Each of the three networks also foolishly sounded a clarion call that school might resume on Thursday, August 31. While school could resume on Thursday, it seems unlikely, and the real news coming from Huber Heights had nothing to do with school resuming on Thursday or any other day in the near future.

The Huber Heights Education Association has repeatedly requested to return to the table. The hapless Superintendent Kirby seemed to think that he would force the teacher’s to return to the table and forfeit their right to strike. He still seems intent on having the strike declared illegal, yet he has never explained to the public the benefit of having this strike declared illegal. Absent an agreement on a new master contract, the teachers could strike again with a new ten notice, and the district could experience another several days or weeks of turmoil.

Without a doubt, every member of HHEA is thrilled that talks are taking place today. True professionals would always rather be with their students teaching and learning. The blame for the interruption of school lies with Superintendent Kirby, his team and his board. Their failure to bring closure to the process has earned him the distinction of being idiot of the week. Kirby has spent more than a week worried about the legality of the strike. He should have been worried about getting students and teachers back in school.

A lot of the current crisis has been brought about as a result of an alternative Mutually Agree Dispute Resolution Procedure (MAD). Both sides agreed to a legally binding change in the procedure. In a pattern that he established in his previous district in Indiana, Mr. Kirby could not abide by his own agreement. He is very familiar with contracts not being settled since the teachers in his last school district worked for two years without a contract. Kirby brought this baggage with him to Huber Heights. Kirby’s tarnished history with labor relations demonstrates what we have been saying all along: the Superintendent is at the center of all that is wrong in the Huber Heights crisis.

Hopefully, the talks went well today. The football team was practicing, so all is well in the district. Prior to Wednesday, all co-curricular and extra-curricular activities had stopped. Surely, the pressure to settle a contract must be enormous. Parents should be demanding to get their students back in school. School may be in session yet this week. While it is a guessing game, Mr. Kirby’s history and blatant disregard for his teachers and his lack of integrity may cause a longer strike than the mainstream media wants us to believe. It seems like the real question to some is the status of the football game on Friday night.

The Dayton Daily News has more.
Detroit Schools Show Down: Teachers on Strike
Perkins Teachers are on Strike too. More on the Perkins Strike

Tuesday, August 29, 2006

The 82nd Carnival of Education

Welcome to the 82nd Edition of the Carnival of Education
Special Theatrical Edition
Featuring Articles submitted from across the Edusphere


Have you ever had a day, a week, a month, or an entire school year when you thought it would be appropriate for your students, colleagues, or administrators to form the cast of a Broadway play or musical? Do you sometimes find yourself in melodramatic episodes that could be written into a fully formed script or libretto? If so….read on…

Thespis Journal is proud to present education articles from a panoramic view across the horizon of teaching and learning. You might want to play some music from Phantom of the Opera, Annie, Gypsy, Hairspray, or even Wicked as accompaniment for your trip to the Great White Way.

I am expressing my sincere apology to each of you in advance for the lack of parallel structure in the outline of these posts.

Scott Elliott at Get on the Bus will host next weeks carnival. Submissions are due to Scott next Tuesday, September 5 by 9:00pm. EDT. Send your submissions to scemel@aol.com.

Leading Actor...


From the Trenches of Public Education takes a leading role in today’s theatrical carnival with his post, The Right to Burn the Flag and Shoot Ourselves in the Foot. The fine line between innovative lesson demonstrations and public perceptions of our work is carefully explored by Mr. Fermoyle. You might want to check out the book In The Trenches.


The Textbook Evaluator has a great post relative to the marketing and creation of textbooks. There is true expertise in his post.
“Let me be clear, however. I am not against textbooks, nor do I have it in for the big textbook publishers. I do not support the radical decentralization of instructional decisions to individual classroom teachers. My general beef with instructional materials is NOT the materials themselves. My frustration is that the structure of the market for educational materials does not reward innovation, does not reward effectiveness, and does not lead to general improvements in student performance.”

At Texas Ed (a voice from outside public education), there is a powerfully worded, well conceived post about the over-valuation of football coaches in Texas. It’s hard to argue with T-Ed’s reasoning.

The Education Wonks award The Knucklehead of the Day. You have to read the post-the driver is truly a bonehead.

D-Ed Reckoning has a post regarding clueless newspaper reporting.

Ms. Cornelius at A Shrewdness of Apes wins a Tony Award for her leading role in being the most theme appropriate this week when she writes, When Teaching School is like a Divine Comedy. How did she know we needed a comedy, and it's only the second week of school?

The King And I...

In the 1951 Rodgers and Hammerstein classic the King and I, the King of Siam rules with infinite authority making all decisions: Mrs. Anna teaches the King’s numerous children.

The King’s Choice:

In this touching and revealing post at Meri Musings, the author tells of taking her daughter to the first day of kindergarten.

The American Spectator
has a thoughtful and instructive post “No Sex Please: We’re Teenagers.”

Right Wing Nation takes Educration and Liberalism to task. They invented the term, go there for the instruction. No doubt, Right Wing Nation would have no tolerance for the King's dictatorship.

Mrs. Anna’s Lessons:

The Author of Teaching in the Twenty-First Century quotes the most well-known lyrics sung by Mrs. Anna in The King And I. The very appropriately titled post is “Getting to Know You."

It’s a very ancient saying,
But a true and honest thought,
That if you become a teacher,
By your pupils you’ll be taught.

There’s nothing to Teach
is the title of a post at Supreme Narcissism. The post explores the debate over teaching “intelligent design,” and the pitfalls of sex education.

Sex education from a different perspective is featured in an astute post at NYC Educator. NYC Educator titles the post: Forget Merit Pay!

Mrs. Anna must have some very difficult lessons to teach the children of Siam these days because Jon Swift takes an off-beat view of funding for subjects like science and the like. Swift’s sarcastic wit could be put to good use at our school.

Diane Weir has a lesson for all of us on being an advocate for pre-schoolers vs. being an advocate for preschool. This pungent post is worth it for all of us as a reminder to keep the kids needs first.

The History Boys...
(The 2006 Tony Award for best new play)

There’s a Colorado Flag update at Millard Fillmore’s bathtub.

The Good Human has more on the Colorado flag incident. This is a great post with several links.

A History Teacher says "They Don't Get It, We Can Help." I hope that this History Teacher gets to see History Boys.

From History is Elementary: What is it Going to Take -a wonderful post on motivation.


Wicked...
(The 2003 smash hit featuring songs of the legendary Stephen Schwartz. Wicked is a prequel to The Wizard of Oz, and is noticeably more inspired and artistic.)

Scheiss Weekly has a post for us that reminds me of Elphaba, that Wicked Witch of the West: Fire burn and cauldron bubble; That one witch is rambling again.

I keep saying this but here it is again: There are certain skills that intelligent persons simply must have, at certain ages. When one becomes a self-sustaining adult, (which status of course many 'adults' never attain because their families and they themselves allowed them to go through school without doing or learning anything!!!) (My SELF ESTEEM!!!!!!) a decent person will be armed with skills, marketable skills, with which to earn one's own living.
Alexander at This Week in Education writes about the rate of Blogging, and the appropriate number of posts for an education blogger. There are two week totals of posts from several prominent education blogs and a comparison chart. This is Wicked good.

Edspresso has a salty posting in which they respond to commentary and concerns from AFT members.

NCLB Let's Get It Right pours the java right back in Wicked fashion to Edspresso. These two bloggers could create and intriguing plotline to watch at the theater.

One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest...
The Tony Award winning play by Dale Wasserman that explores a ward of mentally challenged patients. Cuckoo’s Nest is a compelling drama, and a famous movie circa 1975.

Campus Watch has an article filled with additional information regarding the use of the popular site Facebook as a coping technique relative to the tragedies at Virginia Tech.

Going to the Mat has a detailed post with analysis regarding Principal Signing Bonuses In Maryland: Incentive without Insurance. Like many concerned citizens today, Matt demands accountability measures that accompany the pay incentives.

At Get Lost Mr. Chips, the author tells a tale about the first day of school that had to make the teachers believe they were starring in One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest.

Children of Eden...

This post reminds me of the show-stopping musical number Generations from the Stephen Schwartz musical Children of Eden. What It’s Like on the Inside has a post regarding the class of 2010. Warning: this might make seasoned educators feel as though you have been teaching for Generations.

Chris Quimby illustrates that there is no back to school for homeschoolers and boasts about the advantages of home schooling in a poetic treatise called Back To School.

Online Charter Schools are not synonomis with Home Schooling! Spunky Home School has quite an essay on this topic, and she's right! I'm not sure what qualifies an online charter as a school. (This is an editor's choice article.)

Trivium Pursuit Blog has information on Vitruvius in for home schooling.

Creative Home Schooling Is Thinking Out of The Box boasts of a success on a standardized test for a home schooled child. Way to go!

Sometimes it is better to do nothing! Read all about it in Paul's Tips.

The Pajama Game...
In this 1954 musical, the workers at the Sleep Tite Pajama Factory are about to go on strike for a pay raise.

Scott says the Huber Heights Strike is difficult to handicap. Thespis says that Superintendent Kirby needs to lead. Best wishes to the Huber Heights, Ohio teachers who are fighting for teachers wages and rights for local teachers and teachers across Ohio!


Featured Actor...

Scott Elliot at Get on the Bus has a caution for teachers-especially teachers of primary grade children-regarding overly complex and demanding school supply lists. Scott has a point about public perceptions regarding alternative agendas being promoted through the very specific supply list.

The Hall Monitor also has new ways of acquiring school supplies.

The Workplace Prof Blog has an insightful post on age discrimination in the hiring and promotion of adjunct faculty members.

Where are the students in the National Standards Debate is a question posed and answered by Poor, Starving College Student.

Ms_Teacher is shaking her head in disbelief at grade level promotions. I thought NCLB was supposed to solve all of these issues.

At Discourse About Discourse, the author talks about metawriting and best and worst writing prompts. This featured performer asks for feedback about the performance.

Anonymous Educator posts on the topic of internet addiction for students and battling this internet addiction.

The Jill Carroll Story comes from The Current Events in Education from an extremely creative and imaginative teacher. There are even lesson ideas; how wonderful!

A Teacher from New York
spending a year in Turkey sends in the latest report.

In a timely post the HunBlog provides an update on Katrina's Aftermath on Education.

How To Succeed in Business Without Really Trying...
The 1962 Tony-Award Winning Best Musical

Matt Inglot shares secrets with college students regarding starting their own business. Success Points for Starting A Business as a Student could make you a millionaire by age 40!

Peter Pan...

Scheiss Weekly has a wonderful post about her confused experiences with a teacher and the novel for children, Peter Pan. This is a fascinating post. You might want to think of the marvelous Jule Styne music, Never land Waltz as you are reading.

Applause! Applause! Thanks for visiting the special theatrical edition of the Carnival of Education. See you on the midway next week!

Check out the Carnival of Education Archives.

Check out the Mudville Gazette on the naming of a school
.
A Post on Guest Blogging at Junkyard Blog
The Conservative Cat

Kirby's Latest Fumble

Superintendent William Kirby seems like he has done it again! He has proven that he is inept at utilizing two of the most fundamental management techniques in a strike situation. If he manages the Huber Heights Schools so recklessly on a daily basis, there is little wonder why the district is facing this crisis.

Kirby should be using his time to facilitate a settlement in the on-going dispute. All of the efforts of Kirby and his negotiating team should be directed at bringing closure to the conflict. Students need to be in school, and they deserve competent teachers who are in the classroom eager to teach and mentor all the young people in the Huber Heights Schools.

Instead Kirby is playing classic games, yet he obviously has no skill or expertise in forcing a settlement. His efforts appear bumbling at best, and totally mean-spirited at worst. First, according to the Tuesday edition of the Dayton Daily News, Kirby admits to having tried (unsuccessfully) to intimidate his teachers with the threat of canceling their health insurance. He says that the law requires that the benefits be canceled. Kirby's statement is blatantly false. The Board of Education can continue to pay for the benefits if they choose to do so. Most boards do not in a strike situation. Kirby should be man enough to own up to his decision to threaten his teachers and agitate this situation.

Secondly, Kirby has still not made good on his threat to file with the State Employment Relations Board to have the strike declared illegal. Any idiot could have filed that complaint on Friday of last week. Apparently Mr. Kirby's incessant talking about the filing is all that has happened. Surely the public must wonder about Kirby's leadership abilities: it is now Tuesday, and Mr. Kirby and his board have yet to file the concern that has seemed to be the center piece of their strategy to settle the strike. Kirby has been talking about having the strike declared illegal for more than a week. The flaws of Kirby's ridiculous plan are exposed here.

Superintendent Kirby seems to lack the motivation to settle the strike. Obviously, the circumstances of the work stoppage have overwhelmed him. Perhaps it's time for someone else to take the leadership role to get the Huber Heights community through this situation.

Monday, August 28, 2006

Superintendent Continues Delay Tactics


One has to wonder if Superintendent William Kirby has any intentions of ever settling a contract with his teachers. According to the Dayton Daily News, Kirby plans to spend the day today trying to penalize and outmaneuver the teachers instead of talking with them. While refusing to engage a federal mediator, Kirby and his fellow administrators are playing legal games again. Kirby appears willing to invest time in arguing over semantics and trivialities rather than get his teachers and students back in school.

One has to wonder how long this hapless leader will allow this drama to play on.
Lots of other links from the Dayton Daily News.

Sunday, August 27, 2006

True Leadership Needed in Huber Heights Strike

While Superintendent William Kirby and his highly paid negotiators spend valuable time worrying about the legality of the teacher’s strike, he and his team could be using their time to foster and promote a settlement that will get the students back to school permanently. The Huber Heights teachers, students, and community deserve more from a man who is supposed to be the educational leader of the community. Kirby seems to have a propensity to focus on trivialities while the community senses a crisis. He displayed a bizarre brand of intellectual bankruptcy when he placed last week’s football game above the fundamental educational needs of the students in the Huber Heights schools. The Huber Heights students and teachers deserve more. Those involved in Huber Heights schools deserve a productive year with a singular focus on teaching and learning; however Mr. Kirby appears to be more concerned with the possibility of a temporary victory that would be nothing more than a band-aid on a gushing wound.

Every time that we see Mr. Kirby in the news or read about him in the newspaper, he is touting his effort to have the strike by the local OEA affiliate declared illegal. Kirby behaves as if the state employment relations board declaring the strike illegal would make the whole situation evaporate. His thinking represents nothing more than a simplistic myth. Teachers would retain their right to strike, and would no doubt file another notice, and be on strike again within a matter of days.

Kirby’s lame move to the State Employment Relations Board followed his pathetic attempt to get the press and the public interested in his blizzard of paperwork which amounted to administrative propaganda regarding the current state of bargaining. Surely, he must have been hoping that if he, acting as deity, could let the teachers know his “final offer” that the teachers would sense his warm personality and melt in their resolve to achieve a fair and equitable settlement. Kirby may have hoped that teachers would shrink from the challenge and be afraid to strike. Friday must have been a harsh reality check for Mr. Kirby.

There’s obviously a lot going on in the Huber Heights teacher’s strike than we are seeing and reading in the mainstream media. There are always many factors at work behind the scenes which are not witnessed by the media or the union members. What is public, however, is Kirby’s determination to keep the district solvent in the years ahead, without regard for the interim stability of the district. A rigid philosophy, holding the financial bottom line above all other factors will not produce an effective district. A truly creative, imaginative leadership team must think beyond the unencumbered balance of the district for fiscal year 2010. Most Ohio school districts are fortunate if they have a fiscal management plan that extends further than two years. By allowing a narrowly defined fiscal policy to control every decision, Kirby has allowed controversy to erupt in the Huber Heights community, and has exposed the district to a level of scrutiny that raises the negative perception of the district in the mind of average voters. Kirby will live to regret all of the circumstances which led to this strike.

In the meantime, it is incumbent on Kirby to get his negotiators back to the table to meet with the Union representatives. Non-stop negotiations should begin immediately. The administration/board side must show some flexibility. Clearly there are resources to produce a settlement that is more attractive than the so-called final offer. It is a little shocking that the administration would resort to the obsolete technique of releasing a “last offer” unless their intent was to implement the offer (forcing the teachers to accept it), and to inflame an already strained process. Kirby seems to have excelled at both of these goals.

A leader must lead, and Kirby has seemed more like a professional whiner than a dynamic leader who can facilitate a solution in this current situation. Superintendent Kirby should lead the way back to the table, and join his teacher’s in a collaborative effort to construct a fair settlement sometime early this week. It’s time to stop playing the games that he has obviously been playing for several months.

Read more in the Dayton Daily News here, here, here, and here.

Kathie Bracy has more.


Ghost Light: Posts of the Week


The drive-by media is trying their best to convince us today that the only story this week is the anniversary of Katrina. Please! There are lots of other interesting news stories and commentary available. Enjoy, and keep the ghost light on.

Seth at Hard Astarboard pokes fun at the democrats for their agenda for the Fall campaign: A War on Wal-Mart. Now, that is laughable!


Dr. Sanity has her weekly "Carnival of the Insanities." You'll enjoy it.

Gull at
Perish The Thought has new insights claiming that Kofi Annan has softened his stance against Israel.

The Buzz Blog has the weekly
Fair Tax Blogburst. Keep the Fair Tax Alive!

The Education Wonks are tracking the travels and commentary of Margaret Spellings again. It must a terrible life to have to travel the world defending the NCLB legislation.

Mr. McNamar has a great post at The Daily Grind called Whaddya Wanna Bet.

Blue Crab Boulevard tells the story of 128 Hammond, Indiana students suspended on the first day of school for dress code violations.

Joanne Jacobs has information that debunks the cry for more and more P.E.

Scott Ellioit at
Get on the Bus has a list of MSM Education Bloggers.

AJ Strata has a short column on Liberal Whiners.

Hot Air reports again on Britan's George Galloway and his moonbat views of the world. He should get over here quick and campaign with Nutty Ned!

They're Alive, Safe, and Free


Fox News is reporting that Steve Centanni and Olaf Wiig are safe and free. Everyone is thankful for the release of these two inncocent journalists. So many bloggers kept the story from being forgtotten, and the outcome is a welcome relief. You can watch and listen to Centanni with Shepherd Smith on Fox News this morning. Centanni is was very emotional and relieved. May God Bless these men and their families. Only Centanni, Wiig, and their families understand the meaning of this ordeal.

