Monday, January 30, 2006

Another Big-Brother Plan for Ohio's Schools

It seems that Governor Taft didn’t do his homework when he proposed another bright idea for students and schools in Ohio. By his own admission, he has no idea at all what his proposal might cost. Additionally, the Governor has no suggestion for properly staffing his own proposal. Surely, all responsible citizens in Ohio must be asking at this point, on what planet does Governor Taft live? The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled Ohio’s abysmal system of funding public education unconstitutional four times. Districts all over Ohio are in financial collapse, yet Governor Taft proposes a major overhaul of the high school curriculum without considering the costs, or without any concept at all of staffing his so-called rigorous core curriculum. The Governor’s statements on this matter reveal an appalling lack of practically, and total vacancy of knowledge surrounding the academic profile of many of Ohio’s students. The proposal is also ridden with archaic, yet socially acceptable prejudices regarding the visual and performing arts, technology education, and several universally recognized fundamental curricular areas. Governor Taft’s proposal represents the typical politician’s response to all of the problems facing public education in Ohio: it is a big-brother mandate constructed with the one-size-fits-all approach that has little or nothing to do with the goal of providing a well-rounded quality education curriculum for all of Ohio’s students. When we hear all of this hot air emanating forth in Columbus we know how to respond-look out!

Governor Taft’s plan looks something like this: The "Ohio Core," as Taft calls it, would be four years of math, including Algebra II; three years of science, including biology, chemistry and physics; four years of English; three years of social studies; and at least two years of a foreign language The plan would make the completion of the curriculum a condition of admission to Ohio's state-funded, four-year colleges and universities. Sounds great doesn’t it?

Sure, high standards are great. We applaud this hollow effort to sound the call for rigorous academic standards. But, how does this proposal relate to the average Ohio student? Many students are already completing and exceeding this basic curriculum. Districts have been scrambling to align standards with the newer high stakes tests mandated by No Child Left Behind. While some students struggle to pass the test, the Governor has decided to create another hurdle and red tape for all students.

Furthermore, not all students will fit into the Governor’s square peg. Intellectual and mature students sometimes have other noble and laudable goals that do not include the over-indulgence of heavy science and mathematics. Painters, producers, artisans, chefs, psychologists, musicians, dancers, actors, singers, designers, and several other wonderful career fields and vocations do not require that a student major in upper level math and science courses. In fact, the Governor seems to believe that Algebra II is the only method of teaching critical thinking skills. Well, we have a message for the Governor and his ilk.

Higher order thinking skills, creative dexterity, and the development and encouragement of the human imagination are equally as important as physics or chemistry in leading a successful life. And the Governor might not realize that limited resources and a limited school day make it impossible for every student to complete his “Ohio Core” while accessing equally important and life altering, dynamic, and interactive courses in the so-called elective areas. As we strive to teach our students a core curriculum, we are also providing essential life skills, and teaching our students how to lead a productive life.

It is a daunting task, and the politicians never wish to pursue a complicated option, but a portfolio assessment for every high school student would be the most thorough and meticulous method of insuring success. A comprehensive assessment package would guarantee that students reach strong core curricular goals in tandem with a career path and artistic and creative pursuits. It’s easier to sell the public and the broad-brush politicians with slogans and neatly wrapped ideas that ignore the reality of today’s school and society.

It would be a fair and sensible sentence to require all of Ohio’s legislators and statewide officials to a year or more of public service in a school as a teacher with a classroom full of students. For a few days, it would be fun, and then reality would begin to set it on these talking heads.

It would be great to have new leadership in Ohio that would stop the unfunded mandates and rigid edicts coming from Columbus. It is time for a realistic assessment of Ohio’s schools and dynamic leadership to move us into the future. In the meantime, could we place a moratorium on propaganda, flimsy, un-researched ideas, and overblown, political cheap shots? Our students all deserve our best, not more out of tune warbling and despicable political posturing.

Scott Elliot of the Dayton Daily News is on the story
Read more at Red Orbit

Sunday, January 29, 2006

Blog On Great Bloggers!

Friends in the blogosphere have given solid support through comments and email as blogging time has grown short around here. We are continually amazed at the volume and quality of work at other outstanding blogs. Ten to twenty daily reads along with newspapers and the Fox News Channel provide a days worth of news coverage, and lend a balanced perspective on the things that are truly important in our city, state, and and nation.

With the mainstream media focusing additional time and disproportionate resources in setting a news and political agenda, bloggers contribute the invaluable and unique insights and commentary that balance the liberal agenda of the coastal elite. When schedules are harrowing and time short, it is easy to fall victim to the Katie Couric/Matt Lauer/Chris Matthews/John McCain/Larry King/Oprah Winfrey/CBS News/David Letterman view of the world. As thinking people, we must always guard against permitting liberal elites from establishing the only important stories in our world. The mainstream media takes compulsory cues from the folks at The New York Times, a newspaper that often demonstrates a total disregard for significant and essential news items.

We have been engaged in a colliquy with the contributors at a wonderful blog, Perish The Thought regarding the future of blogging. Please read their posts on the matter, it is all thought-provoking and meaningful.

Here are some of the comments I have shared with these wonderful people.
I think that there will be a strong blogger influence for at least the next ten years or more. The authors and contributors might change, but it is an excellent outlet for those of us without others to listen to our constant rants on various topics.
I have only been blogging since September. Doing a good job requires more time than I can give since I work for a living. I am sure that others feel the same.
Hang in there! I have appreciated all of the support and encouragement from those at your wonderful site.

We need partners in blogging to keep everything fresh, updated, and new. I hope that Blogging does not go the way of "mood rings" and "pet rocks" from the 1970's.

Blog on great bloggers! For those readers who get something or anything at all from our posts, it is well worth the effort.
Think of Thomas Payne printing "Common Sense" in colonial America. It is easy to imagine that he and his colleagues had their moments of doubt, questions, and confusion.
Certainly, there are many contributors in today's blogosphere with the same raw, unscripted, authentic, and brazen ideals of Thomas Payne.
Surely, there is a small audience of readers for any well constructed blog.

I appreciate and love the reader feedback as much as anyone. On the days when I have spent an entire day researching and writing, yet only 68 unique users looked at Thespis Journal, I swore to quit writing for such few people. However, I awake the next day with more ideas for articles, and more interest than ever in being a successful blogger.
I am always looking for a way to make a singular contribution that someone will think is particularly useful and insightful in its' approach.
Some other bloggers seem to have "kissed off" and demeaned some of our best posts while others have been kind and supportive. It is as frustrating and as worthwhile as every other major undertaking in my lifetime.

There are so many great columns, blogs, video, commentary, and comedy available on the internet. I enjoy being one more reasonable voice in the American tapestry of free speech. You never know who may be reading, benefitting, disagreeing, or enjoying.

As I said earlier, Blog on great Bloggers! It is important and vital work in the great machinery of the pioneering American Spirit.

Thespis

John Kerry Raises Ann Coulter's Profile!

In a bizzare speech calling for the fillibuster of Samuel Alito's nomination to the Supreme Court, Senator John Kerry attacked Ann Coulter on the floor of the United States Senate on Friday. Kerry is showing strong similarities to Al Gore (the other major failed democrat Presidential Candidate) in becoming Unhinged!

Kerry's fillibuster attempt and all the accompanying speeches seem to be his most recent effort to re-assert his dominance of the democrat party. Since no Senator since John Kennedy in 1960 has risen to the Presidency from the senate, Kerry's foolish attempt to run for President from the floor of the US Senate seems ridiculous. Hillary Clinton may be able to pull off the Presidency while a senator, but she is in a vastly different league than Kerry.

Kerry can not become the nominee again by attacking Ann Coulter. He looks petty, radical, extreme, and has lowered his already paultry stature to a whining child who debates columnists. No President ever does this! Poor Kerry-he will likely spend the rest of his remaining days trying to win the minds of the voters, yet he will suffer the same fate as Al Gore: the American people have placed both of these fringe politicians on indefinate "ignore" for the forseeable future.

Ian has the video at the political teen.


By the way, Go Ann! She is truly a leader and spokesperson for many conservatives in American. Check out her latest at Ann Coulter.com

Saturday, January 28, 2006

All Hail Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart at 250!



Did you do anything special to Celebrate Mozart's 250th Birthday on Friday, January 27? All hail Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, an unsurpassed genius and child prodigy whose brilliant music has permeated western culture for the last two hundred years, and thrives today in countless performances world-wide.

Having played several early piano compositions of Mozart, and having sung many Mozart Aria's, Duets, and Operetic Ensembles, I have long been a devotee of Mozart. Mozart's music, especially his operas, are infinately more intriguing musically and dramatically than any of his contemporaries. For singers, there is that specific Mozart sound for both men and women which reflects the healthiest and brightest of natural singing.

The finale from Act II of The Marriage of Figaro is one the greatest ensembles ever written. This highly structured, multi-layered selection that begins as a duet for the Count and the Countess evolves majestically into muliple voices and characters that exude the essential meaning of arched classical vocal lines ripe with limitless thematic development into an enrapturing, sonorous conclusion.

Undoubtedly, Mozart's music will continue to influence western society and culture for another 250 years. His celestial music will always be a beacon of greatness with Mozart having accomplished in his 35 short years the stature of being a giant among giants.

All Hail Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

Michelle Malkin has a wonderful post on W. A. Mozart.
Read about Cecilia Bartoli replacing Renee Fleming at the Huge Mozart Celebration in Vienna.
A Fabulous article in the New York Times. A wonderful article at Playbill Arts.
This Mozart site is very interesting.
From Opera News: March 4, 1957.

Monday, January 23, 2006

Where, Oh Where

We have had a couple of email messages asking if everything is ok. Yes, everything is ok. Life is hectic.

Blogging will be light for at least the next few days. There are many complications with our staff schedules. Producing a qaulity educational theater experience for students and audience, negotiating a master contract, teaching five classes per day, preparation for other performances, meeting the obligations of a Director of Music position, and keeping up with life at the 1896 Victorian Bed and Breakfast are consuming most of our time.

There is much good out there in the blogosphere to read and see. Enjoy any and all of the great sites that we regularly link with. Hope to see you soon. Keep checking in.