Fox News has the video and all the news.

Previous post
, and links. Michelle Malkin has more.

Right Winged tells of the forced conversion to Islam. MsUnderestimated has her usual comprehensive coverage.

Check out Blue Crab Boulevard

Saturday, August 26, 2006

Shame, shame, shame!

Shame, shame, shame! The shame is on visiting Judge Gary McKinley for turning the tables on justice, teaching, and common decency in Kenton, Ohio.

This is almost unbelievable. I say “almost unbelievable” because, if you have witnessed the emphasis that most administrators place on school athletic teams, it is not difficult to believe this sad circumstance. It seems that a local judge believes football to be more important than teaching a life lesson, more important than upholding the intent of the law, and more important than the lives of two young men. The Toledo Blade provides a summary of the story with some editorial content.
And then there are the victims, two blameless young men who are left with disabling injuries and the distinct impression that what happened to them matters less than the future of those who committed the thoughtless act.
In what apparently was supposed to be a prank, the Kenton boys stole a deer decoy and put it in the middle of a road last November so they could watch as motorists swerved to avoid it.
One driver, Robert Roby, Jr., crashed his car, suffering a broken neck, collar bone, arm, and leg. Now 19, he faces his 11th surgery to repair those injuries. His passenger, Dustin Zachariah, 18, wasn't as fortunate. He has brain damage.
The perpetrators, Dailyn Campbell, 16, and Jesse Howard, 17, pleaded no contest to charges of vehicular vandalism and juvenile delinquency counts of possession of criminal tools and theft.
The two were sentenced to house arrest, ordered to pay fines and restitution, and they must write 500-word essays on "Why I Should Think Before I Act." But they're still free to play with the Kenton Wildcats when the team opens its season next Friday. Their coach testified on their behalf.
While it may be true in theory that football builds character in young men, we believe the more important lesson to be taught is that criminal behavior - even a stupid prank gone awry - has serious consequences, and that there are worse things in life than missing a football season.

The anti-public alliance is no doubt lurking in the wings ready to blast public education once again, yet the failure this time is clearly with the legal system.

In an appalling, yet not surprising statement, the Superintendent of Schools, defended the decision of the School Board to permit convicted felons to participate in school sports. ‘‘The healing’s got to start some time,’’ Superintendent Doug Roberts said afterward.

The lesson being taught to countless students, students who are sharp and can figure things out for themselves, is that football players are above the law. Each year, there are many compromises made and lessons learned for student athletes of all stripes. These issues are “in house” issues such as grades and work completed. These episodes that occur in practically every high school in the nation often teach the wrong lesson as well. However, the life and death circumstance perpetrated in Kenton, Ohio by two delinquent young men is beyond the pale.

As a teacher and coach, it would not be good for team morale or the long term efficacy of any program to have convicted felons play on the team. The punishment must fit the crime, and while the punishment might fit for the two guilty boys, the accommodations made for these delinquents are not acceptable.

It’s just another case of athletics trumping everything, and in this case everyone-even precious human lives still hanging in the balance.


Others on this topic: If You Would Just Listen to Me, Conservative Culture, This and That, Mommies at Law, Michael's Corner.

WICKED: Starring Hilary, Ned, Jack, and Ray



Hilary Clinton, Jack Murtha, and Ray Nagin, taken collectively, had quite a week. This is not the first time that they have been cited as singing their song of gauche harmony within a few days of each other. It’s almost as if the New York Times kicked off another story for the cast of Hilary, Jack, and Ray to sound off in a discordant unison. Hilary was responsible for the round off back tuck that brought the verbal gymnastics to a conclusion on Friday. Attempting to pull off the mother of all political triangulations, Hilary had a rendezvous with Ned Lamont to stage-manage and scheme for his campaign against Joe Lieberman. Never mind that Bill Clinton campaigned vigorously for Lieberman in the primary or that Hilary endorsed old Joe just a few weeks ago. The leftist, socialist wing of her party has surrounded her like the winged monkeys of Oz to demand her loyalty to their patron saint, Ned, as he attempts to unseat the evil Joe. Leave it to Hilary to fly in on her broom and attempt to save the day. The monkeys’ will no doubt protect her as they fly rapidly, in a vulture like formation, to protect her against all the elements of Oz, or in this case, The Times, The Post, and The Daily Kos.

From the New York Post
: August 26, 2006 -- WASHINGTON - Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton yesterday jumped off the sidelines to throw the full weight of her monstrous political machine behind anti-war Democratic darling Ned Lamont - a move aimed at appeasing her liberal critics. To help Lamont thwart an independent general election challenge from Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman, Clinton is loaning Lamont her trusted political spinmeister Howard Wolfson and vowing to help the political novice raise gobs of campaign cash. The relationship is mutually beneficial: While Lamont gets access to Clinton's campaign experts and fund-raisers; she can reap some of the liberal love being heaped on Lamont by party activists and bloggers. She revealed the stunning scope of her support over coffee during an hour-long meeting with Lamont, his wife Annie and his campaign manager Tom Swan at her Chappaqua home yesterday morning.
And, the Daily Kos loved it! In well over 300 comments, readers of the Daily Kos express their obvious glee at the meeting of Elphaba and Fiyero. (If lost, see the Wicked homepage). In the meantime, The Times, The Post, and The Daily Kos are cheering Hilary on in her latest display of unadulterated duplicity. These media outlets hold only conservatives accountable.

Jack Murtha had his moment in Oz this week too. Murtha continues to blame America for the rise of terrorism in the world, and therefore espouses the appeasement strategy of Europe by default.
Poor Jack Murtha, he's tried everything, and he obviously can't help it. He will say anything to get back to the front and center of the mainstream media circus. He seems to know precisely what to say to return his name and picture to the front pages of the mainstream media. "Instead of deterring terrorism, our policies are fostering it," Murtha said. "We're spending $8 billion a month on this war, our courageous fighting men and women are being killed and maimed and we are wreaking havoc on Iraq. An end must be brought to this now.” Murtha truly believes that America has created the terrorism. His logic surely applies to pre-9.11 policy as well. Therefore, Murtha blames America for 9.11 and the entire scope of worldwide terrorism. What a fool! It looks like Murtha has the early lead for idiot of the week.
To continue with the Wicked theme, Murtha seems to see himself as the great Wizard himself, behind the curtain, pulling the strings and pushing the buttons. Too bad Murtha already overplayed his hand, and pulled his own curtain away as he exposed his true motive: to run for majority leader when Nancy Pelosi ascends to Speaker. Murtha’s fifteen minutes of fame has probably just entered its final Act.

With Hilary as Elphaba, Lamont as Fiyero, and Murtha as the Wizard, Nagin completes our cast today in the role of Madame Morrible. An aging magician, trying to instruct others in the craft, Morrible often gets her foot in her mouth. The comparison to Nagin is obvious. His colorful comments are approaching the status of legendary, and if we didn’t know they were true, Nagin’s comments would seem like something straight from the Myth of Oz.

With the onslaught of Katrina anniversary stories just about to begin there is just another irresponsible statement from Ray Nagin: New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin criticized efforts to develop the empty World Trade Center site when confronted in a television interview about delays in rebuilding his city after Hurricane Katrina. During the CBS "60 minutes" interview, a correspondent pointed out flood-damaged cars still on the streets of New Orleans' devastated Ninth Ward. Nagin replied, "You guys in New York can't get a hole in the ground fixed, and it's five years later. So let's be fair," according to CBS.

From the New York Daily News: New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin refused to apologize for taking a cheap shot at the sluggish rebuilding of Ground Zero - but Mayor Bloomberg would not hit back. Bloomberg said he was "scrupulously avoiding criticizing anybody" and focused on the efforts New Yorkers made to help the victims of Hurricane Katrina last year. "We sent down police officers, firefighters, correction officers, equipment to New Orleans," Bloomberg said on his weekly radio show. "So I'll let Mayor Nagin worry about [rebuilding] New Orleans and I'll try to do everything I can to help the governor here." Nagin had upset some New York officials by invoking Ground Zero during a tour of New Orleans' still-decimated Ninth Ward in an attempt to deflect criticism about the pace of the cleanup in the Big Easy.

Come on Ray, you're slipping. This comment didn't have the humor of your earlier comments like "Chocolate City." This was just mean-spirited and stupid. Maybe you and Kathleen Blanco need another skirmish to bring out your best verbal fireworks.


Is it possible in Nagin's twisted mind that the Katrina disaster and a terrorist attack are equivalent events? In what universe does Nagin exist...


We have assembled part of our cast for this upcoming production of Wicked. The days ahead, replete with fabricated Katrina plotlines and half truths, will no doubt provide fodder for more trips down that famed yellow brick road of fantasy, fiction, and contrived intrigue.


Check out Stop the ACLU, MsUnderestimated, Michelle Malkin, Captain's Quarters, TMH's Bacon Bits, Mudville Gazette, Hot Air.

Friday, August 25, 2006

Ray Nagin's Twisted Mind

With the onslaught of Katrina anniversary stories just about to begin there is just another irresponsible statement from Ray Nagin:

New Orleans Mayor Ray Nagin criticized efforts to redevelop the World Trade Center site when confronted in a television interview about delays in rebuilding his city after Hurricane Katrina.

During the CBS "60 minutes" interview, a correspondent pointed out flood-damaged cars still on the streets of New Orleans' devastated Ninth Ward. Nagin replied, "You guys in New York can't get a hole in the ground fixed, and it's five years later. So let's be fair," according to CBS.

Come on Ray, you're slipping. This comment didn't have the humor of your earlier comments like "Chocolate City." This was just mean-spirited and stupid. Is it possible in Nagin's twisted mind that the Katrina disaster and a terrorist attack are eqivilent events? In what universe is Nagin existing...

Red Hawk Review
Ten Stupid Things Said By Liberals
Junkyard Blog
The Jerry Springer, Al Gore, Ray Nagin, Hilary Clinton, and Jack Murtha America
The New York Daily News

Our Covert Enemies

Michael Barone is almost always fabulous. This week, along with Ann Coulter, he writes about those within the United States who are the covert enimies of our way of life. "Our covert enemies don't want the Islamo-fascists to win. But in some corner of their hearts, they would like us to lose." His writing is brilliant, and it is unfortunate that millions of Americans will never see it and understand it.

In our war against Islamo-fascist terrorism, we face enemies both overt and covert. The overt enemies are, of course, the terrorists themselves. Their motives are clear: They hate our society because of its freedoms and liberties, and want to make us all submit to their totalitarian form of Islam. They are busy trying to wreak harm on us in any way they can. Against them we can fight back, as we did when British authorities arrested the men and women who were plotting to blow up a dozen airliners over the Atlantic.

Our covert enemies are harder to identify, for they live in large numbers within our midst. And in terms of intentions, they are not enemies in the sense that they consciously wish to destroy our society. On the contrary, they enjoy our freedoms and often call for their expansion. But they have also been working, over many years, to undermine faith in our society and confidence in its goodness. These covert enemies are those among our elites who have promoted the ideas labeled as multiculturalism, moral relativism and (the term is Professor Samuel Huntington's) transnationalism.

At the center of their thinking is a notion of moral relativism. No idea is morally superior to another. Hitler had his way, we have ours -- who's to say who is right? No ideas should be "privileged," especially those that have been the guiding forces in the development and improvement of Western civilization. Rich white men have imposed their ideas because of their wealth and through the use of force. Rich white nations imposed their rule on benighted people of color around the world. For this sin of imperialism they must forever be regarded as morally stained and presumptively wrong. Our covert enemies go quickly from the notion that all societies are morally equal to the notion that all societies are morally equal except ours, which is worse.

Barone is a fascinating and gifted author. Read the entire column, it is well worth the time and the effort. When you watch CNN, NBC, MSNBC, and other mainstream media outlets they demonstrate their central role in aiding and promoting our covert enemies.

Blackwell and Strickland

With the approach of Labor Day, the race for Ohio Governor is heating up. At Thespis Journal, we are watching the election from the wings at this point. Our hearts may be with Ken Blackwell, but the burning issue of public education keeps Strickland as a viable alternative.

Oh no! Eric Kephas says that Strickland is nothing more than “Ohio’s Jimmy Carter.” Eric could easily be right.

The Democratic Party still has no plan, and Ted Strickland is really nothing more than Ohio's Jimmy Carter. When push comes to shove, a lot of people are going to decide that - regardless of what they think about the Ohio GOP - Strickland is too liberal, too inexperienced, and too much like what we've already had.

You'll see more of this as the campaign goes on. Unhappy Republicans may flirt with Ted Strickland, but they'll come home to Ken Blackwell. Eric is sharp. Eric’s guess is my forecast too.
At the Boring Made Dull, there is a report of Blackwell in the Lion’s Den. We share the concerns of the professional educators in the room.

The political forces in Ohio are polarized when it comes to dealing with the issue of public education. The education of an entire generation of Ohio’s students may be sacrificed while so-called leaders posture themselves with ideological purity and partisan demagoguery. This polarization wins elections. It is terribly unfortunate that Ohio’s leaders will not come together and make education in Ohio a real priority, and join in a collaborative model that can sell Ohio to the nation.

More at Project Logic
Stop the ACLU

Thursday, August 24, 2006

Ann Coulter Hits The Nail

With her column today, Ann Coulter cuts through the daily birrage of liberal drivel that the Iraqi war has nothing to do with the War on Terror. As usual, she puts into words what many others are thinking. Ann asks the question, "What part of the war on terror do liberals support?" Ann is really correct in her analysis. Liberals do not support the Patriot Act, the Iraqi War, the NSA survellance program, or any of the other efforts of our military to defend the United States in this current war. Here's the preamble of Ann's article today.

This year's Democratic plan for the future is another inane sound bite designed to trick American voters into trusting them with national security.

To wit, they're claiming there is no connection between the war on terror and the war in Iraq, and while they're all for the war against terror — absolutely in favor of that war — they are adamantly opposed to the Iraq war. You know, the war where the U.S. military is killing thousands upon thousands of terrorists (described in the media as "Iraqi civilians," even if they are from Jordan, like the now-dead leader of al-Qaida in Iraq, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi). That war.

As Howard Dean put it this week, "The occupation in Iraq is costing American lives and hampering our ability to fight the real global war on terror."

This would be like complaining that Roosevelt's war in Germany was hampering our ability to fight the real global war on fascism. Or anti-discrimination laws were hampering our ability to fight the real war on racism. Or dusting is hampering our ability to fight the real war on dust.


It's Ned Lamont time for the democrat party. I still believe that some issue will rally the conservative base of voters and get these people to the polls. There were indications of a narrowing of the races this week.

With Sherrod Brown and Ted Strickland emboldened in Ohio to speak of overtly liberal causes, it seems like quite a year of the liberal. I guess time will tell. The liberals are measuring curtains in the speaker's office and the Governor's mansion. They seem very confident. Again, only time will tell. These early polls are not the same result that we will see on election day. If the election were held today, there might be a democrat landslide. But the election is November 7. Maybe someone needs to take a message to Howard Dean: the election is on November 7.

Eyes on Fox
has a ridiculous view of Ann's appearance on Neil Cavuto today. Read it to get an idea of leftist views.

Watch Ann's heated appearance
on Hannity and Colmes last night.

Wednesday, August 23, 2006

Usher's First Preview Night



This post is dedicated to Daniel Gould and Kevin McColaugh.

There was a great deal of coverage in today's New York papers after last night's first appearance by Usher in the Broadway revival of Chicago. Although he is technically only in previews-his official opening takes place on September 5, there were hints that Usher can sing, dance, and sometimes act his way through the role of Billy Flynn. There has been lots of press, and ticket sales for Chicago are hot.

Check out the coverage, and hurry to Manhattan to see it for yourself if you have the time, financial backing, and interest.

The New York Post, The New York Daily News, Broadway.com

Carnival Time


You'll want to check out these useful and informative carnivals. Thanks to the wonderful hosts for providing this invaluable service. There is a lot of good reading at both. Sit back, read, and enjoy a "day in the woods."

The 81st Carnival of Education

Carnival of Ohio Politics #36

Tuesday, August 22, 2006

The Murtha of all Morons...


Poor Jack Murtha, he's tried everything, and he obviously can't help it. He will say anything to get back to the front and center of the mainstream media circus. He seems to know precisely what to say to return his name and picture to the front pages of the mainstream media.

"Instead of deterring terrorism, our policies are fostering it," Murtha said. "We're spending $8 billion a month on this war, our courageous fighting men and women are being killed and maimed and we are wreaking havoc on Iraq. An end must be brought to this now."


Murtha truly believes that America has created the terrorism. His logic surely applies to pre-9.11 policy as well. Therefore, Murtha blames America for 9.11 and the entire scope of worldwide terrorism. What an idiot. It looks like Murtha has the early lead as a nominee for this week's Carnival of the Insanities.

Heavy-Handed Politics Murtha's Big Waves,

Still Missing...

MsUnderestimated and Michelle Malkin have been all over the story of missing Fox News reporter Steve Centanni and his cameraman Olaf Wiig. Please pray for these Americans facing an unknown circumstance. Here's more courtesy of Michelle Malkin:
Fox News Channel reporter Steve Centanni and freelance cameraman Olaf Wiig are still missing. It has now been more than a week since their kidnapping at gunpoint in Gaza by unknown terrorists. FNC top management, the journalists' families, and Palestinian journalists continue to press for their release.

Following up on my post late Sunday night, some media types are now musing that one possible reason the story is not getting the attention it deserves is that there aren't any "new" developments to report. Vaughn Ververs, CJR Daily, and Stephen Spruiell at The Media Blog weigh in. TV blogs are covering the story: check TV Newser, Johnny Dollar, and Inside Cable News.

My opinion: No news is news. So is unchecked terrorist thuggery against Western journalists. The disappearance of Centanni and Wiig is at least as newsworthy as--and far more threatening to our national security than--people falling off cruise ships or getting eaten by alligators or attacked by bees.


Thanks Michelle and others covering this topic: MsUnderestimated, Hot Air, Media Blog, TV Newser and many others.




.

Monday, August 21, 2006

Dwelling on a Faulty Report Card

Scroll for updates.