Thespis


Saturday, January 21, 2006

Thespis Journal Presents Posts of the Week

What a week! Moon-Bat Monday (Aka Martin Luther King Day, 2006) provided an unlimted number of posts and columns from which to select. We hope you enjoy all of the wonderful reading. Use this reading list to accompany your Sunday brunch and all of your weekend reading. We welcome suggestions for Post of the Week. Please email chanticleer148@yahoo.com. The editors and staff writers put a lot of items on the table this week for consideration.

Without any further delay:

10. Another Reason to Celebrate: By Doug at Below The Beltway

Doug offers us the history of the Reagan Presidency and the impact of Ronald Reagan on American life and culture still today. This is a marvelous and quick read.

9. This Day in History: By John Noonan at The Officers Club

John Noonan provides with a terrific summary of the watershed historical moment of January 20, 1981. This momentous day is commemorated in a wonderful piece at a beautiful web log.

8. Christie Vs. Sharpton on Hardball: By Ms. Underestimated

Using her fabulous new web site as a foundation, Ms. Underestimated highlights the latest shenanigans on Chris Matthew’s “Softball.” Ron Christie, former Bush advisor, faced off against the liberal freak, Al Sharpton to discuss all the events of Moonbat Monday (AKA Martin Luther King Day, 2006). Ms. Underestimated’s video and highlight are one of the greatest analysis pieces of everything that went wrong for the democrats this past Monday.

7. Nagin Gets Medieval: By Bryan Preston at Junk Yard Blog

Bryan expounds on the entire Ray Nagin debacle of calling for New Orleans to be a “chocolate city,” and Nagin’s statement that God is “mad at America.” Bryan is wonderful as always.

6. A Case of Techno-Cluelessness: By Scott Elliot at Get on The Bus

Scott Elliot of the Dayton Daily News “busts out” NEA President Reg Weaver for his lack of Internet savvy. This is a major issue for a union representing over 2.5 million education employees. If Scott is correct, the NEA Executive Officers and Staff need to address this issue immediately.

5. People Don’t Want 50-50 Leadership: By The Anchoress

The Anchoress has a long quotation from another article, but she highlighted a very important story in Ohio and national politics. Her entire site is always worth visiting.

4. Malkin Calls Out Tin Foil Hat Wearers: at Right Winged
In this compilation of other posts with original commentary, the author at Right Winged combines photo shop humor with statements of Walter Cronkite, Jack Cafferty, and Dan Rather. It is truly hilarious!

3. Matthews Lies About Laura Bush Saying, “God Wants New Orleans Rebuilt”:

By Ian Schwartz at the Political Teen
I sometimes think that Ian should subtitle his spectacular Blog “Hard-Blogger: the Truth Uncovered” for his dogged coverage of Chris Matthews foolishness.” Thanks Ian for setting Chris straight again. “Hardball” has more gaffes than any other cable news program every week!

2. In Full Retreat: Liberals Charge Rearward, By DL at TMH Bacon Bits

DL makes a great case against the liberals: “One of the great benefits of teaching elementary school is that it truly prepares you to understand the mindset of the liberal. There is hardly a move they make that hasn’t been tried daily throughout the country, in one or another elementary school by some kid, trying to deceive a teacher.
For decades Democrats have imposed their political will through judicialfiat (Roe v. Wade) and they have for years successfully defied anyone to challenge their rights to do so. Not any longer!"

1. Ronald Reagan: A Personal Reflection: By Pat Santy at Dr. Sanity
A wonderful personal memory from Pat Santy regarding her encounter with President Ronald Reagan at the time of the Challenger Disaster in January, 1986. Dr. Santy is wonderfully forthcoming and genuine in this article. This keeps Dr. Sanity at the top of our list!

Other wonderful posts and columns of note and interest:

The Spellings Report: A Kinder, Gentler Secretary? By The Education Wonks
Bill’s Hill’s Shill Causes Chills: By LaShawn Barber
Basil’s Picnic: By Basil at Basil’s Blog
Gore’s Challenge: By David S. Broder in The Washington Post
On Ripping The Universe a New One: at Perish The Thought
Outside The Beltway
Right Wing Nation
Reagan Revolution Weekend Trackbacks at Stop The ACLU
“Why We Need A Border Wall” by The Sensible Mom
Rove Outlines 2006 GOP Strategy: By Captain Ed at Captain’s Quarters
Check out Ian's Latest!, TMH Bacon Bits-read more! Reasons I Keep Blogging
A Quarter Century of Conservatism at the Strata-Sphere WOW!
There are tons of links at the Mudville Gazette!

Fosse/Liza Collaboration Restored

All fans of the Broadway musical, and Broadway history will be thrilled to hear that a very famous 1972 made for television/live presentation starring Liza Minnelli fully staged for a live theater audience and filmed by Bob Fosse has been restored, and will be seen again. Of course, we are hopeful for the DVD, so we can all see it soon. It is set to air on Showtime later this year.

The infamous "Liza With A Z!" was the creation of Fosee, Minnelli, and the Broadway composing team of Kander and Ebb.This amazing team had just completed work on the film version of the Broadway hit Cabaret earlier in 1972. That same year, eager to work together once more, they collaborated on a TV concert special, "Liza With a Z," filmed at Broadway's Lyceum theater in a one-shot, no-retakes, high-energy performance with Minnelli, dancers and an orchestra.

This legendary performance was canonized and highlighted in the 1999 Tony-Award winning musical FOSSE with several numbers from the "Liza With a Z" special being included in the three-act tribute to the work of Bob Fosse. This legendary television special won several Emmy Awards, and has been considered "lost" for a number of years. It will be a singular thrill for many of us to see it for the first time.

I will post more links throughout the day as I am able to find them.

The New York Daily News

Reagan's 25th Anniversary

Although it is almost over, today, January 20, 2006 marks the 25th anniversary since the inauguration of Ronald Reagan as President of the United States. I remember that day all too well, and eveidently so do many others as the blogosphere was lit up today with many well deserved tributes to the Gipper. The glow of Ronald Reagan and his presidency gets brighter each year, and like a fine wine, the memory of Ronald and Nancy Reagan grows richer and more intense with the passing of time.

January 20, 1981 was a miraculous day. The first Presidential Inauguration to be held on the West Front of the Capital building marked a day of new hope in the United States. Hostages that had been held in Iran since November, 1979, a story which had gripped our nation for more than a year, were released in dramatic fashion on that day as well. The pictures were fantasitical and almost unbelievable.


The world has changed in my lifetime, but after visiting the Reagan library this past summer, I am more comvinced than ever that Ronald Reagan was the finest President of the 20th Century. His legacy of winning the cold war, revitalizing the Unites States economy, and making America great again will live on for the next century. America has seen many great eras in its' history, but those glorious Reagan years will live on as profoundly growing and changing times for our nation. Ronald Reagan's stature will only grow in the many years to come.

Here's to the great memory of Ronald Reagan, and to the memory of that great day, January 20, 1981.

Check out the many links.
Below The Beltway has a great post today! Look at Right Wing Nation
A Paul Beston article at the Amercian Spectator
A Day of Anniversaries at The Political Teen
This Day in History at The officer's Club
TMH Bacon Bits has a round-up of the Anniversary
Dr. Sanity's Personal Refelction is wonderful!
Check out the links at The Mudville Gazette
Still Morning in America: The Wall Street Journal
Peggy Noonan: Not A Bad Time to Take Stock

Wednesday, January 18, 2006

The Jerry Springer, Al Gore, Ray Nagin, Hillary Clinton, Jack Murtha America

It seems that the latest liberal tactic for winning the American voter doesn’t involve any new ideas or impressive policy debates. These democrats say that they want to take back the congress and take back the White House. We don’t doubt it.

From Al Gore to Hillary Clinton, there seems to be a contest for the office of liberal leader, and the path to this coveted title seems to be a competition of who will make the most strident, harsh, discordant, and raucous, comment of the moment. Making the most colorful comment means winning the adulation and admiration of the mainstream media who are always waiting in the wings to anoint the story of the moment.

Of course, Howard Dean seems to be the grandfather of this most recent fad in political speech making, and look at his rising career.

With their allies in the media ready to amplify their latest moon-batery, Hillary, Al, Ray and Jack seem to wage an artificial battle within their elite clique like smutty high school girls using all their assets to attract the most popular boy.

Their hysterical, unhinged oratory is often laced with electrically charged words designed to create the illusion of a magnetic persona, and to disguise their lackluster political skills. The absence of any philosophical foundation is masked by the transitory and opaque emotional hyper-response from the eagerly waiting media types. The media elite believes their own stories and further deepens their plunge into that cosmic chasm: the liberal unreality bubble.

But, what do regular Americans think? We have become immune to these sob sisters and their sensationalist speech-making. These over-the-top comments no longer pass the smell test. We recognize counterfeit hogwash when we hear it. It an era of too much news from too many sources, it is easy to put these exaggerated voices on permanent mute. After a steady diet of Clinton fast food, the American Voter is ready for the authentic taste of nutritious, home-cooked meals.

When we hear all of this over-baked and under whelming liberal talk, we plan to do like my Mother often told us as children: turn off the noise box! That’s exactly what much of main street America will be doing this political season.

It's no different than all the shouting on Jerry Springer: it gets old really fast!


Check out the Fabulous Ms. UnderEstimated!, Read everything at the new blog Rightwinged,
As usual, the Political Teen Has It All!, As always, The Mudville Gazette is wonderful.
Bryan Preston at Junk Yard Blog has a great piece!
Check out the Beltway Traffic Jam Read Basil's Blog, TMH Bacon Bits is Always Amazing

Tuesday, January 17, 2006

Ten Stuipd Things Said By Liberals-In Just Three Days/Second Edition

“Have you noticed that it has been a remarkable week already? The democrats have left me speechless. It is only Wednesday and the democrats and liberals have had quite a stupid week already! WOW! They exhaust me with their snobbery, theoretical intellectual superiority, and inclination to hold forth on a range of
topics.”

Well, history has a way of repeating itself, and we at Thespis Journal find ourselves on another Tuesday, five weeks later, writing the second edition of “Ten Stupid Things Said By Liberals-In Just Three Days! Welcome to this “carnival of stupidity.”

Senator Diane Feinstein (D-California) leads off second edition of ten stupid things said by liberals. Feinstein was speaking to Bob Sheiffer on Face The Nation.