Scott Elliot, education reporter for the Dayton Daily Democrat, is a reputable reporter who maintains a fine blog on the Daily News site. In his blog, Get on the Bus, Mr. Elliot covers a variety of topics spanning the scope of current trends in education. Lately, however, he has been exercised about test scores, and on the premise that “if it bleeds it leads,” Elliot has produced a series of posts that inflate the importance of the high stakes testing scheme imposed by the state and federal government. Elliot has also permitted these rankings and scores to dominate much of his reporting in the newspaper, and he has become an inadvertent cheerleader for the slimy politician’s defective paradigm that these tests actually reveal the worthiness of individual schools and school districts. These willing mainstream media types have allowed themselves to be duped by all those in the anti public school alliance into thinking that these inconsistent, one day, high stakes assessments are reliable and worthy of so much commentary and attention. The excessive emphasis on these tests in now more widely exaggerated as the media have sung their same tired song as if reporting a drive-by shooting. The media hype fostered by Mr. Elliot and the Dayton Daily News has placed school districts in the Miami Valley and throughout the state of Ohio at greater risk. Education professionals are now facing a stage that has been reprehensively and defectively set for the voters of Ohio. While Scott Elliot has no doubt attempted to focus his readers on the critical issues facing public schools, his blog has become a something of a propaganda tool for artificial thinking and twisted logic.

Spotlighting several of Mr. Elliot’s posts will illuminate the egregious and untimely prominence given to test scores in recent days.
In the post “The Valley’s Top Fifty Elementary Schools,” Elliot writes, “It just so happens that a small school in the city that exclusively serves handicapped students (some of them with severe handicaps) was rated the top school in the area on state reports that came out last week.”
“THE top school!” (The emphasis is all Mr. Elliot’s)

In a post fitting for tabloid night on ESPN’s Sports Center, Elliot anoints this year’s winners and losers in “The Miami Valley’s Winners and Losers.” These metaphorical acrobatics promote illegitimate thinking and foster non-productive attitudes among administrators who allow themselves to attempt to win the super-bowl sweepstakes of education assessments and thereby achieve status in publications like the Dayton Daily News. This type of thinking and writing permits and encourages an undeserving and unfortunate credibility to the testing regimen. To quote Mr. Elliot in his best sportscaster tone, “Here’s one way to judge. I looked at last year ranking of the 60 Miami Valley school districts for performance index score (the state’s measure of test performance across all grades) and compared it to this year’s ranking to see what the biggest changes were. From that comparison, here are the Miami Valley’s biggest report card winners and losers this year.”

Two posts, “Lots of Report Card Improvement,” and “What’s Your District’s Ranking,” emphasize rankings and standings above any true measurement of achievement and ignores comprehensive reform plans that span the entire educational program offered to students.

The sheer volume of posting about the test score component and the incessant sports-like comparisons endorses the flawed prototype promulgated by those who view education as an exact science that can only be measured on one high stakes testing day. The preponderance of posting at Get on the Bus is a productive and enlightening discourse that represents a valid addition to any serious discussion of trends in education. Any further dwelling upon the state report card and all of the ensuing contrived comparisons would be irresponsible reporting-especially in such a highly visible blog of far reaching influence in the Miami Valley. Spending this much time covering the little league World Series of an underhanded scheme designed by the haters of public education is not warranted or constructive. Using an unfairly designed, competitive educational model pretending that all factors are equal, as the foundation for a week’s worth of reporting is a risky and badly chosen proposition for any newspaper or journalist of class and status.

Perhaps Mr. Elliot, or another fine journalist in the Miami Valley will find a voice reporting on the inestimable innovations and successes to be found in public schools throughout the Dayton area. As any educator or parent knows, the results of one high stakes testing day are important only to pompous, bloviating politicians looking for votes in the November elections, and to sensational tabloid artists trying to sell newspapers at the expense of the public servants who may be achieving daily miracles while facing insurmountable odds.

Update: The following comment exchange with Mr. Elliot's participation is worth printing in the text of the article.

This post is a classic case of blaming the messenger. We're in the information business in MSM. The simple fact is people want this information. The blog is a useful venue to make it available to them. It's really not up to me to decide on behalf of readers whether or not they SHOULD want this information, or if this is an appropriate way to judge schools. The fact is, this IS how we judge schools as a state and nation. In other reporting, the DDN has established a track record of asking very tough questions about our state's testing program and NCLB in a pair of award-winning series, just as you are urging the MSM should do.
Scott Elliott

Simply operating by cliché (“A classic case of blaming the messenger”) ignores and misses the point of the negligent choices that Mr. Elliot is making to dwell inordinately upon this issue. He also avoids responsibility for his unwavering effort to make the entire scheme about winning and losing. This narrow view of the situation is suitable for tabloid, sensationalist reporting that does not require the detail, nuance, and diligence of in-depth reporting. There is little attempt to acknowledge or report facts which impact upon success in the high stakes testing scheme. I suppose that a comprehensive report is too much work, and, “the public doesn’t want it.”

It is shallow and short-sighted to blithely, even naively, state that this is how “we” judge schools as a state and as a nation. There are other methods of evaluating and assessing the effectiveness of schools. The erroneous impression given by Mr. Elliot in his profuse blogging on this topic is that schools systems should be compared and discussed using the same parameters as any athletic event. By dwelling on the test scores, Mr. Elliot only furthers misconceptions about public education. While simplifying the topic for the mass public, Elliot makes it appear that there are not any other apposite measurements by which to judge public schools. Elliot fosters the drive-by approach of viewing education through the same prism as a sporting event. When called on for this obvious deficiency, he cowers behind the cloak of “providing a service for the public” when reality demonstrates that he is doing the precise opposite.

Sunday, August 20, 2006

Theater Quick Links










Update: Pippin to extend its' run.

Citing a demand for tickets, Goodspeed Musicals has extended its production of Pippin to Sept. 29 at the Goodspeed Opera House in East Haddam, CT.

Check it out: Playbill has the details.



The New York Times has a wonderful article on National Tours of hit Broadway shows. It seems like the shows are having a great deal of difficulty.

By lifting the quality of its road shows, Broadway also raised their cost and the audiences’ expectations. And when the show coming through town is “Little Shop of Horrors” rather than an internationally acclaimed hit, fewer people are willing to pay $150 for a pair of tickets, especially when they can instead watch a rented movie on their flat-screen television. “There are no inexpensive shows anymore,” said Scott Zeiger, a producer who previously ran the division of Clear Channel Communications that promoted touring shows. “Ticket buyers are now forced to make choices. They can’t necessarily afford to see every single show in a year.”


The artist, Usher, is preparing for his Broadway debut in the role of slick lawyer, Billy Flynn in the on-going Broadway revival of Chicago. This production of Chicago will reach its’ ten year anniversary this November. There have been several episodes in this long run that have seen the ticket be the hottest ticket on Broadway. It’s going to be hard to get a ticket while Usher is in the show.

Read a summary of reviews regarding Patti Lupone’s performance as Mamma Rose in Gypsy last weekend. It sounds like it must have been a truly spectacular Gypsy. Gypsy is so impossible for many community theater programs and most high schools. It’s too bad because Gypsy is such an outstanding show.

Spring Awakening will be one of the first new musicals on Broadway for the 2007 season. Moving from off-Broadway as is Grey Gardens, Spring Awakening sounds like it could be something wonderful.

Pippin at the Goodspeed Opera
sounds like a tremendous period presentation of this classic by Stephen Schwartz

Jimmy Carter, Anna Diggs Taylor, Ned Lamont, and the Implications for the November Elections

Unexpectedly, the events of the last two weeks are likely to be the best news for conservatives in a while. While the followers of Ned Lamont and the minions of George McGovern and Jimmy Carter celebrate perceived victories in the never ending war of public perceptions, there are signs that the victories for the left will be short-term. As grown-up, mature, and thoughtful Americans wake up to the reality that the McGovern/Carter/Kerry party may be about to take over, there may be a renewed vigor in those voters who support the war on Islamic Fascists-just in time for the November elections. The thought of Jimmy Carter’s philosophical heirs being in charge of anything should be enough to frighten anyone over the age of forty into rushing to the polls to vote conservative.

David Limbaugh brings Jimmy Carter’s latest blunder into sharp focus.
Want to know where the Democratic Party stands and where America would be under their leadership? Just ask Jimmy Carter.
Carter is certainly not bashful about bashing the United States, even on foreign soil or to the foreign press. He sat for an interview with Der Spiegel recently and fired with both barrels at President Bush, "fundamentalist" Christians and Israel.
Carter states the Democrats' position quite clearly. Islamo-fascist terrorists aren't that bad. They are probably peace-loving people like the rest of us who just have their noses out of joint over Bush's "unilateral" foreign policy and his "preemptive" attack on Iraq. Indeed, Carter said the Arab world hates us because we invaded Iraq, and even more so for "supporting and encouraging Israel in its unjustified attack on Lebanon."
So the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, occurred because we attacked Iraq in 2003? Israel was unjustified in retaliating against Hezbollah, which is supported by (and a part of) the Lebanese government and its people? If we would just talk to these reasonable terrorists -- such as Hezbollah and Mike Wallace's hero, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, we could achieve peace?
In the interview, Carter pointedly blamed Bush's foreign policy on his Christian "fundamentalism." He nicely articulated the position of today's Democratic leaders, which while scrambling for "values voters," consistently insult them, and while holding themselves out as superior guardians of our national security, see America, not the terrorists, as the problem.

WOW! Jimmy Carter never ceases to amaze me with his whacky statements and total lack of class. As we stated on August 6, “Mr. Carter has opened his mouth again, and while he is bashing President Bush, Carter succeeds in embarrassing himself and has given aid and comfort to the enemy once again. There has been a long standing policy that Former Presidents provide their critiques of current policies in private. Mr. Carter has never accommodated this unwritten rule. Jimmy and Rosalyn Carter have always the lacked the class, wisdom, wisdom, good judgment, and dignity to lead our nation in any meaningful manner.”


Anyway, at the risk of giving away an undisclosed strategy for the Republicans to have another victory in an off year election, Karl Rove must be thinking that he couldn’t have come up with a better series of events to pull back the curtain and expose these liberals of the 21st century. Of course, he has already been accused of orchestrating all of these events. Even the greatest producer on Broadway couldn’t orchestrate an elaborate scheme of key events that is this fantastical or intricate.

The fact that the NSA surveillance program led to the prevention of the London terror plot, the Carter appointed leftist striking down the authority of the NSA and the government to protect US citizens, and the rise of Ned Lamont and his supporters should provide the best opening that conservatives have had all year to focus the issues and draw the contrasts for the American People.

There is increasing evidence that many citizens do not take the threat of terrorism seriously. Various conspiracy theories regarding the imminent attack in London have sprouted wings all over the internet. The left is cheering the decision of Judge Anna Diggs Taylor. No matter that the liberals are joined in all of their positions by Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, and Hammas, defeating George Bush and the republicans is more important than genuine national security issues. A statement that represents the typical liberal position can be found here. Another author says, “Poor Decision, Right Result.” In fact, a cursory look at the posts in the blogosphere have the liberal catching up today with outrageous claims of “unconstitutional!” “Impeachable Offenses,” and “YESSSSS! Judge reigns in Bush's warrantless snooping!


At times like this, there is no more qualified legal scholar to turn to than Mark Levin, author of the fabulous book, Men in Black.
“The New York Times editorial today, cheering on Judge Taylor's lame and irresponsible decision striking down the Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP), is, like Taylor’s opinion, a joke. The liberals like to talk about judicial review and judicial precedent. Yet, this judge ignored all of it. Over the years federal appellate courts have recognized the president's inherit constitutional authority to protect our nation from foreign threats against our national security without the requirement of warrants.”

If the liberals are to be believed, this debate will provide a razor sharp focus for the fall elections. The current stark contrast of views could be abandoned by the democrats if they moderate their radical views like John Kerry attempted to do in 2004. It is more likely, however, that the liberals plan to use their sharply pointed rhetoric and deep-seated views to draw the starkest of contrasts and motivate enough of the same voters who elected Ned Lamont to elect their candidates in a national swing not seen since 1994. There are not enough of these voters nationally to make this a feasible strategy.

It’s time for a major public relations blitz, an education for the average voter about the Carter/Kerry/Lamont party and their appeasement motives accompanied by their cut-and run military plans. The failure of the liberal democrats to acknowledge the threat of terrorism in today’s world is more distasteful and unbelievable than all of the other offenses of the liberal elites. Their propensity to blame America first is the principle inspiration of their politics. They repeatedly state that the United States has created more terrorists despite the lessons and light of history shining on us, and with the ghosts of Hitler and other radical extremists hovering over. These philosophical purists fail to see any real threat to the United States and our way of life. All of this radical liberalism, proposed by the party of Europe plays conveniently into the hand of Osama Bin Laden who has expressed his faith in the lack of America’s resolve. Too bad the democrats appear to be out to prove Bin Laden right again.

Others on this topic: Stuck On Stupid, The American Thinker, The American Spectator, The Come Home Democrats, Don Singleton, Don Surber.

Thursday, August 17, 2006

Get on the Education Carousel


It's time for the weekly Carnival of Education hosted by the originators of this carnival: The Education Wonks. The Wonks are also tireless promoters of educational writing. This carnival, along with many others, gives voice to the concept of freedom of speech, as opposed to others who only talk about freedom of speech while working to limit those who oppose them.

School is starting for many teacher and students across the nation. There is always time for another thoughtful piece by anyone involved in education. Guest bloggers are welcome at Thespis Journal: please let me know.

Wednesday, August 16, 2006

London Plot Exposes The Left

Michael Barone is simply outstanding. He consistently writes interesting columns, and as the 2004 campaign season proved, Barone is the unrivaled expert on elections, voting patterns, and voter turn-out issues. This week, Barone's colum is priceless. Hopefully, many people will have the opportunity to read the enitre article.

Tuesday and Thursday. On Tuesday, anti-Iraq war candidate Ned Lamont beat Sen. Joseph Lieberman in Connecticut's Democratic primary. On Thursday, British authorities arrested more than 20 British Muslims who were plotting to blow up American airliners over the Atlantic Ocean.

Tuesday was a victory for the angry antiwar Left that set the tone in the Democrats' 2003-04 presidential cycle and seems likely to set the tone again in 2007-08. Thursday was a reminder that there are, as George W. Bush has finally taken to calling them, Islamic fascist terrorists who want to kill us and destroy our way of life.

Thursday's lesson was not one Tuesday's victors wanted to learn. Left-wing bloggers played an important part in Lamont's victory. Here's the reaction of one of them, John Aravosis, to the red alert ordered here in response to the British arrests: "Do I sound as if I don't believe this alert? Why, yes, that would be correct. I just don't believe it. Read the article. They say the plot had an 'Al Qaeda footprint.' Ooh, are you scared yet?"
What we are looking at here is cognitive dissonance. The mindset of the Left blogosphere is that there's no real terrorist threat out there.


Barone continues on in the article to draw detailed comparsions of Lamont and Chamberlain. It is a brilliant piece of poltical theater, and Barone skewers today's extreme left for their obvious error in judgment.


Can we expect as much of our Left? It seems doubtful. Our Left criticized George W. Bush when The New York Times revealed that the National Security Agency was surveilling telephone calls from al-Qaida suspects overseas to the United States. Now it appears that the United States surveilled the British terrorists, and that they made phone calls to the United States. The Left cried foul when The New York Times revealed that the United States was monitoring money transfers at the SWIFT bank clearinghouse in Brussels. Now it appears that there was monitoring of money transfers by the British terrorists in Pakistan. On Tuesday, the Left was gleeful that it was scoring political points against George W. Bush. On Thursday, it seemed that the supposedly controversial NSA surveillance contributed to savings thousands of lives.

Joseph Lieberman is being criticized for saying, "I'm worried that too many people, both in politics and out, don't appreciate the seriousness of the threat to American security and the evil of the enemy that faces us -- more evil, or as evil, as Nazism and probably more dangerous than the Soviet communists we fought during the long Cold War. We cannot deceive ourselves that we live in safety today and the war is over, and it's why we have to stay strong and vigilant."

That view didn't prevail on Tuesday. But it sure made sense on Thursday.

The United States needs to deal with its historical ghosts. Exorcise all of these ghosts by refusing to take the European route of appeasement and cowardice.

Hot Air has a post that proves Barone's point: Liberals Do Not Take the Threat Seriously

Check out Stuck on Stupid

MsUnderestimated has great video of Shepherd Smith smacking around a confirmed terrorist: The President of Lebanon. He doesn't get it either!

More examples of liberals not taking it seriously: Urbangrounds,

Notes to Ned

Ned Lamont, democrat candidate for Senate in Connecticut, took a bold step in his general election campaign by writing an Op-Ed piece for the Wall Street Journal today. We say a bold step because his radical, socialist supporters might consider anyone writing for the Wall Street Journal to be treasonous to the religion of ultimate faith in Moveon.org, and the team of netroots bloggers.

Lamont tries to assume the attire of a moderate, yet he ends up the column with his trademark rant about the Iraqi war that is filled with cliché, reminiscent of Helen Thomas, Hezbollah, Cynthia McKinney, and Cindy Sheehan. Additionally, Lamont attempts to highlight a campaign platform and appeal to a wider spectrum of Connecticut voters. A barely masked attempt to play catch up with Senator Lieberman’s revitalized campaign; Lamont is on uncertain footing, and may realize that the dynamics of the race are not in his control. When the New York Times writes an adoring piece on Senator Lieberman, Lamont must be feeling especially uncomfortable. And by the time Chris Matthews starts telling you to your face that Old Joe has the money all lined up from major backers, the air certainly has escaped from that euphoric moment when the mainstreamers televised you with Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton, and Mad Max last Tuesday night.

To remind us while we are all praying for Lieberman to win this November, let’s review a few of the highlights of Lamont’s column today.

• "That's why I talked about my work as a volunteer teacher in the Bridgeport public schools, which can't afford to be open later than 2:30 p.m., schools that send children home to an empty house." (Note to Ned: Many schools close at this hour, and the closing time of school has nothing to do with the achievement level of students, but as a volunteer teacher, you might not know that!).

• "Meanwhile, the government is spending $250 million a day on an unprovoked war in Iraq while starving needed social investment at home. I am a fiscal conservative and our people want their government to be sparing and sensible with their tax dollars. (Note to Ned: This is a “Clinton Whopper.” Your tired mantra about the war in Iraq is trumped by your blatant stupidity regarding social spending. Government spending is up astronomically during the Bush years. Maybe you were kidding when you wrote this statement.)

• "By every available metric, the "stay the course" strategy in Iraq is not a winning strategy. Changing course is neither extreme nor weak; it is essential for our national security." (Note to Ned: your rhetoric here is not only unimaginative; it also misrepresents the situation our military faces in Iraq. You offer no real solutions or strategy for coping with Iraq after you and Murtha lead our troops in cutting and running.)

• But we're bogged down in Iraq, and hamstrung in the war against terror, by leaders who lacked judgment, historical perspective, openness to other cultures and plain old common sense. We offer something different. (Note to Ned: we understand your “diversity” code language for “sharing the love” with Kim Jung Il, Amadenejad, and other Islamic fascists all over the world. Neville Chamberlain said the same things about Hitler, and I trust you know how that turned out.)

• "But in the final analysis, the results of this election say less about me, and more about the people of Connecticut. They turned out in record numbers; they spoke every day with a simple eloquence and urgency about the country we love." (Note to Ned: those record numbers of votes that you write about are minuscule compared to the numbers that you will need to defeat Lieberman this November. Good luck, and may the best man win-there’s no question who that is!)

One has to admire Ned for trying. After all, the New York Times did endorse him, and now Hilary and Bill have joined in the effort. It’s so interesting to note how quickly Al Gore, Howard Dean, Donna Brazile, and the entire democratic machine three Joe overboard. Take heart, Joe! If security concerns stay at the top of the list, you might even win a landslide this Fall. The political post-mortem on that one will be rich with political implications and nuance.

More at The American Prospect, Hang Right Politics, Uncommon Sense, The Big Tent,
Deny My Freedom, Talk Show American, Jay Reading.

Ridiculous Liberal Attempt to Steal The Security Issue

September 11, 2001 changed the national political dialogue for the forseeable future. George Bush and the Republican Party have won the two national elections since 9-11 primarily with their advantage on the most significant isssue of our time: national security.

In the wake of each successful attempt to thwart a terrorist attack, the spokesmen of kook fringe left are utilizing their biased platform (endowed them by mainstream media types) to blast the Bush administration for failing in the war on terror. In their desperate attempt to turn security into a winning issue for democrats, liberals are trying to make up for lost time and lost elections in 2002 and 2004. The goal of the liberals it to make the Bush administration pay for successfully using the security issue in the last two national elections. These liberals, still smarting from the loss of Senators Clelland, Carnahan, Daschle, Mondale and others, are shamelessly clamoring for greater security measures in the face of a five year record of success.


They are against the patriot act, against the war in Iraq, against securing our nation’s borders, against effectively prosecuting a war on Hezbollah, constantly call for a cease fire under the code language of American being an “honest broker,” and promote a purely European agenda at the expense of American values. Every line of attack is followed by the freshest call for a cut and run approach, and a redeployment of troops across the horizon in Okinawa. The right will never stop laughing at Jack Murtha for that faux paus.

The current practice of democrats reached a fever pitch today as Representative Ed Markey spoke about the issue at Reagan National Airport, and again at Boston’s Logan National airport after the successful attempt today to divert a plane from Washington to Boston. This political grandstanding (in the style perfected by Chuckie Schumer) has raised the unseemly aura of having these liberals roll the dice; betting on a successful terror attack against the United States as a stratagem for a democrat victory on November.

When you hear these liberals call for a greater spending on homeland security, propose another cut and run scheme to end the Iraqi War, and when they blame President Bush for the success of foiled terror plots, just remember that these are the politicians who proudly state that they defeated the Patriot Act, who strenuously argue against every terror fighting strategy proffered while offering none of their own, and who are naively asking for your vote this November.

Also, someone needs to tell Representative Markey that cockpits are now safe, security measures are in place and have been working, and that there have been no successful domestic terrorist attacks since September 11. The Patriot Act, the NSA, and the monitoring of international terrorist funds-all of which you and the democrat leadership oppose, have saved countless lives in the five years since that horrific attack.

Other similar topics: TMH Bacon Bits, Dr. Sanity
MsUnderestimated-Thanks!

Monday, August 14, 2006

For Whom The School Bell Tolls.....

A Fresh New Year, Same Musty Old Problems


As I was listening to Neal Boortz blasting all aspects of “government schools” this morning, I realized that school work and thoughts of school work could not be put off any longer. Despite all of the negativity, all the hours of work and challenges ahead, all of the common misunderstandings about the role of a teacher in today’s society, the nearly insurmountable odds, and the sometimes treacherous working conditions, the job must be done, and it must be done well.

It would be best of all of our students came to school prepared emotionally and physically to learn. If these young people were properly fed, loved and suitably parented and nurtured at home, and if each student had sufficient clothing that is not distracting, we would have a nearly model situation for learning. If the school environment were acceptably heated and cooled, if class sizes were reasonable, and if teacher’s abilities were well matched to the needs of their students, we would be on our way to reaching an ideal state for education to occur. If we had apposite materials for each of the classes, and an inviting environment with the technical support and equipment necessary to teach the mandated course of study, we would have met the optimum condition for a school for our students. We would have also met the conditions that the home-schoolers and conservatives think that we operate in every day. Yet, none of these rudimentary prerequisites that create an appropriate educational environment will be true at our school this year, or many other schools around the nation.

The amount of money spent on education appears monumental at first glance. The level of expenditure has voters upset in the state of Ohio and in our local school district. Citizens who have never worked in a school have no idea why schooling our children takes so much money. Additionally, since these voters pay the salaries of every school employee, they tend to demand services at any time of day or night, and expect the school to work miracles with every average student.

I have never been a pessimist. My experiences in education have taught me that student achievement is possible in many circumstances. From day one, the teacher, as the educational leader in the classroom, must set the tone for success. A teacher must believe strongly in himself and just as forcefully in his students. A master teacher must expect the unexpected, and be eclectic enough to believe in the unbelievable. A teacher must carry a vision in her mind and be flexible in altering and molding the vision as the creative process of education moves forward.

Highly successful teachers invest in the success of their students, find innovative and remarkable methods to motivate students, set high goals and standards, push tirelessly toward specific objectives, and aspire to greatness within their discipline. Teaching and learning is a long distance run, an endurance test with many pratfalls and “easy outs” along the way. Sometimes the educational environment is the breeding ground for epic excuse makers. One thing all teachers seem to know, and all students seem to learn are methods of rationalizing away any wayward form of behavior or failure to meet an established target.

Successful teachers, however, must form alliances with students to .promote achievement and in the process transfer the primary responsibility for learning to the student. Providing the tools for independent learning and exploration is a gift that great teachers can sometimes impart to students. A lifetime of learning, exploration, and enjoyment is often the harvest reaped by a student who has made a unique connection with that one significant teacher.

Like many of you, there are teachers in my background of extraordinary abilities and talents. The impact of their teaching is evident on many of their former students and is manifest in my interaction with students today. Their consummate professionalism and breath-taking skills as musicians, directors, and producers has been an inspiration as I have taken each step in teaching across the years.

With all this talk of achievement, motivation, and success here are a few things I could live without in the coming academic year.

• I could live without the extra heating and air-conditioning requests: we have to ask for heating and cooling, and if you forget-it’s too bad for the students. The so-called energy savings program has cost more in manpower, paper pushing, and days of intolerable heat than we ever had prior to the “savings program.” The beneficiary of the savings program: the school district coffers which stand at a record unencumbered balance while teaching positions were eliminated and academic cuts were implemented.

• I could easily live without "Waiver Days." Waiver days are two district wide professional development days that are never well planned, and become an excuse to sit around an eat ice cream and talk with colleagues. The students do not attend school on these days at all. What ever happened to teachers and students committing to time on task directed by the administration?


• I could easily live without the magnified educational jargon, buzz words, and unevaluated building wide initiatives that never come to closure. Teachers and administrators seem to be using our faculty and students as unwilling participants in an educational research lab. Our collective heads are spinning as if we had been on a carousel operating in overdrive, and 90% of it is our own making-not the state legislature.

We experience constantly evolving building goals and projects. These projects are added to the never ending stream of ideas flowing from central office into our lowly valley. Some of these initiatives end up as mandates that cause a major upheaval.

Presentations of ideas explored in some inner sanctum are made with pompous fanfares, yet practical reality never enters the forum. We’ve tried everything from advisory groups to sustained silent reading, from a freshmen academy and smaller learning communities to two column notes. Change is great; however, there is no substitute for a dynamic, engaging teacher who effectively plans and implements lessons that culminate in a variety of assessments. How about simply teaching students, developing a rapport with these students, and focusing on curriculum?

• I could easily live without a master schedule that doesn’t work well for students and teachers: there is a serious administrative failure in comprehensively developing and implementing a schedule which permits a student to access the curriculum that he wants and needs. Surely in the year 2006, there is a better way to complete this critical task.

• I could easily live without the overblown emphasis on school athletic teams at the expense of other curricular and co-curricular programs. This one speaks for itself!

• I could easily live without the constant and supremely unnecessary announcements from the main office in the middle of class. There was a period in my career when teaching time was valued in practice, not just in empty words and meaningless directives.

• I could easily live without adults generating and thriving off of rumors and hearsay. Just the facts, M’am. When someone tells me something, I immediately scan it with a common sense truth test. People expend a ridiculous amount of energy on things that are not true. Busy administrators sometimes operate on rumor too. We can all do better.

A wonderful colleague told me early in my career that teaching is the noblest profession in the world. As professionals we should always remain focused on our number one priority: our students. As teachers, we are among the world’s greatest agents of change. We think, we do, we know, and we act. Teachers are creating a challenging and forward looking educational environment that should not be sidetracked by triviality. Standing in contradistinction to a commonly held thought, we are not mind-numbed robots that wake up every morning waiting on orders from the big house.

Surveys show that members of the public more closely identify with their child’s teacher than with the administration, and that teachers have more credibility than administration on most educational matters in the public view.

Although I don’t write about it often, there are many great things in teaching and working with young people. There are great things happening in the public school each day. Maybe I won’t spend this year living with so many things that I could easily live without.

Late Summer Ghost Light

This late summer day is perfect time for a cup of coffee or glass of iced tea and reading news you'll never see covered in the mainstream media. Just hearing the headlines from the drive-by media: CBS, NBC, CNN, or other liberal media outlet is confusing and confounding on a daily basis. Enjoy the best of the web.




Hot Air has more about the Michigan men and their cell phone problem. It seems that the Treason Times is connected to this plot too.

Captain Ed has an excellent summary of the Sunday News programs and their emphasis on the foiled terror plot. The inane agrument that the Iraqi War is a major distraction from the "real war" is decimated by Ed.
Much of the conversation on yesterday's interview shows centered on the tools needed to provide the necessary security for the US. Chertoff noted that the British have more flexibility for counterterrorist efforts within their country, and those additional powers played a significant role in discovering the extent of the conspiracy. Chertoff declined to explicitly endorse the no-warrant NSA surveillance on international communications, but he told two news shows that we should not leave "tools on the table" in our fight against terrorists. That assertion came under some fire from other talk-show guests. Senator Russ Feingold, widely rumored to be staging a presidential run, says that he thinks NSA surveillance of terrorists is fine, but he wants the NSA to get the warrants first when part of the communication comes from within the US. Ned Lamont struggled to answer Chris Wallace's questions on Fox News Sunday in an appearance that lent little luster to his flagging campaign. He insisted that the US is distracted by the war in Iraq despite the discovery and halt to this massive terrorist plot and the lack of successful attacks on the US since 9/11. He told Wallace that it was "time to focus", but then opposed the Patriot Act and the surveillance programs that Chertoff mentioned. The distraction argument sounds great as a political sound bite, but the evidence seems very thin. It assumes that the government can only perform one task at a time. Congress created the DHS in order to allow for homeland defense while the Pentagon focused on a forward strategy against the terrorists. DHS has nothing to do with Iraq or Afghanistan, and no one has yet to explain why those wars distract DHS from its primary mission. If anything, Katrina showed that homeland security had distracted Chertoff and his team from emergency response, a secondary task that Congress grafted onto the department in what has now widely been acknowledged as a mistake. Chertoff emphatically discarded the notion that Iraq or the successful end to the terrorist plot against British and American airliners had provided a distraction. Their track record speaks to their success, and the collapse of this grand al-Qaeda plan seems to demonstrate even better competence and cooperation than we had hoped.

Rummy Outlfanks Hilary
: see it at Blogs for Condi!
Vote for a presidential ticket here. It's interesting for republicans.
Sister Toldjah has the internals of the Rasmussen poll showing Lieberman ahead in the senate race. The Lamont voters want Bush impeached.

Ouch! Betsy has an analysis of Michael Barone's column today comparing the American Liberals to Neville Chamberlin. These American Liberals don't look too good by comparison.
Tuesday was a victory for the angry antiwar Left that set the tone in the Democrats' 2003-04 presidential cycle and seems likely to set the tone again in 2007-08. Thursday was a reminder that there are, as George W. Bush has finally taken to calling them, Islamic fascist terrorists who want to kill us and destroy our way of life.
Read the whole article-it is worth it.

Centerfield has lots of information on Joe Lieberman in Setting the Record Straight.
AJ Strata has a great piece:
Lamont Shaken by Big League Politics
We Need A Hero at
Ankle Biting Pundits highlights Charles Krauthammer's latest, and predicting the further demise of Democrats.

Sunday, August 13, 2006

Miracle at the Booth: Faith Healer Closes on Broadway






A dazzling run of Brian Friel’s arresting play, Faith Healer closes today on Broadway. Leave it to the New York Times to attempt to slap a Broadway Legend in the face on her way out the door. The New York Theater Community and critics have collectively expressed some concern about Ms. Jones performance in this show, yet the concern has never seemed more speculative, tenuous or ill-timed than in the Times post mortem in Sunday’s edition.

I never wrote a planned review of Faith Healer. After completing reviews of The House in Town, Jersey Boys, The Drowsy Chaperone, and The History Boys, I lacked the creative energy to write glowing reviews of Faith Healer, and The Color Purple. Each of these two shows are dramatically captivating and worthy of the highest accolades.

As Clive Barnes states in his New York Post review, “this is an evening of the most wonderful theater.” There are four independent monologues which recall the same events in striking contrasts. None of the actors physically interact with one another. We are left feeling as though we were in the middle of a bitter disagreement as each character begins his monologue as if they are telling a friend a story. Using humor, anecdote, and metaphor each actor weaves a complex, multidimensional tale more harrowing as it moves forward, and in the case of Ms. Jones, more haunting and disturbed. The monologues are greatly conflicted and conflicting, and with the exception of the Faith Healer’s oblique death, there is no resolution to the eerie dysfunctional saga.

Each of the actors, Ralph Fiennes as the Faith Healer Frank Hardy, Cherry Jones as his wife Grace, and Ian McDiarmid as Teddy turns in a bravura performance with nuance, eloquence, and disquieting emotion. This trio of spectacular performers provides riveting drama which shall linger in the memory like a shimmering autumn evening that is accompanied by the sweetest, fresh, warm apple cider.

It takes a great admirer of the art of acting to enjoy such an evening as some critics referred to the show with such mundane language as boring, lackluster, tedious, and too much to endure. There were, however, other glowing reviews, and I find myself more in tune with these.

Cherry Jones is the Colleen Dewhurst, Julie Harris, or Helen Hayes of this generation. Her towering performance makes her a colossal presence in the company of legends. She possesses a range of emotion that spans anger, rage, perplexity, hurt, and despair that are ensconced in a fragile prey of the psychotic Faith Healer. It would be worth the time to see Ms. Jones perform this tour de force several times to catch all of her tone, imagination, and sensitivity as Grace.

These supreme qualities in Ms. Jones are precisely the remedy for the foolish expose in the Times. Charles Isherwood, who authored this tortured piece in the Times, is believable as a supporter of Ms. Jones, yet he goes to great lengths to prove the she was “trying to hard”: in the role. He must have seen something contrived or forced in the performance that many other observers did not detect. His pertinacious essay sounds like an supercilious Manhattanite caught up in the liberal miasma that has swept up the theater elite.

Although a breath of fresh country air and an extended intermission from these esoteric conditions could benefit Mr. Isherwood and others, they would rather look down their nose and tell other practical theater professionals that Ms. Jones was simply trying too hard, and that we wouldn’t understand. While Isherwood and his ilk are aloof, drinking cinnamon spice mocha skim latte, the rest of us are basking in the glow of the honor of seeing Ms. Jones grace the stage again with her unrivaled skill and prevailing emotion.

Other reviews: The New York Post, Broadway.com, Variety, The NY Daily News

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Saturday Ghost Light

Keeping the Ghost Light on this Saturday morning:

The Peach Pundit has an aritcle about a Friday morning breakfast meeting with Senator Chambliss.

The ACLU Loses
: Subway searches in NYC are ok!

Project Logic
is keeping us updated on Jean Schmidt and the Ohio Political Scene.

With School starting soon, Scott at Get on the Bus asks the question, do schools even matter?

On Reality and Liberalism is a great article over at the Cosmic Conservative.

My thoughts on the security council resolution are very similar to those from Rhet at Perish The Thought.

Clueless NBC Reporter covered by Betsy

Friday, August 11, 2006

Friday Night Thought: The Color Purple






It is a lovely night in August, a night fit to attend
The Color Purple at the Broadway Theater, 53rd Street and Broadway on Manhattan. The Color Purple is a beautiful and stunning show.

On a recent visit to Manhattan, we were able to see this Tony-nominated musical at a Saturday matinee. It was a compelling performance with soaring music and a captivating book. I am very surprised that it didn't win the Tony Award for best new musical-it should have. A review may still be coming as time permits.

In the meantime, catch a bus, plane or train, and head to Manhattan to experience the most emotional musical playing on Broadway today-THE COLOR PURPLE.

GOD IS INSIDE YOU AND EVERYONE ELSE
THAT WAS OR EVER WILL BE.
WE COME INTO THIS WORLD WITH GOD.
BUT ONLY THEM WHO LOOK INSIDE FIND IT.
GOD IS THE FLOWERS AND EVERYTHING ELSE
THAT WAS OR EVER WILL BE.
AND WHEN YOU FEEL THE TRUTH SO REAL,
AND WHEN YOU LOVE THE WAY YOU FEEL, YOU'VE FOUND IT
JUST AS SURE AS MOONLIGHT BLESS THE NIGHT.
LIKE A BLADE OF CORN,
LIKE A HONEYBEE,
LIKE A WATERFALL,
ALL A PART OF ME.
LIKE THE COLOR PURPLE,
WHERE DO IT COME FROM?
OPEN UP YOUR EYES,
LOOK WHAT GOD HAS DONE


Mike Wallace: Idiot of the Week!