1. According to Mark Kilmer at Red State, Senator Feinstein engaged in meaningless rambling while on the show. She is voting against Alito. She disagrees with Alito, but he's qualified and disagreements are not a good reason to vote against a nominee. However, she is concerned about the Rehnquist Court. Explain any of that to me…

Senator John McCain takes numbers two and three…John McCain you ask? On a list of ten stupid things said by liberals? Read on…

2. Once again on Face The Nation, McCain said that the Federal Elections Commission is corrupt, because “they keep trying to find loopholes in the McCain-Feingold Law.”

3. Regarding global warming, Senator McCain then stated, "We are doing a terrible thing to this globe, and a terrible thing to future generations." We first have to admit that it's real, he said, and we have to reduce Greenhouse gases. For this, he stated flatly that nuclear power was our best option.

Editors Comment: How many of you reading this posting believe that McCain seems to have nothing better to do than sit with the Sunday morning hosts and make stupid comments?

Number four on the list goes to Hillary Clinton for this brilliant statement at a MLK Day rally. This statement is really stupid.

4. Sounding a little like a preacher, a fired-up Sen. Hillary Clinton lambasted the Bush administration and the Republican-controlled Congress during a Martin Luther King Jr. Day event, predicting the presidency "will go down in history as one of the worst" and saying “the House of Representatives is run like a ‘plantation’ where dissenting voices are squelched.” When you look at the way the House of Representatives has been run, it has been run like a plantation, and you know what I'm talking about," Clinton, D-N.Y., told the crowd at the Canaan Baptist Church of Christ in Harlem.

Editors comment: Oh really, Mrs. Clinton? Is this why we have to endure specifying of the worst degree from Nancy Pelosi, Mad Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson Lee, Cynthia McKinney, and John Murtha all the time?)

5. For number five, we simply can't resist Teddy Kennedy. In the Sunday New York Times, Uncle Teddy Kennedy complained that the judiciary committee process has become too political. Mr. Kennedy said that the nomination process, and particularly the hearings, had "turned into a political campaign," and that the White House had proved increasingly skilled in turning that to its advantage.

Editors Comment: Uncle Teddy, the godfather of politicizing nominations to the Supreme Court (remember his speech titled, “in Robert Bork’s America…?), has real nerve to say that the process is too political.

Walter Cronkite, America’s Anchor Man, provides us with number six on the ten stupid things list when he attempted to replay his treasonous behavior from the Vietnam era.

6. Former CBS anchor Walter Cronkite, whose 1968 conclusion that the Vietnam War was unwinnable keenly influenced public opinion then, said Sunday he'd say the same thing today about Iraq. "It's my belief that we should get out now," Cronkite said in a meeting with reporters.
Several on the left have been begging around to find a "Cronkite moment" that would tip the momentum in Iraq into abject withdrawal, and Cronkite probably figured he was the best person to attempt another Cronkite moment. He proclaimed that it was one of his proudest moments to tell the nation in an anchorman's commentary that the Vietnam War "was unwinnable and that the U.S. should exit.
Editors comment: Maybe Walter Cronkite could go back to the CBS Evening News and resurrect their ratings with his brand of treason.

We were thrilled to see Al Gore return to the public eye with a blistering speech on Monday. He gives us number seven. We are so fortunate that Florida turned out the way it did in 2000.

7. Former Vice President Al Gore asserted Monday that President Bush "repeatedly and persistently" broke the law by eavesdropping on Americans without a court warrant and called for a federal investigation of the practice. "Is America in more danger now than when we faced worldwide fascism on the march - when our fathers fought and won two World Wars simultaneously?" he said. "It is simply an insult those who came before us and sacrificed so much on our behalf to imply that we have more to be fearful of than they."

Editors comment: As usual, Mr. Gore spoke without regard for facts, ethics, or the compelling nature of our current war.

It pains us to give any more ink to John Murtha, but his latest gaffe is too good to pass up for our ten stupid things listing. What will Murtha say next? Here is number eight.

8. "I think the vast majority will be out by the end of the year and I'm hopeful it will be sooner than that," Murtha, a decorated Vietnam combat veteran who retired as a colonel after 37 years in the U.S. Marine Corps, told the CBS "60 Minutes" show. "All of us want this president to succeed ... I feel a mission here, with my experience, that I have to help the president find a way out of this thing."

Editors Comment: Yeah, right, Mr. Murtha….cut and run now! That’s your brilliant strategy.


Numbers nine and ten in our ten stupid things list have to go to America’s favorite mayor, Ray Nagin of New Orleans who seems to have lost it Monday while pontificating extemporaneously during his MLK speech. These comments speak volumes about his mentality.

9. "Surely God is mad at America. He sent us hurricane after hurricane after hurricane, and it's destroyed and put stress on this country," Nagin, who is black, said as he and other city leaders marked Martin Luther King Day. "Surely he doesn't approve of us being in Iraq under false pretenses. But surely he is upset at black America also. We're not taking care of ourselves."
10. "It's time for us to come together. It's time for us to rebuild New Orleans — the one that should be a chocolate New Orleans," the mayor said. "This city will be a majority African American city. It's the way God wants it to be. You can't have New Orleans no other way. It wouldn't be New Orleans."
Editors Comment: We are speechless. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry! The only way to make Nagin’s comments better would be if “Idiot of the Year Blanco” had joined him in making such breath-taking statements.

That’s a wrap for another edition of Ten Stupid Things Said by Liberals-In Just Three Days. We truly hope that you enjoyed it. It’s been great fun, and It should provide all of us with things to comment on for the reminder of the week.
Check out Bryan Preston at JunkYard Blog.

Monday, January 16, 2006

Blackwell Pushes the 65-Cent "Solution"

Isn’t there something called “good judgment” that qualifies a person for adulthood? After years of adolescent thinking and juvenile escapades, a young person finally advances into adulthood. While I am strong Reagan/Bush conservative, I have one phrase for Ohio’s Republican politicians when it comes to the understanding and perception of public education: grow up!

Ohio Secretary of State and leading candidate for Governor, Ken Blackwell is pilfering the latest buzzword from other states, and transforming into a plan for Ohio Schools. The 65 Cent Solution represents little more than a shell game in that the solution supposedly moves money from one section of the local school budget to the other. We say “supposedly” because there appears to be a superfluity of unresolved issues in a plan that sounds so good to anyone looking for easy answers to a complex series of problems. Like a teenager full of gallant, naïve, and impractical dreams, Blackwell and those in the anti-public education alliance are pushing this to good to be true, shifty idea as a universal remedy for Ohio School districts. Using the 65-cent solution would be more like putting a stunning façade on a rapidly deteriorating building.

This so-called plan is making the rounds of those in the conservative network who have a penchant for throwing rotten tomatoes into the raging debate over the efficiency of public education. In Ohio, they claim that the 65-cent solution will bring 1.2 billion dollars into the classroom. Without regard for local control of schools, and while ignoring the widely noted achievements of the singular, remarkable, and highly performing suburban and rural school districts in Ohio, Blackwell states that only 57 cents of every dollar “makes it into the classroom.” This broad over-generalized statement is typical of the one-size fits all approach taken by too many politicians. By articulating this hollow idea as if it were fresh, appealing and functional, Blackwell’s shrill voice has the piercing quality of the out of tune piccolo player on a John Phillips Sousa march.

While we at Thespis Journal strongly advocate for dollars to be spent in closest proximity to the students, a more comprehensive study of the unanticipated and unintended consequences of the Blackwell plan should be deliberated and evaluated. In the mean time, this 65-cent solution elicits a myriad of unanswered questions and educational concerns.

  • Simplistically shifting resources does not insure a better education for each child.
  • Establishing the precise meaning of “money spent in the classroom” is the pivotal piece of any debate regarding resources. For example, does this include nurses, aides required by federal and state law, and counselors?
  • Administrators are endlessly creative in skirting and avoiding any new statute with great legal minds assisting them.
  • In some districts, the 65-cent solution is already in place, yet the district cannot reconcile the conflicting goals of the solution with all of the federal and state mandates relative to educating students with disabilities. Basic educational needs are often totally un-funded while the district copes with the soaring costs of special education mandates.
  • The broad brush of the 65-cent solution will not fix the myriad of problems that competent and highly functioning school personnel face each and every day.
  • The 65-cent Solution does nothing to address the rising costs of health care that are crippling some Ohio school districts.
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled the Ohio system of funding schools unconstitutional several times. The middle and late 1990’s saw a large increase in funds for public education in Ohio. Increased resources alone will not fix all of the problems faced by Ohio’s school districts.

The failure to candidly distinguish the performance of suburban and rural public schools from the ills of the Ohio “big-eight” urban districts is a virus that infuses every discussion with deceitfulness, perplexity, and a total lack of productivity.

The stance of the republican leadership in Ohio relative to public schools is mystifying to me as a teacher and as a conservative. Conservatives tend to be resilient, resourceful, and can-do individuals. Genuine and hard-working republicans and democrats know our public schools need reform, resources, and transparent, meaningful accountability. It is unlikely for a republican like Ken Blackwell to have to dupe the voters into thinking that he has a real plan for Ohio schools. However, that seems to be exactly what Mr. Blackwell is doing.

Isn’t it time that we move beyond slogans, demagoguery and searing rhetoric? Being the heart of it all, as Ohio constantly claims to be, should guarantee every child in Ohio a fabulous education that is provided by the state. Draining state tax dollars to pay for students to attend “Ecot” (Ohio’s disreputable computer school) is not a plan to provide the equitable and adequate education that the state constitution requires.

There is no greater priority in our society than educating future generations of Ohioans. There are districts and students all over the state facing an educational crisis. Essential programs and services have been severely reduced and often eliminated.

Sure, more money could be spent in the classrooms, but in order to accomplish this task, more money will have to be spent.

Read the plan as presented by Governor Blunt in Missouri
Check Out the Education Wonks on this topic
The Anchoress has another view of Ken Blackwell

Condi For President-Again!

Although we have still not had time to read the latest book by Dick Morris, Condi vs. Hillary, the saga of whether or not Condi Rice will run for President in 2008 continues in the media weekly. As previously stated on Thespis Journal, we support the idea of Dr. Rice for President. She is a brilliant woman with immaculate credentials. Her life story is motivational, and her history with Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and President George W. Bush is compelling, and her insights unmatched.

First Lady Laura Bush entered the foray this past Friday by naming Dr. Rice as a possible candidate for President in the context of her interviewer pursuing a line of questioning about women candidates for the office.

The New York Daily News
reports the story in total which includes the following statement by writer, Kenneth R. Bazinet.
“Asked about other potential female candidates in a CNN interview, Mrs. Bush pointedly ignored the question in an apparent snub of Sen. Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.), who is salivating at the chance to return to the White House - this time in the lead role.”