Mike Wallace's exclusive interview with the Iranian president is going to receive a couple of major showcases in coming days.

On Sunday's "60 Minutes," the chat will take up the program's first two segments. Wallace, left, conducted the interview this week with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, right, in Tehran. The CBS newsmagazine airs at 7 p.m. Sunday on WKMG-Channel 6.

C-SPAN announced Friday that it will replay the "60 Minutes" segment at 8 p.m. Monday. Then C-SPAN will present Wallace's whole 90-minute interview with the Iranian leader. Afterward, C-SPAN will asks viewers to supply their reactions in an open-phone segment. According to a C-SPAN release, CBS News said that the Iranian asked for the interview to be played in its entirety on the cable channel.

Remember when Chris Wallace said that his Dad, Mike Wallace had "Lost it..." Well.....


Mike Wallace has to qualify for idiot of the week. In the middle of renewed terror threats and as citizens in the cross-Atlantic alliance of London and Washington contemplate a new 9-11 tragedy, Mike Wallace descends from on high to enlighten the world about the likeability and reasonability of President Ahmadinejad.

Like the arrogant northeastern liberal that he is, Wallace has come out of the interview testifying to the decency and intrigue of the levelheaded President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Wallace was interviewed on CNN this afternoon and repeatedly called the Iranian President, “Fascinating, self-assured,” and that, “he is not a madman.” Wallace also asserted that Ahmadinejad is not Anti-Jewish, but that he is simply anti-Zionist state. Mike Wallace demonstrated an abiding respect for Ahmandinejad, and appears to be on a one person campaign to get Americans to like the Iranian President.

Below is a partial transcript of the some of Mike Wallace’s statements about the interview.

MW: I am with you 100% in what I perceived to be the individual that I was about to sit down and talk to. And he made his case, fairly rationally. It wasn't...it was a conversation. He did not propagandize and so forth. He...when I began to talk to him about America, about the United States, and oppression, he had his facts down solid about why he feels sorry, he says, for President Bush. Why? And then he starts in about the polls of President Bush, and how they're going down, and how he's going to leave office, and it's sad that he's going to leave office and leave behind a people who don't really approve of him. His approval ratings are what they are. And what is the standing of the United States in the world generally under President Bush. And it's...we weren't having an argument. I mean, we were having a discussion. And he was infinitely more rational than I had expected him to be.

As the liberal forge ahead with their Treason, serious issues in the war on Islamic Fascists threaten our nation. There are real issues ahead for the American people. Playing with dictators and using them to bash President Bush is doing nothing to further the cause of freedom. It might be good, however, for the majority of our citizens to see Mike Wallace facilitate the rehabilitation of a dictator.

Anyone for a quick trip to Iran before the summer ends?

Read about a Mike Wallace interview of Hitler...it's hilarious

The Iranian President requests that the entire interview be shown on C-Span
Is the Iranian President Anti-Semetic...
The Amercian Thinker has more...
Check out STOP THE ACLU

Lamont's Folly


The contrived campaign of Ned Lamont is destined for ultimate failure. The jubilant cries from liberals across the country will ring hollow on Election Day this November. I hope we see lots of photographs from the Lamont defeat rally on Election night. The moonbats should be in rare form by that time. Let's hope that they aren't affected by Crazy Mc-K syndrome.

Conspiracy theorists on the left have already hedged their bets by blaming President Bush in advance of a Lieberman victory. George Stephanopoulos, Clinton hack and host of the Sunday ABC program, “This Week,” was out there with a partial story about Karl Rove, and having it later corrected and clarified.


In its lead editorial today, The New York Sun gets it just about perfect.


"Now that the returns are in, the concession phone call made, the speeches delivered, and the general election campaign begun, it's clear that the winner of Tuesday's Democratic primary for Senate in Connecticut is — Joseph Lieberman. With his intraparty opponents exposed as a bunch of Internet-addled loons tinged with anti-Semitism who will support anti-war inherited wealth over interests of blue collar working families, Mr. Lieberman is liberated from the modern Democratic Party and bursting to campaign as an independent.
"

Mr Lieberman is a liberal of the first degree. He behaved very poorly during the Sore/Loserman days of November and December, 2000. HOWEVER, he has demonstrated himself to be a man of integrity. The loony left has been unhappy with Mr. Lieberman since his failure (in their warped minds) to attack Dick Cheney strongly enough in the 2000 Vice-Presidential Debate.

The superb Peggy Noonan, Ronald Reagan’s star speech writer, has insights that escape the liberals to catch up in their own self induced euphoria.


If I were Mr. Lieberman's campaign manager I'd take heart from Mr. Lamont's victory speech on Tuesday night. At one point he seemed to catch himself, stop himself from going down one rhetorical route and go down another. But he didn't do it like a pro. He did it like someone who all of a sudden remembered some political advice someone whispered in his ear. He was talking about what seemed to be a voter he'd met on the trail, and you could tell he was going to paint her frustration and despair. Then he remembered he was supposed to come across not as aggrieved but as triumphant and hopeful, so he pulled himself off the anecdote and wandered down some safer route of banality.


He was standing there with confetti glittering distractedly on his hair, and on the shoulders of his dark suit--he and his people are new enough in politics that there's no one around him yet to brush the confetti off and say, "It looks like dandruff." He looked as shocked as anyone that he was the Democratic nominee for senator from Connecticut. He looked like what Dick Morris, who said he'd once had Mr. Lamont as a client, said of him in his column the next day: a "rich, light-weight dilettante" who inherited the fortune of J.P. Morgan's partner. Mr. Lamont does have the soft, startled look of the inheritor of huge wealth. And we'll certainly be hearing more about that.


Wait for November all ye criers of the Bush/Conservative demise.

Watch Ann Coulter and Tom Delay together on Neal Cavuto
.
Mudville Gazette

Thursday, August 10, 2006

Thoughts on 8.10.2006


THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: The recent arrests that our fellow citizens are now learning about are a stark reminder that this nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation.

I want to thank the government of Tony Blair and officials in the United Kingdom for their good work in busting this plot. I thank the officials in Washington, D.C. and around our country who gather intelligence and who work to protect the American people. The cooperation on this venture was excellent -- cooperation between U.K. and U.S. authorities and officials was solid. And the cooperation amongst agencies within our government was excellent.

This country is safer than it was prior to 9/11. We've taken a lot of measures to protect the American people. But obviously, we're still not completely safe, because there are people that still plot and people who want to harm us for what we believe in. It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the United States of America. And that is why we have given our officials the tools they need to protect our people.

Travelers are going to be inconvenienced as a result of the steps we've taken. I urge their patience and ask them to be vigilant. The inconvenience is -- occurs because we will take the steps necessary to protect the American people.

Again, I appreciate the close cooperation between our government and the government of the United Kingdom. The American people need to know we live in a dangerous world, but our government will do everything we can to protect our people from those dangers.

Thank you.


Several thoughts on a day when the War on Islamic Terror was brought home again
.

• The United States needs to use an overpowering and overwhelming force to get control in Iraq. While the US will, no doubt, remain in Iraq for many years in the future, a level of control must be established there permitting a focus on other areas as well.

• Israel needs to move with overwhelming force on Hezbollah and squelch their insurrection. If there is another devastating terrorist attack and many lives are lost, the public will rise in favor of overwhelming force to silence the terrorists.

• Uncle Teddy Kennedy, Ned Lamont, John Kerry, and Harry Reid can not be permitted to have control over this nation’s foreign policy. They really don’t get it. See what the other side is saying.

Dick Morris, Bill O’Reilly, and others are more than confident that the NSA program was critical in revealing the plot of the terrorists today. Too bad the Treason Times had to reveal and attack this program that has today saved thousands of lives.

The New York Times uses today’s episode to blast Joe Lieberman. It will be interesting to watch the times haunt Senator Lieberman throughout the next two months as they attempt one headline at a time to destroy the Senator.

The Daily Kos
has Larry Sabato's snapshot of the Fall Elections as of today.
Dick Morris says that Lieberman Will Rise Again
Appeasement Mentality Should have Consequences for Britian

MsUnderestimated to All of Europe: Wake The Hell Up!

Mudville Gazette

Wednesday, August 09, 2006

What a Day!

The shrill voices of the left have been unusually unhinged today. Generally, I enjoy the banter and dialogue, and I have enjoyed it today. Today, the liberals screeching, shrill tone reminds me of auditions for a bad production of Annie. Every time I watch Crazy Mc-K's meltdown and singing last night, I have to laugh.
Stuck on Stupid
highlights the Defeat-o-crats. Have a laugh, we need it.

Speaking of a good laugh, Peach Pundit has more on the McKinney clan meltodown last night.
The Treason Times
gets on the photo-plagiarism.Captain Ed reports on finding Iranian soldiers fighting with Hezbollah. This could really change the dynamics in the region.
AJ Strata
has more-he always does remarkable work.

Changing the subject to education:

Scott at Get on The Bus
is having a one-year blogiversary! Congratulations. Stop by and look around, Scott does a nice job.
It's worse than I thought
expresses my view every year when we return to school.
Priorities out of Balance
is really something to think about for our students as we all return to school.

And on theater and New York City:

Ian Schrager has a new hotel on Manhattan. It sounds intriguing. This is a really interesting article.
Here's
a chance to see the wonderful Daniel Reichard of Jersey Boys at another venue in New York. Reichard sings extremely well, and with great ease. His voice isn't showing any wear and tear from his marvelous performance in the Tony Award winning Jersey Boys.
Grease will get another Broadway Revival with the casting being done on a reality show. I'm not sure what to think about this one.

It's Carnival Time


Get on the merry-go-round, it's Carnival Time. Ride around once with Loony Ned Lamont. For sentimental reasons, go 'round once with Crazy Mc-K. Ride along with Clinton apologist Lanny Davis as he introduces you to a new term in American Politics: Liberal McCarthyism. Finally, take at least three rides around with the unhinged left who have declared today that the Bush years are over. Enjoy your time in the midway.

The weekly Carnival of Education is posted at California Live Wire. If you have never attended an online blogger's Carnival, you will enjoy the collection of posts from so many sides of the asisle.

Michael Moore gives a warning to Democrats and Republicans on the heels of Ned Lamont's win. Moore, Jimmy Carter's best friend, believes that we should cut and run immediately.

Neal Boortz sounds off on Cynthia McKinney. Too bad we won't have Cynthia around to laugh at any more.

Some very interesting coverage from Captain Ed last night.

Stuck on Stupid has a great photo of Crazy MC-K! You have to see her concession speech. McKinney implies that the election was stolen-by 16,000 votes.

Ken at "Oblogatory Anecdotes" says the following:

"Democrats dropped a nuclear bomb on themselves tonight dashing any hope they had in retaking the House or the Senate. By defeating Senator Joe Lieberman in the Connecticut Democratic primary the Democrats have shown they are no longer the party of FDR or JFK. They are now the party of Cindy Sheehan, and Michael Moore. They have veered hopelessly to the far left. With the extreme left firmly in charge of the party apparatus it insures their defeat come this November. No matter how angry people may be with the Republicans, the American people are not going to hand over the reigns of power to extremists."

Liberals were celebrating all over the place last night. They claim that the Bush years are over. They wish! By handing their party over to the kook, fringe, unhinged left, they have made Karl Rove's day. A few thousand left wing voters in Connecticut, voters who are ALL liberal to begin with, don't set the tone for national elections. These voters selected the most liberal of two avowed liberal socialists. I think that Cindy Sheehan, Jesse Jackson, John Kerry, Jack Murtha Charlie Rangel, Mad Maxine Waters, and other northeastern elites think that the troops will start coming home today.

The 2006 political season just got a whole lot hotter, and it's going to be a great three months.

TMH Bacon Bits

Tuesday, August 08, 2006

From Another Former Student.....

Another former student has joined in the debate with Chrisopher Rice. All of you will remember Rice from this post. The feedback is greatly appreciated, and I will let this author speak for himself. If there are any other former students wishing to engage in this debate, or to initiate another one, please email Thespis Journal.

Chris,

Thank you for your thoughts. I am also a big supporter of Thespis Journal. I read your comments today and would like to address some of your points.

First, I am wondering about the common values you would have Americans coalesce around. From my quick read of your letter, it seems that the way the American people should come together is through mutual support of an increase in the minimum wage, redistribution of wealth in New Orleans, Al Gore being president, universal child care, and high-tailing it out of Iraq as soon as we can distribute the white flags to our soldiers.

Surely, you see that these values that you hold are poisonous to the eyes of any conservative leaning individuals that may read your post. And that is just it...this is the very reason why we can not, will not, and should not "come together" and end partisanship in the United States. Partisanship is the place where opposing views meet in the arena of ideas. Instead of discouraging partisanship, you should be heralding it and wishing for a tidal wave of it. If you truly believe that increasing the minimum wage and getting out of Iraq are the paths to a better America...then fight for it, argue for it, have your partisanship kick my partisanship's ass in the arena of ideas. May the best man, woman, or transgendered individual win.

I believe in competition. I believe in it in business, in the schools, at the post office, and yes in politics. If we were to go the way of the John McCain's of the world, the "moderates", then how would our best ideas come forward? If we just took the bland middle road doing what was agreeable to both sides how would we ever get to try out new ideas. Would we have ever passed welfare reform? No of course not because if the republican majority in congress waited around for the democrat minority to agree to a plan...we would have never passed any reform and we would still have life-long welfare mothers milking the system. Now you have two years of welfare benefits for life, so you better get your life together quick! Welfare to WORK baby. But instead, the republican majority passed welfare reform over the political corpses of the congressional democrats, and we finally got some reform that now even democrats will reluctantly admit has been successful (and then will immediately change the subject).

Instead of ridiculing Ann Coulter for her sarcasm and wit, you should be encouraging her to speak her mind. If she is that crazy and "over the top" the American public will see this and will be more inclined to vote for the Democrats in November. This is exactly what republicans have been doing with Cynthia McKinney in Georgia for years. Every time she makes a statement in support of Hammas, Al Qaeda, or any of her other socialist beliefs...I just sit back, enjoy and hope that a lot of people are watching her embarrass herself.

I will look forward to seeing more of your write on Thespis Journal. Maybe we can spar again later.

Almost Dr. Kevin

Ghost Light: Thespis Glow

Old Joe Lieberman might just pull out a win today.

A final Quinnipiac poll before today's vote showed Lamont ahead 51%-45%, a 6-point lead in a poll with a 4-point margin of error. Lamont had a 13-point lead in the same poll last week.

"The momentum has shifted into the other direction, that's absolutely clear," said Quinnipiac polling chief Mickey Carroll. "Belatedly, the regular Democrats woke up a little and said 'holy smokes.' But the question is, can it take off 13 points from Lamont? Did the shift come in time for Lieberman?"

WOW! I hope that Larry King has Jack Murtha lined up for tonight.
The impact of a New LaMont win on Hilary could be very interesting.
Here's what some New Hampshire voters think of Hilary.

Alan Colmes stands up for Reuters. Ned LaMont is a caricature. There will be lots of fodder if he wins today.

Cokie Roberts has a unique perspective on this race. A Lamont win could be a great thing for Republicans.

Monday, August 07, 2006

This August Election Day is "VL Day" for Conservatives

THIS AUGUST ELECTION DAY IS "VICTORY OVER LIBERALS DAY" FOR CONSERVATIVES

Today will tell us a lot about Joe Lieberman's Fate, and the fate of the democrat party this year.

The Old Line is trying to get out the vote for Ned LaMont.
The Other Eye has a Great Defense of Joe Lieberman

You'll remember that we forecast weeks ago that the outcome of Joe Lieberman's race on Tuesday would be a win for George Bush and the Republicans regardless of the outcome of the election.The political banter in the media since the time of that posting has confirmed our thinking even more. Tuesday promises to be a very interesting political day with the drive-by media following predictable plot lines and thinking that is dominated by cliches. Here is the analysis of an Angry Liberal:

"An interesting thought being discussed is how this CT primary outcome will strengthen Gore's prospects for 2008 and weaken Hillary's. It makes sense."

I love it, these liberals want to run Al Gore again. That should make for a wonderful race, or how about Gore/Clinton '08. Imagine Hilary as Vice-President.

Just like their multiplicity of tortured views on the Iraqi War, the National Democrats have no well matched unison on all things Lieberman, and appear to be in total chaos as the mid-term elections grow near. Hilary Clinton and John Kerry have typically nuanced positions in this primary race scheduled for August 8. Hilary supports old Joe now, but will support Ned Lamont if he wins the democrat primary. Kerry says he doesn't get involved in primary races, but has actively selected and supported candidates in primaries in the past. In other words, Kerry voted for Joe before he voted against him.

There is no outcome of this closely watched race that will fail to benefit President Bush and the current common sense, conservative view of the War in Iraq. In the most likely scenario that has Lieberman winning, a demonstration of support by moderates for President Bush's view will sharply strengthen the conservative position. Should Lieberman lose, it will dramatically illustrate and illuminate an intricate debate raging within the democrat party. It will show that the liberal party is extreme, and willing to purge any elected official from their party who fails to endorse the "cut and run" strategy so regularly endorsed by Jack Murtha, Barbara Boxer, John Kerry, and all the other liberal voices of note within the party at this moment.

Peach Pundit thinks that Cynthia McKinney will win. With polling for primaries being so unreliable, Peach Pundit could easily be right. McKinney has a reputation for getting her voters to the polls.

It should be a very interesting day of victories over liberals in these highly-charged races.

On Hannity and Colmes tonight, Democrat Pollster Pat Cadell said that "democrats are prepared to eat their young."

Gateway Pundit has it right, Good-Bye Moderate Democrat Party-Hello Wacko Left
!

Uncorrelated thinks that there is Joementum..
Craig Cheslog is an honest liberal who is blasting Joe Lieberman.
Swing State Project has a run down of all of Tuesday's races.