There is more over at Town Hall News today. Dr. Rice has once again stated that running for political office is not her forte. We still believe that she would make an excellent candidate.

Secretary Rice is the most eloquent, expressive, and verbally agile spokesperson for President Bush. She has been on the frontline of the current administrative offensive to reframe the debate regarding the Iraq war, to assert the role of the National Security Agency involvement in the surveillance of known terrorists, and to articulate the need for the renewal of all provisions of the Patriot Act. Regardless of whether she is sitting down with Brit Hume or Tim Russert, Secretary Rice is cool, calm, collected, and makes the indisputable case for the administration on all of these critical national security issues.

As time passes it seems that Dick Morris is a prophet in his book. Hopefully, Secretary Rice will consider a run for the White House in 2008. Her mastery of the English language, her communication dexterity, her ability to tackle the hard-hitting media, her toughness (does anyone remember her verbal exchanges with Barbara Boxer during her confirmation hearings?), and her vast knowledge base make her President Bush’s number one asset. If Condi were a liberal, the liberal press would be touting her credentials as a superstar, and as a champion of the African American Community. Instead, it is left to bloggers and other alternative media sources to hail the political genius of Dr. Condoleeza Rice, and give her credit for her obvious knowledge of world and domestic affairs.

Previously:
Secretary Rice Knocks It Out of the Park-Again!
Condoleeza Rice: Diplomat and Politician Extraordinaire
Dick Morris Does It Again
They're At It Again

Sunday, January 15, 2006

Sad News on MLK Day

E.R. Shipp, a Pulitzer Prize winning African-American Columnist at The New York Daily News, reports distrubing news regarding the MLK Center and the family of MLK.
So how ironic and sad and downright infuriating that it has come to this: Some of the civil rights leader's family want to sell the Atlanta-based King Center to the feds, namely the National Park Service.His family is so dysfunctional that they cannot even agree on whether the King Center, where pilgrims flock to pay their respects at his crypt and to purchase souvenirs, should exist as an independent organization. They cannot even agree on whether King Center board member Andrew Young - former King aide, former congressman, etc., etc. - is a good guy or a bad guy. Young supports the sale.
The King family could be - along with the Michael Jackson family, of course - the most dysfunctional prominent black family in the United States.We have indulged the Kings for too many years. When MLK was killed in 1968 he was as young as or younger than his children are today and had accomplished so so so so so so so much. It is unfair to expect them - or the Kennedys or the Roosevelts or the Rockefellers - to match or top the achievements of the ancestors who make us even know their names. But we the people do have the right to say that enough is enough in trading on the name of that ancestor.


How terribly tragic for the King family. Read the entire article, it is as interesting as it is informative.

Read More:
Black News.com, The Conservative Voice
Jay at Stop The ACLU has the definitive post on this topic!

The Meaning of the Alito Hearings

Update: You can see the video of the Fox News Sunday panel at the all new Ms.Underestimated! The new site is fabulous!
Update II: Michelle Malkin also has more information.

Besides having nominated the eminently qualified Samuel Alito to be an Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, President Bush and the conservatives have scored a major political victory this past week while sitting on the sidelines. When Harriet Miers withdrew her name from the process, President Bush could not have imagined the opportunities that would await him. No one could forecast the President’s prospect of restoring his finely honed political instincts, or the surprising opening that the senate democrats would give him in the first political week of 2006.


Riding on the notorious “derail the nominee” train first engineered by Teddy Kennedy in his 1986 detonation of Robert Bork’s nomination to the Supreme Court, Senators Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, and Kennedy permitted the entire process to replicate a ride on the corkscrew. Taking the media and citizen observers on an expedition that will not soon be forgotten, these senators and their colleagues propagated several abiding political themes leaving a lasting residue. Like the song lyric made popular in the 1972 movie The Poseidon Adventure, following these hearings, “there’s got to be a morning after.” It is time to cast a ray of common sense, conservative light through the remnants of shadowy haze conjured up by these loquacious and rambling senate relics. In the morning mist following this miasma, the development of future political strategies is tenuous and theories of the lessons learned are fragile. This certainly won’t stop Biden or Kennedy from engaging in a post-mortem of the misdemeanor they committed.

By truncating the questioning process in favor of strident and tortuous political statements, by forcing the issue of Altio’s membership the Concerned Alumni of Princeton, and by infusing the hearing process with smears and erroneousness, the democrats on the judiciary committee rendered the process of historically significant and constitutionally sound hearings derisory and indecorous.

Most notably, Senator Biden has been cited by no less of a source than The New York Times has having spent the largest segment of his time talking rather than asking the nominee questions that could elicit informative responses. In over 700 redundant, bullying questions laced with invective, misinformation, and harsh pejoratives, democrats hassled the nominee, but failed to do anything except reveal Altio’s superior intellect and his imperturbable, professional demeanor. Alito listened calmly as each of the democrat senators overplayed their liberal hand by berating a man exuding common decency. And now, Uncle Teddy is claiming that the entire process is too political.

In a juvinile display worthy of a high school student council dispute, Senator Kenndy tried to make ominous claims that documents requested were not produced. Uncle Teddy had quite a little scrape with Chairman, Arlen Specter.

Senator Kennedy’s political stunt, which was trumped within hours of its ignition, represented nothing more than a bogus attempt to garner media attention, and did nothing to further the integrity and dignity of the process. The mainstream media has typically led the public astray with its’ commentary and contemptuous description of the Concerned Alumni of Princeton. Liberal democrats described CAP as intolerant, against women, minorities, and civil rights, and completely mischaracterized the organization. Continually called “tawdry” by Senator Schumer, CAP has been described by Terry Eastland of The Weekly Standard as “a group of conservative alumni concerned about trends at their alma mater: a faculty tilting left, a curriculum going politically correct, academic standards declining.”

The media accepted the democrats characterization of CAP to stand uncontested. In fact, ABC News adopted as truth the dishonest, liberal Democratic allegations about the supposedly bigoted agenda of CAP. World News Tonight anchor Elizabeth Vargas referred to Alito's “membership in a controversial group opposed to women and minorities at his college.” Yet, CAP has had as editors of its publication Laura Ingraham, a woman, and Dinesh D'Souza, a scholar at the Hoover Institution and a native of India. Still today, Chuck Schumer stated on Fox News Sunday that if the “shoe were on the other foot, and a democrat President nominated someone who was a part of radical organization of the left in college of after, the Republicans would have questions too.” Really, Mr. Schumer? You are right, they might have questions, but they will also vote for the nominee as in the case of Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who as an adult worked for the most radical left-wing group: the ACLU.

Andrew Napolitano, former New Jersey Superior Court Judge, classmate and friend of Sam Alito, and member of CAP has defended the organization from left wing attack artists. CAP, Napolitano said, was committed instead to increasing alumni involvement in Princeton and tempering "the University's anti-traditionalist leftist urges" at a sensitive time in history when the majority of students and faculty were opposed to the Nixon administration's policies, particularly the Vietnam War. Napolitano said he never associated himself with any individual's anti-coeducation stance, adding that "Sam Alito would never associate himself with that" either.

Regardless of the truth, Kennedy, Feinstein, Schumer and others painted CAP with the broad brush of “intolerance” and the lap dog media picked it up without even altering the verbiage.


When it was revealed that Alito had no documented or anecdotal association with CAP, Teddy Kennedy was, believe it or not, speechless, and the CAP issue disappeared as quickly as Kennedy had uttered a bombshell by invoking the Watergate sounding word, “subpoena.”

Even Katie Couric seems to realize that the democrats on the sensate judiciary committee went several steps too far in their pursuit of Supreme Court Justices who will protect the staggeringly flawed 1973 decision in Roe vs. Wade. When she was questioning Senator Joe Biden on the Today Show this past Thursday, the omnipresent prejudicial banner that has become the fixture of our slanted news coverage stated, “Democrats Gone Too Far.” Uncharacteristically, Katie hammered Biden with questions, and inadvertently advanced the future story of the Alito hearings.

Apparently, Biden told Katie Couric that perhaps these judiciary hearings have outlived their usefulness. Biden suggested that the debate over a nominee should be moved to the senate floor. How convenient. Apparently realizing that the failure of he and his colleagues to make points in a process designed to provide information and ascertain the qualifications of a nominee, Biden wants to move the one sided conversation to the senate floor.

As the powder settles from the myriad of political stunts and the intellectually and morally bankrupt performance of the liberal democrats, let us hope that the process is changed forever, but not ended. Fred Barnes of The Weekly Standard says that Joe Biden has it right. We strongly disagree. The constitutional role of the senate to advise and consent on judicial nominees has been historically fulfilled through the senate judiciary committee, a vote there, and a debate and vote on the senate floor. Surely, the legacy of the Roberts and Alito hearings will be the restoration of the decorum and dignity of the process.

Although the last twenty years have been detrimental to the process of vetting on potential judicial nominations, our nation’s long history of setting partisanship aside and dealing with qualifications and judicial philosophy will surely return in the near future. By playing the “Bork Card” one time too many, the response, reaction and treatment of further nominees could be forever changed for the better. We can certainly hope for the best.

Ronald Reagan taught us that hope is the trademark of the conservative movement. Let’s hope for the best, and at any rate, what do the Republicans have to lose by sticking the process? As long as the republicans are the majority, they can vote out most every nominee from the committee. If the republicans are ever the minority again, they will want the hearings process to bring the truth to light.

Previously: Thoughts on the Alito Hearings

Alito is not Scalia
More coverage at The Political Teen
Linked to Perish The Thought, Read All The Links at Right Wing Nation,
Check out Real Teen-Right on the Right
Check out TMH's Bacon Bits-it's wonderful!
Read Basil's Blog
The Mudville Gazette has great links

Saturday, January 14, 2006

Murtha Continues Anti-War Tour

One can safely say that Congressman John Murtha hasn’t had this much media coverage in his entire political career. From the beginning of this contrived media stunt, we have suspected that Murtha was nothing more than a political charlatan serving at the whims of leftist Nancy Pelosi. This contemptible attempt to manipulate the mainstream media and influence the mind of the common sense voter appears to be uncharted water for a novice like Murtha. When his initial failure to capture the minds of voters failed as the Republicans in the House called his bluff by voting down the “Murtha resolution,” Murtha became the darling of the media and embarked upon his moonbat tour of far-out media events.

We were wondering all week what antics Murtha might have planned next. Our friend, George Skinner at Stuck on Stupid gives us a clear idea by reporting on Murtha’s appearance with the women from the whacko group “Code Pink.” Read the entire post, it is well worth it, and it demonstrates one of Murtha’s recent adventures with the far left wing.

Next, Ian Schwartz gives us video and a preview of Murtha’s upcoming appearance on the CBS program 60 Minutes. Murtha is still trying to find a message that will resonate with someone beyond the inside the beltway types of the liberal media. His unsubstantiated and outlandish claims continue to give aid and comfort to the enemy and border on treason, as average voters understand it. Murtha continues to insist that our troops will be brought home this year regardless of the consequences. Murtha just can't drop his dream to "cut and run" as soon as possible. He seems to enjoy giving comfort and aid to the enemy.

As previously stated on Thespis Journal, we hope that Murtha remains front and center throughout this election year. He is the perfect remedy for the perfect storm-the culture of corruption. Murtha’s gibberish will likely last in the public memory well past the corruption scandals of December/January. I would like to close with this statement by Bill Kristol of The Weekly Standard.

“In 1946, George Orwell remarked that "the quickest way of ending a war is to lose it, and if one finds the prospect of a long war intolerable, it is natural to disbelieve in the possibility of victory."Victory is in fact possible, though it will require a longer war than anyone would like, but not so long a war as to be intolerable. What would be intolerable would be to lose to the terrorists in Iraq. Immediate withdrawal from Iraq is a prescription for catastrophe. Far from extricating ourselves from a crisis, we would have driven ourselves into an even deeper crisis. It is no favor to the members of the armed forces who have served or are serving in Iraq to declare now that all their efforts and sacrifices are in vain. The way to honor their sacrifices is by winning.”

Read Ten Stupid Things Said By Liberals in Just Three Days.
Oliver North takes Murtha to task for his recent displays of bad judgment.
Be Sure to read everything at Right Wing Nation
Linked to Basil's Blog

Update: News Busters Breaks Story of Murtha's Lobbyist Contributions! They exceed Tom Delay!

Update II: Brent Baker has much more detail about Murtha's 60 minutes bloviating.

More at The Mudville Gazette-In the "Vast Support The Troops" Conspiracy?
The Mudville Gazette got all of this started!

Friday, January 13, 2006

CNN Appears To Endorse Shadegg for Leader

Is it possible that the editors at Red State and the liberal news machine at "The Situation Room" with Wolf Blitzer could be of one mind in the campaign for a new majority leader in the US House of Representatives? A common bond between the editors of Red State and the folks at CNN certainly makes for intriguing political theater, and this is exactly what happened on Thursday and Friday, as both organizations seemed to take sides in favor of Representative John Shadegg of Arizona.

Ed Henry of CNN played a package piece, and then engaged in a brief conversation with Wolf Blitzer. Whenever possible, we watch The Situation Room to see what the other side is saying. Imagine my shock when Ed Henry reported the story with a degree of accuracy rarely seen on CNN. Henry stated that the nature of the leadership election is rpaidly becoming about electing a leader who is removed from the hint of any scandal. He correctly stated that Blunt is ahead in the race, but that anything might happen bewteen now and February 2.

In addition, the pressure from conservative bloggers has been ratcheted up today with a strong statement from prominent bloggers posted at The Truth Laid Bear and at Red State.

After careful consideration (John Boehner is from an adjacent congressional district), we at Thespis Journal have issued the following endorsement for a leader who is free of any scandals that will make the headlines on the day of the election.


"Fresh Leadership that has the full weight of the Republican faithful in tandam with a desire to pursue the fundamental values of the conservative party will lead to great legislative and electoral victories in 2006!

Hopefully, the House of Representatives will pursue comprehensive income tax reform, immigration reform, and fully support the war on terror.

We at Thespis Journal are proud to join this distinguished list of bloggers advocating for a meaningful change in leadership in the February elections. Please include our signature on the petition.

Thespis Journal

Check out the links at Stop The ACLU
Here is more at Outside The Beltway


Thespis Journal Inaugurates "Posts of The Week"

As I read my way around the blogosphere/internet this week, I was impressed with the ever increasing quality of written work that is produced on the internet and in the blogs. I watched and listened with great curiousity as Ian Schwartz, and others reported the RNC Blog Row, 2006 held on Capital Hill this week. There also appears to be a superbly healthy desire to recognize unique and insightful work among the conservative bloggers. By using techniques like open tracking, and the profuse use of cross posting, bloggers stay connected and find out places on the internet that become "My Daily Reads."

It is our deire at Thespis Journal to contribue to the publication of the great writing of other bloggers, and to promote the hospitable atmosphere which we found among the conservative blogosphere when we entered this unknown realm on September 5, 2005. With this in mind, we published our own "Thespis Journal Awards Blogs Of The Year " on December 30.

Therefore, we are today initiating Thespis Journal Presents Outstanding Posts This Week Hopefully, this will become something wonderful with bloggers submitting posts to for us to consider. Maybe there is a better title. It could be the "Weekly Carnival of Best Posts." The carnival thing seems to be very popular. Please let me know your thoughts.

At any rate let us move forward with great posts from great bloggers-all published within the last week. Congratulations to these wonderful bloggers! Their work is a tribute to the true intent of the First Ammendment, and the uniquely rugged, unbridled, revolutionary American Spirit. Blog On, dear friends! Highlight all those topics not covered in the mainstream media, and continue to expose liberal hypocrisy in all corners of the USA.

Betsy Newmark has an excellent post
about the democrat’s planned delay of the vote on the nomination of Samuel Alito in the committee and on the senate floor. The democrats have a crafty strategy for gaining every small political inch out of this one.

Ian Schwartz has a wonderful post on Ed Meese’s appearance with Chris Matthews on Hardball. This is a great post with video.

The fabulous Ms. Underestimated has two arresting posts regarding the nine year old Georgia girl who got into trouble for painting the American Flag on the road in front of her house. This complete coverage is followed with an update and commentary.

It doesn’t get much better than this in the blogosphere.

TMH’s Bacon Bits has two wonderful posts this week.

The first questions whether the constitution is “Settled Law,, or Living Document?” He says that the democrats want both! This is excellent analysis.

The second is one of the finest pieces that I have ever read
. In this selection, “Should Alito Run From Roe” the author explores the possibility that Alito and future nominees should consider stating their honest assessment of Roe vs. Wade. This is an astute piece, and well worth reading.

In this insightful post, one can feel the Dr. Sanity’s passion for the conservative cause, and her resolute support for President Bush. Give this woman a Pulitzer prize for she is the next Charles Krauthammer.

In her usual manner, Michelle Malkin trumps most of the media with her coverage of “The Woman Democrats Don’t Want to Hear.” This wonderful post exposes the total hypocrisy of the democrats on the judiciary committee. Kennedy, Schumer, Biden, Durbin and Feinstein spent the week preening for the cameras and their left wing, kook supporters.

The weekly “Carnival of Education” at Jenny D has many interesting posts. There are two posts from Thespis Journal included in the carnival this week.

For all of you educators out there, The Education Wonks have a great article about merit pay coming to the Houston Public Schools. The wonks candidly state the case against merit pay in their summary of the news.

In a two-part post this week, Bryan Preston demonstrated again why he is one of the best in this business. First, Bryan explores the possibility that the treasonous leaks to the New York Times regarding the NSA caused a surge in deposable cell phone sales. In the second part of the post, Bryan explores the attempt by the Maryland legislature to mandate that Wal-Mart provide health care benefits to all of its’ employees. This is a must read.

There is so much to read at Captain’s Quarters this week, that making a single selection is difficult. In this post, Captain Ed dissects a flawed editorial in The Washington Post relative to the Alito hearings. While you are visiting Captain Ed, read all the other extraordinary coverage of Blog Row and the Alito hearings.

The Anchoress has an infinitely valuable piece called, “NY Times Tipped Terrorists? Updated.” You certainly won’t hear this much detail from a mainstream media that takes its’ news cues from the gray lady. The Anchoress is unblemished as always.

You can read about Basil’s memory and reminisces of the “goat-man.”

The Nose On Your Face is full of biting sarcasm in their piece entitled: “Alito Out Sick, Questioning to Continue in his Absence.”

And Another Thing….Mark Levin sums up Uncle Teddy Kennedy’s abhorrent behavior of the last forty years in the Senate at his new blog.

Please leave feedback, and feel free to submit your work. Congratulations to all!

Check out all the links at Stuck on Stupid.


There are some wonderful links at Right Wing Nation

Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Thoughts on the Alito Hearings...

In a conversation with a friend last night, we were lamenting the fact that it is not possible for Judge Alito to simply state that as a supreme court justice, “I will overturn the egregious decision of Roe vs. Wade and allow the issue to return the political process, and the voters of each state can make the autonomous decision.” For just one minute, isn’t it great to think about Alito saying to Uncle Teddy Kennedy, “Damn right, dumb ass, I think Roe was wrongly decided!” The resulting cheer from around the nation would rival a Wagnerian soprano holding forth at full tilt.

The nomination hearings for Judge Samuel Alito to be a justice on The United States Supreme Court have revealed more about the condition of the democrat party and the philosophy of their liberal senators than it will ever expose about Sam Alito. While the democrats were hoping that President Bush’s nominees would provide a political opening of unmatched proportions, the hearings and publicity have served the administration and the mission and view of the conservative movement as the most effective policy and political initiative of the Bush second term.

Alito has been brilliant. He is reserved without being contrite. He is fabulously articulate, and has regularly schooled Durbin, Kennedy and Schumer on the finer points of conservative, common sense jurisprudence. Rush Limbaugh has excellent analysis of Alito roasting Schumer. We at Thespis Journal have previously given detailed coverage in the famed article, “Alito is No Scalia.” Our prediction of December 15, 2005 has certainly come true. Here is an excerpt from that article.
Only time will tell what comes of this scorching issue. Will Alito get the job? Regardless of the strategy employed by the left, Judge Alito is still very likely to be confirmed. The Republican majority in the senate is counting on at least fifty of their fifty-five votes. The liberals in the senate are likely to increase the volume and intensity of their speechifying in the weeks ahead. Having failed in their harsh criticism of President Bush on the Iraq war, these shrill opponents of Judge Alito’s nomination will stop at nothing to smear Judge Alito and deny him the opportunity to serve as a member of the Untied States Supreme Court as a singular justice.