Broadway World.Com: Manipulated by Manhattan Elites

Accusing your adversaries of being inarticulate, utilizing diversionary tactics like name calling and stridently worded invective to avoid sincere debates, making outlandish claims that have an emotional edge, and implying extremism about your opponent are all tried and true techniques of propaganda artists.

Elitism isn't about geography, or one's current location. Elitism can be found anywhere, but it is profoundly acute in the inner sanctum of Manhattan. It is specifically true in the liberal haven of the performing arts community, and most pronounced in the narrow cubicle of the theater community.


Some elitists on Manhattan have never met anyone who voted for George Bush and insist that his election was stolen. Since “they” never spoke to a Bush voter, his election was impossible. It is likely that many of the posters on this board have never had anyone challenge the credibility of a "Tony Award Winning Performer," none of their friends or acquaintances ever questioned why a leading actor failed to show up for work.


It is likely that only someone who has played a show in a Broadway Theater, or personally knows the star, knows anything about vocal health. You know, it's a wonder we can live life at all out here in the hinter lands that make up the rest of the country. Gosh, golly gee, we rely on Manhattanites to help us define major issues, tell us how to vote, and even when to offer a concern or suggestion about some ridiculous code of behavior at a Broadway House. We even depend upon these self proclaimed experts to remind us when we are talking about live theater and not a made for television movie. Why, without these demigods from Manhattan, we wouldn't know the difference.



Recently, I had a harrowing experience with blog posting and interaction at the popular website catering to New York Theater: Broadway World. Regular readers of Thespis Journal know about our recent review of Jersey Boys, and of the concern that arose on a recent trip to Broadway where a number of Tony Award winning performers were found to be playing erratic and unreliable performance schedules without regard for notifying audience members. Lost LaChanze provides documentation and further evidence of the high absenteeism of Broadway’s brightest stars.

Well, evidently we have committed a travesty of justice by raising this as an issue with the fanatical fans of John Lloyd Young, winner for leading actor in a musical in Jersey Boys. Mr. Young is by all reports an outstanding performer, and there are some public shreds of evidence that demonstrate his talent. John Lloyd Young sounds great on the original cast recording, and his appearances on the Today Show, and the Tony Awards were remarkable. He has not played many performances in the past two weeks, and was forced to strp of the performances again this weekend on Saturday and Sunday.

Mr. Young has developed quite a fan base, and these devoted fans move easily from emotional instability to hysterically unhinged in a matter of a few postings. At first glance it appears that these posters are minions of the producers as they scramble to dampen any public questioning of their beloved. They are accepting of any excuse, and place blind faith in the artists despite a growing body of evidence to suggest that an eight week performance schedule will never again be met. Several contradictory explanations have surfaced regarding Mr. Young, and even the moderator of the Broadway World Board seems confused as to the generation and extent of Mr. Young’s vocal difficulties. The moderator assures all readers of his musings that Young’s absence has nothing to do with the vocal demands of the role. I am wondering if the moderator can say, spell, or comprehend the word naive.

The following quotes represent the finest logic, cosmological debating technique, and melodramatic insults offered by these “broadway legends” on some of the posting threads:

“Thank God for the Thezpiss Blahhhhg, a production of a certifiable mincing, prisspot persnickety, and Broadway attendance monitor-slash-Ann Coulter lover.”

“I bet he went home to rest or something. I feel bad for him though...he's missed so many shows because of being sick, and that really bites when you're a performer who loves to do what you do. A shame since he just returned from a week off for vocal rest.”


From the moderator: “And as I stated earlier, it's not a problem with his chords (stress or otherwise), or singing falsetto. He is battling an infection. An infection is an infection! The demand on the role has NOTHING to do with one being ill.”

His absences are not due to him not being able to handle the score. They are due to an infection in his body which if he DID sing, could cause damage. It's called being preventative.

“Is that your blog? If it is, you sound like an idiot.”

“I live in New York City. You live in Ohio. I know a little bit more than you.”

“You can write condescendingly as if everybody in the world is one of the teenagers you (God forbid) teach, but you should just realize that sometimes life isn't fair, you don't always get your own way, and move along to writing your rave review of Ann Coulter's "Godless."

“If you think there should be an alternate (cast) so much, then you write to the producers, and stop voicing about it on the board. You're just stirring up trouble.”

“Big deal if people drop out, Broadway is not easy.”

“I hope they give your high school graduates a nice bottle of visine and box of kleenex on their way out, because there must be a lot of wide-eyed, drooling, exhausted young people emerging from your torture chamber.”

“What do you think of the Socialist, treasonist (sic) New York Times for reporting on the US government's multitude of violations of the law and their subsequent cover-ups (sic)?”


Not half as unseemly as that ugly-ass set you've got as your avatar

“Give the guy a friggin break. So he won a Tony…..”

“Our "right" as audience members is to see a show worthy of the $$ we shell out. I have never been at a performance with one understudy that I felt I didn't "get my money's worth"

“Maybe you can make friends with the wardrobe people at SPAMALOT, they'll give you a little costume and you and your buddy Ann Coulter can take your little crusade to the New York Times building. Recruit the Naked Cowboy on the way, it'll be CUTE.”

“Maybe he should just come on here and post or send his chart from the doctor to you. Maybe than you will stop being such an ignorant mess.”

“I'm calling you out on your bitter idiocy.”

“So unless LaChanze or JLY appear above the title, you're getting exactly what you paid for, THE COLOR PURPLE or JERSEY BOYS. Period.”

“This show is not about John, it is about the four seasons, it is not going to kill anyone if John misses, lets give the guy a break ok? He is human like the rest of us.”

“Something tells me Ruth and Teddy from Ohio are lining up for tickets to see a show about the Four Seasons anyway, not the guy who won the Tony.”

“Shut up shut up SHUT UP. For once and for all SHUT UP!”

“I feel like we are going to read about you and your followers drinking Kool-Aid and committing a mass suicide.”

Well, all of those comments sound like liberals and their usual excuse making crowd of Manhattan liberals. Not one comment actually addressed the point of John Lloyd Young and other performers missing performances so regularly. The producers refuse to address the issue, and would in fact like to have it buried below the public relations radar screen. And the producers are joined by whining, complicit liberals over at Broadway World.

Let me say this, not all of the posters agreed with the pompous, chattering claque pontificating in their Manhattan echo-chamber. There were several other strong observations about Mr. Young’s vocal health, the need for actors to show up for work, and the need for an alternating cast with public notifications for repeated episodes of nonappearance.

Two critical points would help Broadway World regain some credibility.

• Broadway World needs to fully embrace the central tenant of elite liberalism and get some diversity on the moderating team. For a moderator to simply enjoin a posse of harassing and narrowly focused regular posters, all centered in metropolitan New York fails to include the views of others outside Manhattan. Perhaps a more diverse and competent board will be more inclusive of all views. Currently, any statement apart from gushing tributes professing undying affection for a particular performer are met with harassment, innuendo, infantile name calling, and condescension. When the offenders agree with the juvenile posters, there is no moderation, only intolerance and fanaticism.


• Broadway World could actively monitor performing schedules and make the public aware of cast absences, and question the producers on this matter.

Even High School students know that a play is more about a team effort than a star turn. It is about integrity, honesty, and trust. Of course, people get sick. Of course they can't perform. All those arguing this on the other side act as if this inoculates actors from any criticism. Speculation and criticism are part of the business. The news of repeated absences within a two week period should be released publicly.

On the matter of John Lloyd Young, the proficiency and dexterity of the moderator in processing the multiplicity of concerns surrounding Young’s deficiency of attendance the last two weeks is not plausible at best, and not credible at worst. Yes, Mr. Young is ill, and it is fine to regurgitate his blog postings about the current situation.

It is, however, audaciously irresponsible to continue to be complicit in a delusional theory that the vocal acrobatics of Franki Valli are not a part of the problem, and to perpetuate and develop theories that will naively support the position of the actor and the producer. Broadway World has become the tool of Broadway Producers and militant fans. It is disappointing that a site as attractively designed and multifunctional as Broadway World could become little more than reading Pravda of the Broadway community.

It seems that Broadway World sees itself as only cheerleader for Broadway shows without any responsibility to advocate for the paying customer: the audience. Broadway World has set aside natural journalistic curiosity in order to accommodate the emotional attachments of the moderator to particular performers. At Broadway World there are no current problems with actors performing on an announced schedule, no solutions needed, and Broadway World can teach us, the under classes that it doesn’t matter who performs the role: just smile and enjoy it.

And when you’re posting on the boards, be sure to join the opinions of the moderator who allows those who agree with him to bully other contributors. Then you will have arrived, and you will be heralded as influential, prophetic, and worthy to participate in the illusory planet enjoyed at Broadway World by all the Manhattan elites.

Read the Review: It tells how much we loved the show!

Sunday, August 06, 2006

Reviews from San Francisco


We’re a couple of days behind on this, however, the reviews from the Broadway Bound production of A Chorus Line playing out of town previews in San Francisco are in. It sounds like it could be a great show.

Previously, we have written that we are looking forward to this particular revival even if the production is untimely. We are wishing this revival nothing but success, but if the show fails, the chattering klatches in the media will spin out a variety of worn-out theatrical philosophies that they are already trying out in their commentaries and in chat rooms. The ensuing debate, surrounding a failed production, will do nothing to commercially, intellectually, or artistically advance the discussion of Broadway in the 21st Century. A successful production with a glorious run could benefit another generation of theater goers, and like Gypsy before it, set a pattern of successful revivals to come, each of them fifteen to twenty years apart.

I have always had concerns about A Chorus Line being overrated. Of course, there are two or three really good songs, but unless this production is dazzling, it may seem like a confusing relic out of place in today’s theater world. I am certain of one thing: Charlotte D’Amboise will be thrilling.

The New York Times
has an excellent preview article. Also the Times highlights are notable error in the original version of a review printed in Variety.

When Variety’s review of the Broadway-bound revival of “A Chorus Line,” which opened this week at the Curran Theater in San Francisco, went online on Thursday, fanatical “Chorus Line”-ologists experienced a memory check. The critic, Dennis Harvey, called the show’s finale the “only notable departure” from the original 1975 Broadway production, which, he wrote, ended “with a spotlight tracing the invisible marquee star’s soft-shoe path, while the dancers, who’d knocked themselves out to get this far, smiled and sweated in the background.” The change, the review said, “feels like a heinous error.” Which was, in a sense, true. Because the shiny gold phalanx of dancers that ended this production was very much in the original. The mistake was quickly corrected online, and the offending sentences did not appear in the print edition of Daily Variety. But what happened? In an interview yesterday, Mr. Harvey, a freelance reviewer, said he recalled seeing a production in the early 1980’s, though he could not remember exactly where, which had the ending he described. “It made a very strong impression on me,” he said. “I assumed it was part of the original directorial intent, since it was so striking.”


Here are some highlights from some of the most infromative reviews:

Dennis Harvey in the somewhat controversial review in Variety:

A tad more racially and physically diverse than in '75, the new cast ingratiates itself as the evening goes on, just as they should. There are no star-making turns. But Jason Tam makes a plaintive impression as damaged-goods Paul; Deidre Goodwin is a snappy, sassy Sheila; Mara Davi as Maggie sports perhaps the evening's sweetest pipes; and Ken Alan gives good Paul Lynde as Bobby. It will take another "Chorus Line" to take things a step further: One can easily imagine a slimmed-down revision running 90 minutes or so. That tighter version could trim the rambling ex-lovers' spat between director Zach (Michael Berresse) and crawling-back-to-the-chorus former "featured dancer" Cassie (Charlotte d'Amboise).


Robert Hurwitt in the San Francisco Chronicle:


The toss of the head, the sensuously smooth sidle, the effortless extension of a leg high above her head, the impossibly graceful elongated arch of the back -- each element of Charlotte d'Amboise's "The Music and the Mirror" solo blends with the rest in engrossing harmony. Reflected in multiple perspectives in the mirrors of Robin Wagner's set, d'Amboise's every move builds upon the last in a glorious tribute to dance, the musical theater and the choreographer who created the piece in the first place, Michael Bennett.

It is, as it should be, one of the crowning achievements of the impressive Broadway-bound revival of "A Chorus Line" that opened Wednesday at the Curran Theatre. It's a breathtakingly beautiful showcase of the talents that took d'Amboise's Cassie out of chorus lines to featured roles in the past -- and a demonstration of why it's so hard for her to break back into the chorus. As such, it vividly sets up the emotionally fraught tension of the ensemble "One" that follows. Try as she might to blend in with the rest, Cassie can't seem to help giving every step and gesture just a little bit more. She's that one member of almost every chorus you can't stop watching.

Karen D’Souza in The Mercury News

If the new Broadway-bound revival of ``A Chorus Line'' got a score card, the dancing would rate a near-perfect 10, the acting a meager 3 and the directing, well, that approaches zero. Bob Avian's formulaic production, now trying out at San Francisco's Curran Theatre before marching on Broadway, has all the moves but none of the hear
The creative team seems content with replicating the vintage look of this classic, right down to retro unitards and George Hamilton jokes, but not its edge. Aficionados with high expectations are likely to walk away a tad disappointed, and newbies may wonder what the fuss was about. Morales isn't the only one who feels nothing.
Sean Martinfield in the San Francisco Sentinel:
In the coveted role of "Cassie", it is the amazing and much under-used Charlotte d'Amboise who scored the operatic "Bravas!" of the evening. Although well rewarded for her Broadway appearances as "Roxie Hart" (CHICAGO), "Charity" (in SWEET CHARITY) and "Lola" (DAMN YANKEES), Ms. d'Amboise finally gets her chance to come through and exhibits the stuff of legendary Broadway Divas. Although "Cassie" is begging her former lover "Zach" for a position in the chorus, Charlotte d'Amboise will never again serve as anyone's Understudy or Replacement. "Oh, The Lady In Red" - she took our breath away.


Pat Craig in the Contra Costa Times

From the cheers and applause that started as soon as the mirrored backdrop began to glisten at the rear of the dark stage, you'd swear "A Chorus Line" was a long-lost cousin returning to the family fold.
And, in a sense, that's exactly what the cheering was all about. Wednesday's San Francisco opening, after all, was the first big-league revival of the wildly popular, and fourth-longest-running, Broadway musical. It opened in 1975 and ran for more than two decades, and for many theater fans who came of age in the late '70s and '80s, it was the ultimate musical comedy.

Jimmy Carter Quacks Again

There should be a sunset clause on the publication of comments by former Presidents who embarrass the nation. Depending on the failure rate of a presidency, or after a couple of dozen royal screw-ups, the former President should have no forum from which to spout his folly. When Ronald Reagan skunked Jimmy Carter in November, 1980, the nation breathed collective sigh of relief as we believed we were finished being lectured by the king of malaise. Jimmy Carter, the person whose method of fighting the cold war was to tell the communists that we would not attend the Olympics, the man who perfected the misery index, and the real accident of the Watergate history should be exposed for his sheer silliness.

The public is weary of hearing from the mainstream elite press that Jimmy Carter is the best former President in our nation’s history. Jimmy Carter is more dangerous now than when he was in The White House. While in the White House he had advisors who could partially protect him from his own stupidity. Along with many other Americans, I am ashamed of Jimmy Carter, and the efforts of a complicit liberal press to rehabilitate Mr. Carter will not be successful.

Mr. Carter has opened his mouth again, and while he is bashing President Bush, Carter succeeds in embarrassing himself and has given aid and comfort to the enemy once again. There has been a long standing policy that Former Presidents provide their critiques of current policies in private. Mr. Carter has never accommodated this unwritten rule. Jimmy and Rosalyn Carter have always the lacked the class, wisdom, wisdom, good judgment, and dignity to lead our nation in any meaningful manner. The following are three of the ludicrous points made by Mr. Carter.

• President Bush has pursued an "erroneous policy" that has fostered violence in the Middle East, said former President Jimmy Carter, who brokered the historic Camp David Accords between Israel and Egypt. "In my opinion, maybe the worst ally Israel has had in Washington has been the George W. Bush administration, which hasn't worked to bring a permanent peace to Israel," Carter said Friday during a stop in West Michigan.

• "It depends on whether world opinion is strong enough to get the administration to change its erroneous policy, which has been to encourage the continuation of attacks on both sides."

• "In my opinion, we should make every effort now to withdraw American troops from Iraq," he said. "I would say certainly begin a major withdrawal no later than the end of this year."

The guys at Powerline have extensive research on the disastrous former presidency of Jimmy Carter. They state the ideas extremely well, and provide a compelling indictment of Mr. Carter’s worth as a statesman in the post September 11 political climate.

Jimmy Carter is a disgrace. We've said so before, and we'll continue saying so as long as he merits the criticism. If you want to learn more, read Steven Hayward's book The Real Jimmy Carter. Carter panted after the Nobe Peace Prize for years, seeing it as a means of gaining official redemption for his humiliation at the hands of the voters in 1980. He lobbied quietly behind the scenes for years to get the prize, and finally met with success in 2002 when the left-wing Nobel Prize committee saw an opportunity to use Carter as a way of attacking President Bush and embarrassing the United States. The head of the Nobel Prize committee openly admitted that this was their motivation in selecting Carter. Any other ex-president would have refused to be a part of such an obvious anti-American intrigue, but not Jimmy. Here we should observe that Carter conceives himself much more as a citizen of the world than as a citizen of the United States, and I think it is highly revealing that Carter is most popular overseas in those nations that hate America the most, such as Syria, where they lined the streets cheering for Carter when he visited.

Update: Check out Stuck on Stupid-It looks great!

Check out the Sunday Funnies at Stop The ACLU

An opposing view of Jimmy Carter

Check Outside The Beltway
Wizbang has more coverage of irrational Bush hatred, Talk Left Really Hates Bush,
Maybe Blogging will help my Career...,Mudville Gazette,The Carnival of the Insanities is Hilarious!
Don Surber has information on Robert Byrd-who is crazy too!, JunkYard Blog,Basil's Picnic,
Theodore's World has more, Intellectual Lint has the connections with CNN, The Tao of Politics
Secundum Christum has it right! You have to read this MUT CASE! Cosmic Conservative
Expose The Left, MsUnderestimated
Six Meat Buffet-this is hilarious

Saturday, August 05, 2006

Bob Fosse's Sweet Charity



The New York Times Anita Gates has a snotty little piece today regarding the production of Bob Fosse's, Neil Simon, and Cy Coleman's Sweet Charity currently in a Gateway Playhouse Production.
Bob Fosse’s “Sweet Charity” is a true period piece now, as the lively new production at the Gateway Playhouse in Bellport colorfully demonstrates. The minidresses and go-go boots in the first scene bring back very specific memories for audience members of a certain age. The hippie outfits in the “Rhythm of Life” number are decidedly groovy. (A costume coordinator, Marianne Dominy, is listed in the program as well as a costume designer, Lesley Neilson-Bowman.) And the stop-action party scene at the Pompeii Club reveals just how much the innovative 1960’s television series “Rowan & Martin’s Laugh-In” stole from Fosse.