It is a shame that the democrat party has allowed itself to become the “abortion on demand protection party.” As Uncle Teddy Kennedy, Dick Turban, Chuckles Schumer and others have rambled on through their thinly disguised dogma, it has become embarrassingly obvious that the abortion issue, a right that they baselessly claim is spelled out in the constitution, is their only issue.

The first three days of hearings have been covered extensively by the bloggers. The concept of stare decisis has been featured again. This is the judicial notion that all previous decisions of the court must be granted extraordinary respect and an almost super-precedent status. The liberals want an iron-clad promise from Judge Alito that he will protect the concept of stare decisis as a consecrated irrevocability, and therefore protect all of the implications and results of Roe vs. Wade.

It is interesting to note that Ruth Bader Ginsburg, the most liberal of all of the current justices, has expressed difficulty with the affected reasoning of Roe. Further discussion of the role of Roe in this hearing, the Ginsburg hearing, and the pragmatic position to be followed by any principled conservative, everyone should read an extremely well done post at TMH’s Bacon Bits. This post, regarding the conservative position on Roe, is one of the finest blog posts that I have ever read.

For the purpose of protecting this “constitutional right” Uncle Teddy Kennedy had an outburst today while demanding a subpoena of previously unmentioned records. Senator Arlen Specter, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee had a heated exchange with Senator Kennedy regarding his failure to observe protocol in making this demand. Even liberal “journalist" Chris Matthews referred to Uncle Teddy’s eruption today as a “high school” games. Is this the same Teddy Kennedy that Paul Begala called “smarter than the average bear” in December as the democrats planned their strategy for the hearings?
While the liberals and the mainstream media dwell upon the necessity of upholding the considerably blemished and poorly reasoned decision of Roe versus Wade, there are other great issues of significance before the court today, and there will doubtless be immense issues to be decided by the court in the future. Even Paul Begala the notorious prince of the strident liberals, said it is not advisable for the democrats in the senate to “act as if the Supreme Court is the abortion court.” The normally frantic Begala insisted that Alito has withheld critical information from the committee, while saying that Senator Kennedy is “smarter than the average bear” and that Senator Kennedy and others will succeed in discrediting Sam Alito by using a range of issues to frame his lack of suitability for the court.

WOW! Paul Begala was really off the mark! Read all about the Situation Room discussion on Friday, December 2.

In the heartland, where common sense America lives and works, these hearings show the worst of arrogant, entrenched politicians whose diet appears to be a steady dose of self-indulgent long-windedness.

Certainly, Judge Alito is well on his way to being confirmed. Kennedy, Durbin, and Schumer have simply demonstrated that their partisanship and far-left creed is more important to them than personal or professional ethics and integrity. These “gang of three” ultra liberals will never vote for any Bush nominee to the Supreme Court. As Americans, we have a right to expect more from our leaders, but as realists, we know not to.

For very detailed and highly credible coverage of the Alito hearings check out Ian’s work at the political teen. He has been there all week. Rush has excellent coverage of today’s stunt by Uncle Teddy.

Check out this post at Stop The ACLU
Check Out Stuck on Stupid
Shame, Shame on the dems, by Michelle Malkin
Alito Winning Early Rounds at Outside The Beltway-this is a fabulous piece!
Check out the Beltway Traffic Jam

An Operetic Giant Passes



UPDATE: There is another fabulous article in the New York Times today: Saturday, January 14, 2006.










Swedish Dramatic Soprano Birgit Nilsson is dead at the age of 87. The news is carried in The New York Times, Playbillarts.com, and other sources.

Nilsson’s singing came to define the fach of the dramatic soprano. In roles from Puccini’s Turandot, to Beethoven’s Fidelio, Wagner’s Isolde and Brunnhilde, and Verdi’s Leonora and Lady MacBeth, Nilsson was one of the giants of the twentieth century. All of the details are in the linked articles.

Hearing Birgit Nilsson sing Puccini’s Turandot on a recording with Franco Corelli as her Calaf is one of the great singing memories of my lifetime. Even thinking of her powerful, dramatic voice send chills down my spine. Dr. George Gibson, retired Professor of Voice and Opera at the Wichita State University, often told the story of hearing Birgit sing Turnadot in San Francisco with a very large chorus. He vividly recalled Miss Nilsson stepping down to the footlights and obliterating the entire chorus with her rapturous High C near the conclusion of “In Questa Reggia.”

I am also privileged to have three video/dvd recordings of Miss Nilsson’s singing, each one being a gem that gives one some idea of the size of her instrument and the consummate artistry which is the hallmark of her career. One is the video from the Met centennial gala in the 1983 with Nilsson singing one of her signature arias: Dich, Teure Halle by Richard Wagner. One is an appearance on The Bell Telephone Hour from the 1960’s in which Nilsson essays’ the great Verdi aria: Pace, Pace Mio Dio. Finally there is a recording of Birgit singing Vissi Darte from the Puccini opera Tosca. Each of these performances is thrilling, and represents opera history at its greatest.

Listen to a great recording of Birgit Nilsson singing, and raise a toast to one of the great voices of our time. May God Bless Birgit Nilsson, and the honor of her memory.


Opera News has more coverage.

Recall Kathleen Blanco

Following up on our many posts blasting the obvious incompetance of Governor Kathleen Blanco, it was a command performance for us to post about the recall effort just underway in Louisiana. Governor Blanco certainly qualified as a finalist for idiot of the year in 2005. Now, the voters of the great state of Louisiana will have the chance to get rid of Governor Blanco.
This is certain to be an uphill battle, but we can always hope. The process is somewhat different, but the mainstream media told us that Gray Davis could not be recalled in California, and look what happened there!!
In Louisiana, voters must sign the petitions in the exact mannner that they are registered to vote, otherwise the signature is thrown out. Also, according to the Advocate, it will take more than 900,000 signatures to get the issue on the ballot.
Check out more coverage:

Tuesday, January 10, 2006

Biased Reporting at the Wall Street Journal

Have you had time to forget the firestorm of criticism directed at The National Education Association prompted by The Wall Street Journal last week? Can you imagine the mainstream media getting a story so wrong that they have to retract their original reports? Well, the NEA was the subject of several harsh pieces in the blogosphere, and on the Fox News Channel last week. In fact, the NEA is so despised by the conservative media that many of these “journalists” forgot to do their fact-checking. Instead, they invoked the harsh rhetoric and classic invective that implies the disdain and disregard that these people have for the NEA.

By parroting the mischaracterizations in The Wall Street Journal piece, and by failing to conduct independent research on the matter, several journalistic outlets missed a big part of the story.

Although critics have accused me of it, I am no apologist for the NEA. The liberal agenda of the NEA and their support of causes which are marginally related to our teaching jobs is a source of great frustration to me as an Association member. However, the conservative movement should not permit itself to be driven by misrepresentations, or tolerate our debates to be characterized by shallow arguments and intellectual bankruptcy.

The $65 million in grants utilized in the editorial to falsely inflate the amount of money given by the NEA to outside advocacy groups is wholly inaccurate and misleading. Of the $65 million in grants, $64.2 million, fully 98% of the money, was returned to local and state affiliates in the form of grants for state and local education and advocacy. If one looks at the online filing in total, it is simple to see that NEA dollars are spent on NEA members and causes which include programs and initiates designed to study and improve student achievement, teacher quality, and working conditions for educational professionals.

Salary figures reported for the National officers of the NEA include travel budgets, housing for two residences, and other costs associated with serving as an association officer. It is disingenuous to report these dollars as income.

The NEA filed a 1,400-page report detailing all of their financial dealings. No one has alleged anything illegal, and active members of the NEA can voice their concerns through numerous channels.

While the other $800,000 in expenditures to outside groups could represent a rebate of less than forty cents per member, this was the leading fact trumpeted by The Wall Street Journal, and all those ensconced in the anti-NEA echo chamber. Conservatives must strive to avoid the obvious liberal trap of using the New York Times to signal the “story of the day.” The conservative press is more likely to check the facts first, and place the story the proper context. The obvious failure of The wall Street Journal cost us conservatives valuable debating points.

Great Friends with posts on this matter. Check out all of these great blogs!

Ms. Cornelius
Pat Cleary at Red State
Mike Antonucci has the definitive article on this matter.
Bryan Preston at Junk Yard Blog
LaShawn Barber
Spunky Home School
The Education Wonks

Previous related articles:

An Open Letter To Michelle Malkin

More on the Open Letter
Update on the Open Letter
Wall Street Journal Cues Up The Latest Bashing of Public Education

Check out this article at ReformK12.com
Basil's Blog

Monday, January 09, 2006

All Hail: Phantom of the Opera



CONGRATULATIONS to
PHANTOM OF THE OPERA, the longest running show in Broadway history!


Here are some links to the news of tonight's gala showing..........

Phantom for the record: all the Phantom Facts you always wanted to know...

Night UnFurls Its' Splendor....will Grizzabella make an apperance on the stage of the "Paris Opera"?

Here's The Playbill from Opening Night in 1988

Special Coverage from Broadway.com

Here is what one of the patrons said tonight after arriving home after the show (Courtesy of the Broadway World message board)

Just got home from the show. I left a piece of confetti in my hair for good measure (if there is any confetti left in New York, I'd be surprised--I think most of it is on the floor of the Majestic).

The show tonight was incredible. The audience clapped itself silly when the lights went down, clapped itself into a frenzy when the chandelier went up, then stopped the show several more times during the first ten minutes (most applause went to George Lee Andrews' entrance as Andre). The cast responded to the energy of the room, and the entire first act flew by. Howard McGillin was an amazing phantom, and while Sandra Joseph isn't the most powerfully-voiced Christine I've seen, her emotional honesty in the part was touching and gorgeous to watch. Also, much love to Anne Runolfsson as Carlotta (powerhouse!) and Marilyn Caskey (the ex-Carlotta and current Madame Giry). I've seen the show many times before, but tonight the cast found all of the humor (Notes was exceptional), all of the sadness (All I Ask of You Reprise), and all of the quirks that define this show. It was amazing to watch.

I started getting teary in the second act, and nearly lost it during Wishing You Were Somehow Here Again. Sandra Joseph nailed that song. Before I knew it Meg was grabbing the mask, and then the audience was on its feet.

Curtain call was all smiles, then the cast began to leave the stage. The house darkened again, and the ballet girls formed a circle. They parted to reveal Victoria from Cats, who then did a dance over to the Phantom downstage. They danced a bit, then she strutted off stage with the whole Phantom company extending their arms toward her (does anyone know who was dressed/dancing as Victoria?). It was a classy, funny, touching tribute to the show.

Then came the tears, as past Christines, Raouls, Phantoms, and other principles took the stage for a reprise of Masquerade. Hearing all of their voices together (even over the tears of many of them) was a perfect end to the evening.

Of course the speeches came next, with Andrew Lloyd Webber, Hal Prince, Cameron Mackintosh, Gillian Lynne, and (lastly) Michael Crawford speaking. They all spoke of collaborators, people who could not be there, and the joy the show has brought them. Then, with a command from Michael Crawford, all the silver and gold confetti in the world rained down on us, followed by a shower of Phantom balloons.

Now the lucky folks are off at a masked ball, and I'm home to look at my souvenir mask and program. I hope everyone who got to be there enjoyed it, and I hope those of you who were not there get to see some of the coverage. It was a magical evening.

Updates from the Tuesday Press:


George Will Speaks on Teacher Education

George Will has an article posted on the MSNBC web site via Newsweek in which he challenges our nation to close all schools of education that train our teachers. As a twenty-year teacher, and supervisor of over twenty-five student teachers, (there are a lot of stories in there) there are many reasons why schools of education might need to be closed. Mr. Will’s reasons are far from the most compelling case to be made for closing all schools of education.

Sure, students pursuing a degree in teaching should not have a mandatory showing of "Fahrenheit 911." There may be too many ideologues of all stripes training our teachers. And, it would be great to have people with primary and advanced degrees in mathematics and biology teaching math and science in all of our schools. Maybe Mr. Will could propose the funding sources to pay these recruits and provide the money to retain all these brainiacs in the field of teaching.

Certainly, George Will possesses one of the keenest intellects in our society, and is one the finest columnists in America today. As usual, he has intriguing insights, however, he misses the forest for the trees this time.

Schools of education are missing more than political neutrality. Realistic and rigorous training for all future teachers is not often paired with high academic standards for students pursuing a degree in education. A degree program that matches strong academics with meticulous pre-professional preparation is a rare commodity. In addition, it is no secret that the poor pay and abhorrent working conditions in our schools today are discouraging factors for bright and engaging young people searching for a fulfilling career.

As a proud graduate of Anderson University in Indiana, I can safely state that no one ever asked my political philosophy. I have coached student teachers from Cedarville University, The University of Dayton, Wright State University, Wilberforce University, and Central State University. Political views have NEVER entered into any of those discussions. The focus has always been on teaching methodology, professional behavior and ethics, and knowledge and skills related to the subject matter being taught. There are many of these young people who should have been counseled out of teaching before they ever met me during their final semester in their culminating project. Many of these student teachers needed more experience in teaching methods, a good deal more common sense, and stronger skills in the subject matter.

While some of the larger state institutions may be replete with political indoctrination, most schools of education do not go astray in this area. These schools simply need a dual focus on the mastery of the field of study, and on a practical course of study in teaching methodology for all of their potential graduates.

Mr. Will is certainly above delivering this boilerplate epistle full of standard claims of liberal bias at state schools. This column of Mr. Will's makes him appear to be the victim of the conservative ruse of utilizing isolated incidents to paint an entire canvas. These clichés of contemplation serve only to undermine the credibility of the conservative movement, and reduce educational issues to trite remnants that merit no further debate.


Ed Wonk has noteworthy commentary.

RNC Blog Row 2006

Scroll for updates and more links...

Several prominent conservative bloggers are in Washington DC today where the Republican National Committee is holding the 2006 RNC Blog Row. Ian Schwartz is there profusely blogging away. There is great detail on the plans for the mid-term elections this coming November. LaShawn Barber was supposed to be there too, but she indicates that she went home to think on everything that happened in Philadelphia at Justice Sunday III. Check out her wonderful coverage from Philadelphia.
It would be amazing to sit with Michelle Malkin, Captain Ed Morissey, and other to-notch bloggers who bring such fabulous skill and expertise to this job. Thanks to these people, truth is often exposed, and other common sense views are given a voice.
Maybe someday, I will be invited to some event like this one.
Also, thanks Ian for all of the updates!

Saturday, January 07, 2006

A Tribute To PHANTOM OF THE OPERA: The Longest Running Musical in Broadway History


Where were you in January 1988?

It seems like only yesterday that the Broadway community was celebrating the final show of CATS, the spectacular Andrew Lloyd Weber creation from 1982 that became the longest running musical in Broadway history. Actually, that final performance was in September 2000.

However, in a special gala performance on Monday, January 9, 2005, Lloyd Weber’s PHANTOM OF THE OPERA will become the eighth show since Oklahoma reached the milestone 2, 212 performances in 1948 to achieve the “longest running” status while playing Broadway. This astonishing milestone-the 7,486th performance- is a rarified moment of splendid joy for the entire Broadway community.

PHANTOM OF THE OPERA has been an unparalleled success on Broadway. Ticket sales for this show have had almost no week spots in eighteen years. When other shows shuttered in the wake of September 11, 2001, Phantom of the Opera continued strong. The sensation caused in January, 1988 still reverberates today, and tourists from all over the world make the pilgrimage to the Majestic Theater on 44th Street and Eighth Avenue to see this most beloved of all musicals.

The following shows were celebrated as the longest running show for a period of time in the years since 1948.
CATS: 7,485
A CHORUS LINE: 6,137

42ND STREET: 3,486

GREASE: 3,388

FIDDLER ON THE ROOF 3,242

HELLO DOLLY!: 2,844
MY FAIR LADY 2,717

OKLAHOMA!: 2,212

Monday evening will be a transcending moment in Broadway history, as no current show could possibly pass Phantom of the Opera in the next few years. And, Phantom of the Opera shows no signs of slowing down on Broadway with record ticket sales in the past year.


Eighty million people have seen a production of Phantom of the Opera somewhere in the world since it opened in London in 1986. The show opened in New York on January 26, 1988. The idea for what would become the most successful musical of all time came to Lloyd Webber one afternoon in the early 1980s while he was browsing through a bookstall on Fifth Avenue on Manhattan Island. That's where he found a copy of Gaston Leroux's 19th-century novel about a disfigured composer living beneath the Paris Opera House who falls in love with a beautiful young soprano. "It was a very confusing novel," Lloyd Webber says. "But I was struck by the last line, which said that when they exhumed the Phantom's body they found Christine's ring on his finger." Lloyd Webber saw "The Phantom" not as a horror story (like the famous Lon Cheney movie) but as a lush romance.


The very first song he wrote was "All I Ask of You," which set the romantic tone for the show.
"The Phantom" is probably the most valuable piece of Lloyd Webber's vast theatrical empire, The Really Useful Group, a privately held company that controls the rights to his shows with "Cats," "Jesus Christ Superstar" and "Evita" being among the most successful. And while statistics that are trotted out extolling the longevity and profitability of the production, it's the people, both on-stage and behind the scenes, which make the musical work at each performance.

Some employees have been there from the very beginning: Jan. 26, 1988, when "Phantom,'' the tale of a deformed composer haunting the Paris Opera House and his love for the beautiful soprano Christine, first opened at the Majestic Theatre. Among those on Broadway who have found steady employment for nearly two decades are musician Lowell Jay Hershey, who plays the trumpet in the show's orchestra; Thelma Pollard, the musical's makeup supervisor; and George Lee Andrews, one of three actors who have been in the production ever since the curtain first went up in New York. Why have they stayed so long in "Phantom''? It's good, steady work, they say.

In 1988, the New York production cost a then-record $8 million. Today, the figure would be $12 million.

"Phantom'' won eight Tony Awards, including the best-musical prize as well as the Tony for its original star, Michael Crawford. Ten actors have followed Crawford as the title character, including Howard McGillin, now in his second stint in the show. McGillin has put on that mask in more than 1,400 performances, more than any other Phantom on Broadway. He'll play the role Monday at a special 6:30 p.m. performance, which will be followed by a lavish masked ball at the Waldorf=Astoria hotel, presided over by producer Cameron Mackintosh.

It would be thrilling to be in the theater on Monday evening at 6:30pm as Broadway history is made. While Phantom of the Opera is not a personal favorite of mine, the lush, brilliant music, the gorgeous orchestrations, and the timeless story of the Paris Opera House will survive for generations. Without a doubt, Broadway’s Phantom is a ghostly spirit that will remain unsurpassed for the foreseeable future as the longest running attraction to ever hit the Broadway stage.

Read the original review by Frank Rick of the New York Times from Janaury, 1988

BackStage Magazine has a wonderful article on this special event.
A fabulous article and graphic illustration in The New York Times.
Great News: Broadway hits an all time high for ticket sales!
Playbill.com has an extensive interview with Andrew lloyd Weber on this marvleous achievement.

Fascinating Arts Headlines From NYC

There are several fabulous and intriguing arts related articles in the New York City Press this weekend. Enjoy all of the great reading.

This article in the New York Times by Anthony Tommassini highlights the return of legendary actor/singer Elaine Stritch to the Carlyle Hotel with her show "At Home at the Carlyle." The artcile also relates the fascinating story of Ms. Stritch's friendship with James Levine of the Metropolitan Opera.

There are some highly interesting replacement actors starting in Broadway shows this coming week. I would love to see Dame Eillen Atkins in the pulitzer prize winning play DOUBT.

Nathan Gunn, 35 year old baritone is a rising star at The Metropolitan Opera. Read the entire article, it is extremely well done.

According to The New York Daily News, "Dancing With The Stars" is once again a hit in the TV ratings.

Ken Mandelbaum explores the lengthy and unique history of the broadway musical "Once Upon A Mattress.

Erroneous Blogging at The Datyon Daily News

Scott Elliot, education reporter for The Dayton Daily News, blogs regularly on the daily news website under the title, "Get On The Bus." Recently, he blogged about a topic with all the expertise of a non-professional whose limited understanding and casual experience with music permitted him to speak on the standardized testing of music and the other arts. In fact, the headline of the article, "Flunked by the Beatles" reflects such commonly held misperceptions about the role of music in our schools and culture, that I pity the Dayton Daily News for having to put up with this amateurish employee.