But what matters most about “Sweet Charity” is the title character, played by Gwen Verdon in the original 1966 Broadway production and by Shirley MacLaine in the 1969 film. (There have been several Broadway revivals, including one last year that starred Christina Applegate. Enough said.)

Sweet Charity is a hidden gem of a show-almost lost in the canon of great musicals. I am going to print my review from the 2005 Broadway revival. Contrary to Anita Gate's not so sly insult, it was a production that was well worth $100. I would love to be involved with a production fo Sweet Charity sometime soon.

ON THIS SUMMER NIGHT, SWEET CHARITY SIZZLED!


It was so hot while I was making my way to the Al Hirschfield Theater on Tuesday night, that I had to wonder if Sweet Charity would be worth the effort. A myriad of thoughts were flowing in my mind: The show almost closed in Boston after Christina Applegate broke her ankle, and only a true last minute, show-business miracle (meaning a lot of money) got this revival on Broadway by the May 4 the deadline for entry into the 2005 Tony Award sweeps.

Reading and research had indicated that this show was ok, and mostly a vehicle for its' original star, Gwen Verdon. The show seemed to be to a remnant of 1966 with little appeal to today's audience. While known for a couple of great numbers, the show appears on the surface to have failed to make it into the canon of widely performed shows. It is sometimes billed as a tawdry look at the life of a dance hall mistress. Boy, was I surprised!!

I would have willingly paid the price of the ticket ($102) just to see this ensemble perform the dance: "Rich Man's Frug"!! The design of this dance was classic Bob Fosse with just enough edge and revision to keep an audience member entranced for the full eight to nine minutes of this number. The orchestra, and I do mean orchestra-there were about twenty players (huge by today's Broadway standards), played this music in stellar fashion with great bravura and showmanship! "Rich Man's Frug" was easily in the top fifteen numbers I have ever seen on Broadway, and that is really saying something big! The dancer’s movements were truly mesmerizing, and I found myself with chills at this glorious sight!

If "Rich Man's Frug" was the crème and the froth of Act I, "The Rhythm of Life" matched this energy and style in the second act. It was an amazing number with the emotion of a great revival meeting, the voice of a great WIZ, the dancing genius of Bob Fosse, and the unbridled energy of 1966 all ensconced in one miraculous show-stopping moment. When the black character who sings the lead on "Rhythm of Life" opened his full-throated, big black man sound, there was a house quaking moment rarely felt on Broadway today. It was AMAZING! I had no idea of the total concept of "Rhythm of Life." This number must have revolutionized Broadway in 1966, even if this revival took some creative liberties in making this number fresh for 2005!! I wanted to stand up and cheer for fifteen minutes after both "Rich Man's Frug," and "The Rythmn of Life."


The supporting cast members in this show are stupendous! Dennis O'Hare is an actor and comedian of the first degree. He does not appear in the show until more than an hour into Act I. When he comes on, he seems meek and mild, but within four minutes, he has stopped the show with the greatest comedy seen since the great Carol Burnett show. He possesses a range of comedic tricks, and depth of character that a thrilling sight to behold! Janine LaManna and Kyra DaCosta have voices that will thrill and chill you, and both of these singing actors can steal a scene from anyone!


But this is a show that starts and ends with Charity Hope Valentine. And Christina Applegate - the ankle-impaired star of TV, but Broadway unknown - is good. I am certain that she is not better than the brilliant and far more experienced Charlotte D'Amboise, and not as polished, but Applegate, as pretty as a picture and as cool as a popsicle, emerges from the entire ordeal of trying to get this show to Broadway triumphant and glistening. She brings obvious commitment and energy to the role, and a sincerity that is unique. It would be wonderful to see Karen Ziemba or Miss D'Amboise do the role.


Cy Coleman's music absolutely soars! The orchestrations are wonderful, and the music almost lifts you right out of your seat.
It was certainly my privilege to see this classic of Broadway. I wish I could attend again just to catch more of the show. The book by Neil Simon is enchanting. I am sure that it pushed the Broadway musical forward in 1966 with its' unhappy ending, and the sadness of Charity's life. it is amazing to think that when this show first appeared on Broadway, Hello Dolly was in its' original run, along with Funny Girl and Fiddler on the Roof. Sweet Charity really deserves its' place along side those great originals-it is simply a different genre.

Attacking the Wrong Teacher....

The sensationalist gossip hounds in the media can't wait to report on every instance of alleged teacher abuse often employing exaggeration, innuendo, and slander to make it seem that all teachers are predators or left wing nuts. We have developed the thesis before in an Open Letter to Michelle Malkin which generated much debate and discussion. When an innovative and dynamic teacher is doing the job extraordinarily well, invests money in advanced training, or spends hours mentoring students who are the victims of inadequate parenting, the paparazzi is no where in sight to tell these success stories.

Conventional wisdom also holds that school districts can not fire teachers. This overblown falsehood is widely believed in the conservative community, yet in Ohio it has never been easier for Boards of Education to dismiss anyone on a limited contract-without any substantive reason or even the low threshold of just cause.

Recently, Thespis Journal has witnessed a disturbing trend developing. Rather than administrators following a simple procedure ridding themselves of poor teachers, they are spending time harassing people who are doing the job well. There is an apparent tendency to force good teachers from their classrooms for baseless allegations that usually involve age, disability, and a smorgasbord of other tidbits of idle chitchat. These administrators attempt to spin together several stories that represent the fiction of cave men, try these stories out in their tight administrative bubble, and show as evidence something akin to an impressionistic painting of hazy moonlight. These loosely organized thoughts take on a life of their own in administrative circles, and the flawed perceptions soon become a reality. Almost always, the teacher is in their classroom is performing their duties admirably while administrators sit around and contemplate a method of forcing the teacher from the classroom.

Administrators are often astonishingly unfamiliar with the application of statutes which may impact on their actions in these highly charged circumstances. It would seem that competent administrators would be capable of setting priorities that would trump their need to target particular teachers. We wish we had the time to research and discuss the many subjective decisions made by administrators and the elaborate stories they concoct to sell their employer, The Local Board of Education, on their latest set of questionable priorities. All too often, Board members hear only an out of tune and tired melody from administrators that are lacking in the intellect, sophistication, requisite life experience, and common sense to manage the school district and its employees.

This appears to be the case in an instance cited by the Education Wonks. Read it for yourself; see if the story doesn’t beg a few questions. Where was the administration twenty years ago if there were such a huge language barrier for this teacher? Doesn’t this demonstrate once a for all the flaws of peer review?

With a school year about to begin for many teachers across Ohio, here’s hoping for administrators who will set priorities that rise above victories on the athletic fields, and move into the realm of academic achievement for students in all areas across the curriculum-not just the narrow focus of high stakes tests.

Read more in The Washington Times

Thespis Review: The House in Town



It seems the essence of a splendid new chamber drama, The House in Town, escaped many of the New York Theater critics. This lovely new production, by playwright Richard Greenberg (Take Me Out, Three Days of Rain) played its’ final performance on Sunday, July 30 at the Mitzi Newhouse Theater. In this charming play there are sublime passages of dialogue, an element of ambiguity and intrigue, and dreamlike acting that rivals any play currently on the boards in New York City. The entire drama unfolds in a mere ninety-five minutes on a stage filled with gorgeous sets, meticulous costumes, and an ensemble of actors that are extraordinarily matched to this astonishing new material by Mr. Greenberg.

A show is not normally reviewed upon its’ final performance. No writer or critic is present at anything but the most celebrated of closings to provide a comprehensive post-mortem of memorable or unmemorable shows. So, viewing The House in Town at this moment was a rarified chance to see these skilled professionals at the pinnacle of their art. These devoted actors were playing characters of depth and range. They have seen their distinct roles ripen, evolve, and develop a full bouquet of layered flavors rich in timbre and fragrance.

The setting is an elegant townhouse on Millionaires' Row, the name for 23rd St. between Ninth and 10th Aves. in the early 20th century. It's the home of Sam and Amy Hammer, a wealthy store owner and his wife. The story unspools during the first months of 1929, not long before the stock market crash, and change is already in the air.

There’s an odd building looming sixteen stories high that is woven into this intricately woven plot. Across the street from the Hammers, a hulking apartment complex, London Terrace, has gone up and blocked the sun from the mansion.

No matter. "At home," says Amy, "I like everything to be a little dark."

The miasma of dysfunctional marriage is the focus of Greenberg's marital portrait of Sam (Mark Harelik), who is Jewish, and Amy (Jessica Hecht), who isn't. The story begins with Amy fixated on having a baby (years of unsuccessful attempts have made the pair stop trying), as Sam is becoming preoccupied with helping a young clerk, Christopher (Dan Bittner), who works in his department store and whose mother has recently died.

Circumstances arise and secrets come out that tangle and tear at the fabric of the marriage. There are plot twists that are never overtly foreshadowed, and which embed the story with an element of what-will-happen-next. The plot twists are all a natural extension of the back story which is spun out in sporadic episodes of dialogue throughout the play.

As directed by Doug Hughes, the cast is uniformly terrific. Harelik is dapper and dignified as a man whose past business dealings come back to haunt him. As friends Con, a doctor, and his wife, Jean, a skilled gossip who schools Amy in the power of information, Armand Schultz and Becky Ann Baker add both gravity and levity.

Jessica Hecht is the axis around which this production mobilizes. She is endearing, touching, and possesses an aura of hope and optimism which she morphs into an ambience of bitterness and distress late in the play. Hecht is actor of nuanced line delivery laced with vivid emotions. I wanted to see her do the role again immediately since I was certain that I had missed something.

And we conclude as we began:The New York critics were so obsessed with drubbing Mr. Greenberg’s prolific output in the last year that they missed the beauty of this understated masterpiece. In their efforts to be elite, sound cultured, and be contemporary, they assessed from a much too narrow view. The House in Town may have a long life in the theater. It may be living out that life in regional and even non-professional houses in the near term. When Greenberg’s works are evaluated anew in twenty years, The House in Town, may prove to be the hidden masterstroke of his proven genius.

Other reviews: Variety, Townhall
The New York Times, The New York Sun, The New York Post, Stage Directions,

Friday, August 04, 2006

Fox News: Fair, Balanced, and in First Place...


It's no secret that we are Fox News Fans. The depth and interest of programming including the strong anchoring broadcasts of Special Report with Brit Hume in the evening and Fox and Friends in the morning make Fox News number one every day in common sense news and truth. Fox News presents all sides and consistently crushes the competition.

According to Variety Magazine, Fox News did it again in July. Fox News beat CNN in every hour of the day for the 55th straight month. Every hour of the day? WOW! Fox News averages about 1.5 million viewers in prime time compared with 864,000 for CNN. Way to go Fox News!

This is the Special Report Homepage
News Busters has a more factual take on the data.
Ian has the latest on the O'Reilly/Olberman fued-does anyone watch Olberman...
This report by Betsy should be seen on Fox News

Another Operetic Giant Passes


















From the New York Sun today......


Elisabeth Schwarzkopf, who has died at 90, was a lyric soprano whose aristocratic purity of tone and attention to detail made her the supreme female exponent of the songs of Strauss and Wolf and produced some of the most authoritative operatic performances of the postwar era.

In the words of her husband, the British record producer Walter Legge, Schwarzkopf possessed "a brilliant, fresh voice, shot through with laughter, not large but admirably projected, with enchanting high pianissimi". It was Legge who revived the beautiful young singer's career after the embarrassment of her wartime association with the Nazi party, and, together with Herbert von Karajan, encouraged her to develop a formidable gift for characterization that only occasionally spilled over into artfulness.

During the peak of her operatic career in the 1950s and 1960s, Schwarzkopf concentrated on five roles: Donna Elvira in "Don Giovanni," the Countess in "The Marriage of Figaro," Fiordiligi in "Cosi fan tutte," Countess Madeleine in "Capriccio," and, above all, the Marschallin in "Der Rosenkavalier." It seemed fitting that four of these characters were noblewomen: Schwarzkopf possessed a patrician manner which, coupled with a generous measure of self-esteem, earned her the reputation of opera's most intimidating grande dame.

Many of the great opera singers from the golden age of opera, the 1950's, 1960's and 1970's are passing on in the early years of the 21st Century. Although the opera world has morphed into something new, something appropriate for the technological age in the last twenty years, these golden years of the opera may never be matched for the quality of singing and the appeal to a wider public audience. Anyone who has ever heard Schwarzkopf sing Mozart would know that she was one of the premier interpretors of his music to ever appear on the scene. She had the voice of angel, perfectly spinning the expansive Mozartian spinto melodies into the soaring, even angelic heights imagined by the master of eighteenth century musical theater. The world will miss Elizabeth Schwarzkopf.

Lots more in The New York Times

Playbill Arts has the story

Lost LaChanze


After a wonderful recent visit to Broadway where I discovered to my dismay that many stars are not playing a regular schedule of shows, I expressed outrage in several forums. While many fans of Broadway stars seem to have joined forces with Broadway Producers to keep this information from the public, The New York Post let loose today with a fabulous article, "Lost LaChanze." Michael Riedel expresses it in the leading paragraphs of his story.

A hiker in the Himalayas has a better chance of spotting a snow leopard than a theatergoer at "The Color Purple" has of seeing its Tony-winning star, LaChanze.

The actress, who got glowing reviews for her portrayal of the oppressed girl turned pants-making lesbian, Celie, hasn't given a full week's worth of performances since the awards show in June.

The week after the Tonys, she missed three out of eight performances, and now drops one or two shows a week.


WOW! It's hard to believe that this truthful article made it into the Post today. Although internet posters are outraged, at least the public will know that LaChanze will likely not be there if the pay $80, $112, $150, or $250 for their ticket. There needs to be more of a standard when stars are on the boards. Last week alone the following performers missed shows without any notice or formal announcement: Beth Leavel, John Lloyd Young, LaChanze, Lillias White, and Obba Babatunde. This irresponsible behavior qualifies for outrage of the week.

Footnote: Actor Wayne Brady seems to have an unfulfilled commitment to the Broadway Bound revival of THE WIZ at LaJolla Playhouse in San Diego. What's up with these divas of the theater world?

Another Footnote: Here are a couple of comments from a thread on Broadway World that is highlighted by a disscussion of this topic. Some of these postings are blunt, but accurate!

This whole thing is bulls**t.Why do you pursue a career in the theatre? To perform, to act, to inter-act with the cast and the audience.

To LaC, Donna M., and others, unless you have the flu or there is a death in the family, you get your ass onto the stage and WORK! There are hundreds/thousands of men and women dying to get a role in any show let alone a lead in a Bway musical.

There should be language in contracts that reduce the star's salary for each missed performance. Then we will see how many perfs are missed in future.

I know the board is littered with these types of posts, but I couldn't resist putting in my two cents (for what it's worth). First of all, I'm a high school teacher. If I missed two or three days of work each week, I wouldn't have my job for long. I also think my job is demanding. I deal with almost 100 teenagers everday and have found that this week my voice is shot. But I didn't miss work. Why must we always skirt the real issue? If performing is your "job" then you need to do whatever you need to do to make sure that you're at work as much as possible. When I go to see a show, I pay good money. I want the LaChanzes and Donna Murphys of the world to be on. Tell my why performing in a show is any more difficult than working in a factory, working as a teacher, or working as an administrative assistant? I know we all must take a day off every now and again. It just seems like certain performers do it way too much.

You are 1000% right.

My God, teachers, doctors, firemen, cops, construction workers, etc. Do they wake up in the morning and say "gee, I broke a nail, I am not going to work"? Hell no!

The truth is acting is a 'special' profession and all actors as well as people behind the scenes owe their livings to the public who sees them and the producers who sign their checks. I will not consider myself to live a less than fulfilled life if I stop seeing theatre. I go as a choice and if I have the money.

In return I expect to see the original cast; I have every right to a refund if the star is not there. Just like your students have the right to see you, not a substitute!

Check out Stop The ACLU
This Story Belongs in the Mudville Gazette

Thursday, August 03, 2006

The Nutty Professor: Kevin Barrett

Update: More in the Chicago Tribune. Too bad this story couldn't happen in Xenia, then XEA would have to defend this nut!

Professor Kevin Barrett of the University of Wisconsin believes that September 11, 2001 was an inside job performed by the American Government. He has been making apperances around some of the cable shows, yet we had missed it up until this morning when we observed Professor Barrett tangle with the lovely E.D. Hill on this morning's Fox and Friends. I wish there were a video avaialble of this exchange with E.D. She was wonderful.

Although the headline is ridiculous, you can see "Professor" Barrett on Hannity and Colmes the other night by clicking in this link. In addition, author Steve Chapman at the National Ledger summarizes the current circumstance in his recent article.


The tension erupted into open hostilities recently at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, which discovered that one of its instructors has an unorthodox view of recent history. Kevin Barrett, who teaches a course on Islam, thinks the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, were "an inside job" masterminded by the Bush administration to justify U.S. aggression in the Middle East.

If you advocate this theory on the street corner or the Internet, you can count on being ignored. But if you propound it on a college campus, you will not lack for attention. When Barrett went on a local radio show and said he had addressed the subject in class, he raised up a mass movement of Wisconsinites who thought he shouldn't be allowed to mop the floors at the state's flagship university, much less contaminate the promising minds of its students.

The revelation confirmed the widespread view of Madison, and its famously liberal university, as "76 square miles surrounded by reality." Some 27 state legislators signed a petition denouncing Barrett. The speaker of the House warned that the school could face punishment in the form of funding cuts if it kept him on.

Said U.S. Rep. Mark Green, a Republican who is running for governor, "Not a dime of either taxpayer or tuition dollars should be going to Kevin Barrett so he can tell students that September 11 was a creation of the government, and that the most murdering terrorist organization in the world is a myth created by the CIA.

It is amazing that these unhinged, liberal kooks appear almost weekly in the news media. Barrett is a caricature in the manner of a Howard Dean, Cynthia McKinney or Ward Churchill. The conservatives need these people, who are not afraid to represent the true liberal viewpoints to remain in the public view for a good long time. WOW! What a country.

The meaning of the word "professor" has been truly stretched to the extremities at the 21st Century University Campus.

Read all about it in this "puff piece" at the Treason Times which attempts to focus the debate around academic freedom.

Here is another puff piece represented on YouTube from the program For The Record. This public service program is nothing more than an free opportunity for the Professor to guest lecture. Professor Barrett epouses his unhinged viewpoint in the manner of a Karl Marx propaganda artist. He also reminds me of "Baghdad Bob" when the US Army was breathing down his neck.

Black Five has more information straight from Wisconsin
Centerfield has a great piece on this topic, Ann Althouse seems to be the authority of note on this topic, Check out this story in The Capital Times in Madison,
Glenn Reynolds has it right at Instapundit, More from Ann Althouse. Travellers on the path of Knowledge has another view. Carol Platt Liebau has another view from Wisconsin.


Media Created Controversy of the Week

The faux outrage over Mel Gibson's anit-semtic comments has reached a hysterical wattage without regard for the serious events occurring in the world today. While the comments were totoally inappropriate, Mr. Gibson has admitted his mistakes. He admits to being drunk, and he admits that he embarrassed himself. Mel Gibson accomplished in a few hours what it took Congressman Kennedy days to admit in dribs and drabs without ever disclosing the full story.

The response of the press for Patrick Kennedy:total forgiveness and understanding. The response for Mel Gibson:elite, snobbish experts denouncing him for hours on televsion! The so-called experts are saying he should never work in Hollywood again. A google search titled, "Mel Gibson-anti-semite" returned over three million results.

Father Jonathon Morris seems to have a well-founded perspective on this situation. "But let’s remember what “buzz” is. It’s viral-like gossip about what might be. In this case, the buzz in the newspapers, television, and particularly on the web has turned from what might have happened (Mel was quick to confirm the reports), to what the incident might mean.

Abraham Foxman, president of the Anti-Defamation League, was keen to push the envelope in these suppositions.

“His tirade finally reveals his true self and shows that his protestations during the debate over his film 'The Passion of the Christ,' that he is such a tolerant, loving person, were a sham. This confirms what all of us knew before, Mel Gibson is an anti-Semite and a bigot."

I speak confidently and unambiguously, because my experience in working on "The Passion" taught me something else about Mel. While some people are willing to put on facades and give a good “spin” to save face and a career, Mel Gibson cannot. He is painfully honest and incapable of writing or approving a public relations piece in which he does not believe whole-heartedly."

Check out Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity speaking truth about the overblown media response to this overblown media controversy. .
Perish The Thought has more Ann Coulter News-Great Blog!
Bryan Preston puts the situation in proper perspective.
Jay Tea has the right thoughts over at Wizbang
TMH Bacon Bits expresses our thoughts better than we do
Check out the Mudville Gazette

Wednesday, August 02, 2006

Rather on O'Reilly

A smug looking Dan Rather appeared with Bill O’Reilly tonight on the program The O’Reilly Factor. He was offering his expertise on war coverage. Rather said that he doesn’t think that it is widely understood that Israel now essentially has a border with Iran since Hezbollah is doing the bidding of Iran. WOW! This was a powerful statement of unvarnished truth from Mr. Rather. It is an interesting and wholly accurate way to view this situation. Too bad this view is not widely held in the mainstream (drive-by) media.

Mr. Rather stated emphatically that Hezbollah is a terrorist organization committed to the total destruction of Israel. Rather joined in the criticism and included himself in the criticism of the some elements of the media of portraying the radical Islamists and Israelis in this current war.

Bill O’Reilly cited the hatred that the war opposition has brought to the so-called war debate. Rather says the hatred goes both ways. The Dan started to show his real liberal colors. Mr. Rather accused the Bush supporters of hating the liberals. He blamed the Bush crowd and the Republicans for the polarization of the American character.

While Bill O’Reilly claimed that the Bush haters are four times as vindictive, vitriolic, and malicious as the crowd who despised Bill Clinton, Rather disagreed strongly.

Mr. Rather said Fidel Castro is a Dictator. Dano admitted that he is not an expert. Rightfully, he claims that the “Cuban Government” is playing out the post Castro era to see how it will play in world opinion. The former anchorman is going to be working on what he calls a hard-hitting news program, a HD internet program.

Hey, at least Rather admitted, unlike Congressman John Dingle, that Hezbollah is a terrorist organization

More at News Busters!

Too Darn Hot

If you have the chance, listen to "Steam Heat" from the Pajama Game, or "Too Darn Hot" from Kiss Me Kate. It's really hot in New York City, and here are some links that are at least marginally related to the heat wave in NYC.

The New York Daily News says it's "Hard To Shake The Big Bake."

"Dog Daze of Simmer" in the New York Post

Heat Strains Power Grid in the New York Times, Bacon Break, The Jersey Boys Blog has a "red-hot" interview with Daniel Reichard-it's wonderful.

This is really hot: The Son of Bin Laden freed to go to Lebanon.

Georgia Considerettes says its time for a vacation before School begins on, get this:August 14!
Mike in Texas says that he starts on August 7! WOW! Summer is short!

MsUnderestimated has a great post on Cynthia's McKinney's hot debate with her challenger, Hank Johnson. You have to laugh! I agree with Neal Boortz that a McKinney win is good for all of the rest of us as she would continue in her role as the leading democrat buffoon.

A Shimmering History Lesson

The Tony Award Winning Broadway Production of "The History Boys" appeals to teachers and students of all ages. With only nine weeks left, it's time to catch this fabulous production that remains in great shape on the Great White Way. These are History Lessons you'll never forget.

read more | digg story

Wednesday Ghost Light



Michelle Malkin has the story on Jack Murtha getting sued! I can't think of anyone more deserving. Read the details in the The Washington Post.

Eric Kephas has the latest on the Blackwell/Strickland race. Eric says exactly what the data shows, and what I have been thinking in this race.

Betsy Newmark
illustrates for us why the United States can't really work with the French.

The BullWinkle Blog
has more insight into the Murtha scandal. Maybe Congressman Murtha will think twice before committing Treason again!

SeeDubya at The Junk Yard Blog
has an interesting take on Hezbollah drawing the foul. The media never seems to side with the good guys.

Check out this week's Carnival of Education at This Week in Education. The Ferris Wheel Carnival is a perfect image for this time of year. For all you Fair Tax fans, you need to see the latest at two blogs: The Fair Tax Blog, and The Buzz Blog. There is a wealth of great readin at both sites!

You won't believe what John Kerry is saying now
. Tim Russert is hoping for huge democrat gains this Fall.

A Chorus Line officially opens in San Francisco tonight.
Apparently, John Lloyd Young returned to Jersey Boys last night after a week off for vocal rest. Anyone that has the time on inclination should head off to Broadway to catch this great show. Get ready to pay some big bucks.

Tuesday, August 01, 2006

A Shimmering History Lesson



Thespis Review: The History Boys on Broadway

The topic of exploiting an idealistic classroom as a backdrop for making moral and political statements is a widely used technique for those creators of entertainment searching for a canvas rich with dramatic potential. The classic and colossal struggle between the generations is heightened when the battle is set in a classroom. An element of Drama exists in every vibrant classroom full of teen-agers. A progressive, interactive dynamic between the teacher and his students is a distinguishing characteristic manifest in an authentic learning environment. This fundamental premise of education is vividly demonstrated in the brilliant script and compelling performance of the Tony Award winning play, The History Boys, currently playing at the Broadhurst Theater in New York City.

Playwright Alan Bennett’s latest offering plenteously illustrates an on-going, relevant battle of educational philosophy. While some distracting plot devices nearly confuse the point., the debate in educating young people today is more alive today than it was twenty years ago-the setting of the play. While Bennett is clearly making some innovative commentary on contemporary British views of the meaning of education, he involuntarily enjoins the current and intense American debate regarding sterile, test laden approaches to education versus a comprehensive educational program encompassing the lessons of life.

On the surface, the play is about a provincial British boys' school preparing its lads for college in the '80s. The History Boys is really about two approaches to history - one anecdotal, ironic, genial, indeed chivalrous; the other cynical, calculating and ruthless.

The former is personified by Hector, a ludicrously overweight, elderly, profoundly jolly man who instructs his pupils in Noel Coward as well as the French subjunctive. British actor Richard Griffiths gives the performance of a lifetime as the multi-faceted Hector. He is dark, sardonic, sarcastic, derisive, intellectual, caring, and warm. Hector is a study in contrast, and like many truly brilliant people has a darker side too. His habit of having one the boys ride home with him on his motorcycle leads to charges of fondling, and provides the plot twist that catalyzes the dramatic instant into the confusion of having Hector dismissed from his position as teacher. All of this happens on the eve of their admittance into exclusive universities.

Irwin, a guest teacher and Hector’s counterpart is younger, trimmer and smoother. Irwin teaches the boys that the path to the better universities lies in taking perverse views. (The audience first sees Irwin explaining how the abolition of trial by jury can be seen as a way to strengthen liberty.)
Irwin's mind-set prevails, which is easy to see as Bennett's sardonic comment on contemporary England. But it is Hector's teaching that captivates us. At moments you can hear a pin drop when Hector has the boys act out the final scene of "Now, Voyager." Alternatively, we experience uproarious laughter when Hector asks the boys to play prostitutes in a French brothel as a technique to get them to practice their French grammar.

In the course of more than two hours, Mr. Bennett provides us a veritable banquet of scrumptious lesson plans for History. There are multidimensional characters that are endearing and genuinely interesting. Not unlike many of the groups of lively, charming, and endearing boys that make up a men’s chorus, these History Boys are crackling and popping with snappy one-liners and refined humor that is slightly coarse and sublimely witty.

Of The Boys, Posner, played by Samuel Barnett gives us the most ample character. Barnett is at once, sensitive, confused, humorous, engaging, and longing. Dominic Cooper, who plays the campus Casanova, Dakin, is an actor who is breathtakingly insightful and perceptive. Mr. Cooper is compelling without being overbearing, and he makes us believe in the prowess, plaintiveness, and humor of Dakin. The actors give the entire evening a credibility that is positively amazing.

In a series of rapid, striking and vivid scenes, there is a marriage of actors and playwright that is rarely seen on Broadway today. The musical interludes with Jamie Parker as Scripps at the piano, and Samuel Barnett often soloing are a remarkable contribution to the luminosity and effervescence lingering in the footlights of this production. All of the minor artistic touches bring an ethereal quality to this delicate production which plays like a celestial breath of fresh air across the landscape of Broadway.

In all, The History Boys is a rapidly paced evening of exceptional theater. Any teacher who teaches his pupils with passion, fervor and boundless enthusiasm will find himself reflected, at times, in several of the characters on stage. The playwright may have serious issues on his mind, but he and the troop of actors who present this show seem to know that at the end of the day, variety, contrasts, and pacing are those factors that most impact on the response of the audience. The playwright and the actors deserve that proverbial bushel of apples for a memorable performance worth seeing more than once late this summer.

Check out the History Boys on Ted Blog
Vincent Vargas reviews The History Boys
Read the review in The New York Post, The Broadway.Com Summary Review, Ben Brantley in the New York Times, The Washington Post, The New York Daily News.

A Dissenting Letter from a Former Student

A thought-provoking letter was recently received here at Thespis Journal from a concerned former student and avid reader of this blog. With the permission of the author, and with great pride in the student, I am re-printing the email letter in total. Christopher Rice is a sophomore at Oberlin University in Ohio.

The response of the Thespis Journal staff will follow.


Dear Thespis Journal,

Let me first start by stating that I am very much a fan of Thespis Journal. I thoroughly enjoy the claims and information presented on both the arts and politics. However, as a reader from Thespis Journal's beginning, I have some questions about its content.

I claim that those at Thespis Journal focus too strongly on the cultural
divide that already exists in America. The red versus the blue, the
liberals versus the conservatives. It is clear to those who even pay
a small amount of attention to American politics today, that America
is polarized. The polarization that exists is apparent through the
strong divide between democrat and republican ideologies, through
extreme media outlets like Fox News and CNN, and through the
blogosphere that has recently developed. As college a student who
stands for and believes in progress and process more than any one
political group's set of ideas, I find it irresponsible and
neglectful, for those intellectual writers on politics, to encourage
America's polarization.

America currently faces a state of crisis.

Thousands of American families are forced to live below the poverty
line, while working full time for five dollars and fifteen cents a
hour, a minimum wage that hasn't been raised for ten years. This
internal problem was especially made clear by Hurricane Katrina.
Those service working Americans of the lower 9th district, who lived
pay check to pay check, couldn't leave if they wanted, they didn't
have the financial means. Thousands of Americans live without health
care. Parents are faced with the choice to miss a days work without
pay or stay home and take of their child, a choice no parent should
have to make. And I doubt those earning minimum wage can afford a
trip to emergency room without health insurance at $500 a visit.

Public schools across the country are under funded and are failing to
meet federal standards, while college and university tuition
continues to rise. Internationally America is losing support and its
ability to influence other countries. We are in a war without an
exit strategy under false pretenses, and more and more foreign
countries are becoming threats.


Is now not the time America needs to come together more than it
ever has before?
I question what good blogs like these can do to
unite our country. I'm not here to blame. Both the right and left are
guilty of this distracting propaganda. For example, you strongly
support author Ann Coulter and recently described her as creative,
original, and colorful. To me this very accurately depicts a great
cartoon character. A character that is completely over the top and
outlandish, however, the same can be said of authors on the left side
of things.

But why isn't there more support and more mainstream
support to bring America together? Haven't the actions or lack of
action from congress and the president and his administration proven
enough for the need to put differences aside and support progress.


This brings me to my second point of discussion. What is your and
your reader’s opinion of the conservative and republican leader
President Bush? Have his approval ratings dropped even too low for
the very people who fought so adamantly for his false election and
his re-election? It seems like conservatives have attempted to
completely remove themselves from any ties they might have had with
the President.

I only ask that those who supported him to recognize
where their support once lied. In conclusion, my main point of
concern is the cultural war in America and the polarization America
faces. Please help me to understand the role Thespis Journal and
blogs similar to these can help in our tremendous need for progress.

Christopher Rice

Thanks for the email Chris! We are happy to post your letter and to respond.

First, blogging is an opportunity to vent and express one’s frustration with topics that are limited only by the blog owner/author and perhaps his team of writers. It is an opportunity to foster debate, further the discussion, and a privilege that comes with being a private citizen. It is the freedom to write what we want to write, and hopefully someone else will read it. We at Thespis Journal are not policy makers, in fact, we attempt to influence those who are making policy by being politically active and influencing the debate. As bloggers, we have very different roles than those who are elected leaders.

I am not sure that your term of “cultural divide” applies to the contrasting political philosophies that compete to run our nation’s government. There are many Caucasions and African-Americans on both sides of the conservative vs. liberal debate. All cultures are represented on both sides of the fundamental political debate, and while the ratios may be disproportionate on one side or the other, the political debate today is not really about a cultural divide.

Your larger point is quite noble. Bringing people together to solve problems rather than constantly bashing one another is a pleasant thought, and reflects the idealism of your youth. We need idealists. America needs fresh and creative spirits to bring about change all across the United States. The views of a few bloggers shouldn’t stop anyone wishing to work for a better society and a more effective government.

One of the qualities that make answering your letter so worthwhile is the opportunity to respond to the talking points of the left which you so capably articulate. No one is forced to live in poverty. There are countless examples of rugged individualists making a life for themselves and their families in our capitalist economy. The Katrina victims were let down by their local and state officials in an unbelievable series of abject failures. The poverty that existed in New Orleans was not really news at the time-just look at any edition of the Times-Picayune. Governors Bush of Florida, Barbour of Mississippi, and of Alabama had none of the problems that overwhelmed Governor Blanco of Louisiana.

Columnist Charles Krauthammer said it best about Mayor “Chocolate City” Nagin:

"The mayor of New Orleans. He knows the city. He knows the danger. He knows that during Hurricane Georges in 1998, the use of the Superdome was a disaster and that fully two-thirds of the residents never got out of the city. Nothing was done. He declared a mandatory evacuation only 24 hours before Hurricane Katrina hit. He did not even declare a voluntary evacuation until the day before that, at 5 p.m. At that time, he explained that he needed to study his legal authority to call a mandatory evacuation and was hesitating to do so lest the city be sued by hotels and other businesses."

I would like to call your attention to all of these links regarding what really happened in New Orleans. Simply regurgitating the agenda of victimization forced upon us by the mainstream media, let’s remember the truth that escaped from New Orleans despite the best efforts of Chris Matthews, Anderson Cooper, Geraldo Rivera, and Shepherd Smith.

Waiting for John Wayne in the American Thinker
The Mudville Gazette
The American Spectator
Charles Krauthammer

There are many other articles and ideas to be found which soundly debunk the stories coming out of New Orleans last September.

At Thespis Journal, we strongly support President Bush. No polling is necessary to help us determine our political philosophy. We support President Bush for two over-arching issues facing our nation today: Taxes and the War on Terror. President Bush has been unwavering in his positions on both of these fundamental issues. September 11, 2001 changed our world forever, and while liberals constantly present themselves as the voice of appeasement and cut and run, Bush has stood firm in his belief that Terror must not be tolerated. Did America negotiate with Hitler and Hirohito? NO! Hezbollah, Hamas, and Al Quaida must be eliminated wherever they can be found in the world.

Thespis Journal may not be doing any good in out little corner of the world, but it is doubtful that we are doing any harm. Highlighting Ann Coulter, Michelle Malkin, Rush Limbaugh, Charles Krauthammer, Peggy Noonan, and the works of other great thinkers and writers of our day can be a service to others enslaved by the tired hymns of the mainstream media. Our motto: let the dialogue, debate, and ideas flow. It is in this spirit that we have asked Mr. Rice to guest blog whenever he may choose. We welcome his contributions, and we know that these columns will be worthy of being included in Thespis Journal. We might even present both sides of a particular topic every now and then. Imagine this as a new title: Thespis Journal: Fair and Balanced Blogging.