In one of the last vestiges of time-honored prejudice, anyone who likes music and has opinions about music, is deemed “qualified” to comment upon the selection of music, the topics covered in the music curriculum, and now whether or not there are basic music concepts that could or should be tested. It is universally accepted that all performing arts teachers, and music instructors in particular, are the constant prey for these self-proclaimed critics.


As identified in the so-called "No Child Left Behind Legislation" music and the performing arts are core academic subjects that are worthy of the time and resources of the school district.

In his slipshod attempt at assisting music education, Mr. Elliot has hit upon a fundamental debate in the sphere of teaching music. Mr. Elliot believes that any testing would be detrimental to the experiences in music to be afforded to students who play an instrument in the band or orchestra, or those who sing in the choir. Nothing could be further from the truth. If students were to be tested on music fundamentals, beginning in elementary school, the school district would be forced to have all music courses taught by trained music specialists, and much like students have math class every day, music could be taught daily and experienced and learned more than once a week, as is the case today. Vibrant and dynamic music courses could be designed to teach all students the highly laudable goals of basic music literacy that have long since been identified in music courses of study.

A basic understanding of music education involves balancing the teaching of music fundamentals to all students, and the demands of performing ensembles for the elite few. Music Educators can no longer afford to be elitist in our approach. Music must be for all students, and as much disdain as we hold for the high stakes, “leave no child untested” environment in which we now function, a standardized test, measuring music fundamentals at all grade levels, would promote the greatest realization of comprehensive arts education in the last one hundred years.

There is significant and wide-ranging research that demonstrates the positive impact of sequential training in music upon math scores, and all academic achievement. The political and educational climate of today demands assessment and accountability at all levels. Voters and the politicians who represent the voters demand to know the results of their invested tax dollars. While there are many intrinsic values to the study of music and the other arts, some concrete proof of learning that is based upon content standards is the customary and useful practice of today. Failure to educate today’s young people in the basic goals of music literacy is to leave the child half-educated.

The trite example cited by Mr. Elliot to begin his article is so far removed from reality that it is laughable. No skilled and licensed music professional would even suggest that knowing the difference between Britney Spears and the Beatles is worthy of being discussed in music class much less posed as a question on a standardized test. In fact, despite one or two intelligent comments, the entire premise of the post is flawed. Music literacy, music theory and history, and performing ensembles are all part of inclusive course of study in music. The testing of basic skills and academic standards should include music, and should not be perceived by disinterested bystanders, novices, music-lovers, or music professionals as a threat or potential harm to music education. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, testing music would no doubt improve the quality of all K-12 music education programs.

Also: Check out the Carnival of Education at the Ed Wonk

Bush/Cheney Set The Economic Record Straight

Bill Sammon has a definative piece today regarding President Bush and Vice-President Cheney forcefully articulating the impact of tax cuts on the currently booming economy. As usual, Mr. Sammon cuts to the quick in his article.

The president also took the unusual step of resurrecting a quote from House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, who predicted in May 2003 that the president's tax cuts would be cause economic disaster.
"She said, 'Today the Congress of the United States will vote on a reckless, irresponsible tax plan that will undermine opportunity in our country,' " Mr. Bush recalled. "Since that congresswoman had uttered those words, the economy has added more than 4.5 million new jobs."

"In 2005, the American economy turned in a performance that is the envy of the industrialized world," Bush said.

U.S. payrolls expanded by 108,000 jobs during December, about half of expectations. But hiring in November was revised sharply upward, to 305,000 new jobs instead of the earlier reported 215,000. And the unemployment rate declined last month to 4.9 percent from 5.0 percent in November. "Just as this economy is getting going, there are some in Washington who want to take the money out of your pockets," Bush said.

An extensive search of the net does not reveal much coverage of this great economic news.
The Gateway Pundit has more complete coverage.
Irwin M. Stelzwer in The Weekly Standard: It's The Economy Stupid!

Gateway Pundit: General Pace Says Murtha Is Hurting Troop Morale

Gateway Pundit: General Pace Says Murtha Is Hurting Troop Morale

Murtha Is A Fool

Representative John Murtha is a fool! I hope that the democrats keep Representative John Murtha front and center for this entire election year. First, this veteran Marine, who has been championed by Nancy Pelosi, states that he would not enlist in the military as it exists today. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Of Staff, Peter Pace, is forced to admit the obvious: Murtha, as an official of the US Government is hurting the morale of our tropps. General Pace was diplomatic, but he was forced to say that Murtha is hurting the recruting efforts, and damaging the spirits of personnel currently in the fields. The Gateway Pundit has great coverage. The Mudville Gazette also gives great perspective to this story.

Secondly, Murtha was told off twice this week by a military veterans at a townhall meeting in Vermont. Sgt. Mark Seavey had the following comments for Congressman Murtha:
“Yes sir my name is Mark Seavey and I just want to thank you for coming up here. Until about a month ago I was Sgt Mark Seavey infantry squad leader, I returned from Afghanistan. My question to you, (applause) Like yourself I dropped out of college two years ago to volunteer to go to Afghanistan, and I went and I came back. If I didn’t have a herniated disk now I would volunteer to go to Iraq in a second with my troops, three of which have already volunteered to go to Iraq. I keep hearing you say how you talk to the troops and the troops are demoralized, and I really resent that characterization. (applause) The morale of the troops that I talk to is phenomenal, which is why my troops are volunteering to go back, despite the hardships they had to endure in Afghanistan.

And Congressman Moran, 200 of your constituents just returned from Afghanistan. We never got a letter from you; we never got a visit from you. You didn’t come to our homecoming. The only thing we got from any of our elected officials was one letter from the governor of this state thanking us for our service in Iraq, when we were in Afghanistan. That’s reprehensible. I don’t know who you two are talking to but the morale of the troops is very high.”


Thank you Sgt. Seavey for telling it like it is!


Rather than recover from, rephrase, or step away from his disasterous statements and publicity splash in
December, John Murtha appears to be nothing more than a "media hound" who keeps inching toward the Howard Dean, anti-War, kook leftist postion. The "cut and run," "imeediate redeployment" view of the world has been soundly defeated and roundly criticised. However, Murtha, Pelosi, and Dean have staked out this philosophical territory for the democrats in 2006. Without a doubt, the repulicans will be able to benefit from this irreponsible and wholly indefensible strategy.

Previous:
Murtha's Big Waves
Murtha's Shallow Idea
Why We Must Finish The Job in Iraq

Check out Michelle Malkin
Check out Ian's coverage at the Poltical Teen
Read Everything at Stuck On Stupid
Check out Ms. Underestimated
Ann Coulter: Why Democrats Can Not Be Trusted on National Security
Check out more updates at The Mudville Gazette

Terrorst Training Camps in Iraq

There is a major story being covered widely on the internet that you are not likely to see or hear about in the mainstream media. There should be a trumpet call, and bring out all of the mainstream media sources to the get cue for next week's big story. Right...! This will not happen. You have to read and search out the real news-even with 24/7 coverages on cable!

Stephen Hayes, the wonderful investigative journalist at The Weekly Standard, has an explosive piece posted on Friday regarding Saddam Hussein's terrorist training camps prior to the coalition invansion in 2003. This report by Mr. Hayes has been confirmed by eleven seperate sources-unlike many reports that we get from the mainstream media. Mr. Hayes is typically thorough and detailed in his reporting:

The photographs and documents on Iraqi training camps come from a collection of some 2 million "exploitable items" captured in postwar Iraq and Afghanistan. They include handwritten notes, typed documents, audiotapes, videotapes, compact discs, floppy discs, and computer hard drives. Taken together, this collection could give U.S. intelligence officials and policymakers an inside look at the activities of the former Iraqi regime in the months and years before the Iraq war
.The discovery of the information on jihadist training camps in Iraq would seem to have two major consequences: It exposes the flawed assumptions of the experts and U.S. intelligence officials who told us for years that a secularist like Saddam Hussein would never work with Islamic radicals, any more than such jihadists would work with an infidel like the Iraqi dictator. It also reminds us that valuable information remains buried in the mountain of documents recovered in Afghanistan and Iraq over the past four years.
In the face of such evidence, Carl Levin and other critics of the Iraq war trumpet deeply flawed four-year-old DIA analyses. Shouldn't the senator instead use his influence to push for the release of Iraqi documents that will help establish what, exactly, the Iraqi regime was doing in the years before the U.S. invasion?


Michelle Malkin has more.
This is the commentary at Powerline
Read Bill Kristol's wonderful piece at The Weekly Standard
You have to read this coverage at the Strata-Sphere
The Anchoress has addtional comments.

Cheney To Assist Dewine

When Thespis Journal described Ohio Senator Mike Dewine as RINO (Republican In Name Only) of the year, it caused some interest across the blogosphere. The latest comes from Robert Novak's column today in a section called, "Republican Loyalty."

The White House is dispatching Vice President Dick Cheney to raise money for embattled Republican Sen. Mike DeWine of Ohio, who has voted against President Bush on key legislative issues. Cheney will address a $1,000-a-ticket Capitol Hill Club reception on Jan. 26 that is intended to raise $100,000 for DeWine's campaign for a third term. DeWine most recently opposed Bush and Senate Republican leaders on the budget bill and on drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Invitations to the fund-raiser have been mailed to major Bush contributors.
With Republican control of the Senate at stake, DeWine faces potential difficulty for re-election. Democratic candidates include Rep. Sherrod Brown and Iraq War veteran Paul Hackett, who last year ran a close race in a heavily Republican congressional district
.

One need only refer to the RINO of the year column to know why Senator Dewine might be in trouble. A lot could happen in these months leading up to the November election. Stay Tuned...

Friday, January 06, 2006

More Futile NEA Bashing

The EdWonk has a post today attacking the National Education Association. As frustrated as I am with the liberal and often ill-advised positions of NEA, the random attacks based on selective evidence by the right wing blogosphere and various sources within the media are erroneous and border on reckless reporting and commentary. It takes no creativity, imagination, or investigative skills to randomly select and isolate a few expenditures by the NEA and use them disparage and slander the entire scope, purpose, function, and work of this professional association. This “gotcha” mentality is more often the ruse and technique of the tabloid liberal press and does nothing to protect and promote the efficacy of the conservative movement.

The most obvious and egregious diversion fired up by the anit-NEA alliance is the fact the national officers and executive committee members of the NEA are not elected by the rank and file national membership of the NEA. There are many forms of representative democracies in our great nation. Democratically elected representatives vote on all leadership positions throughout the state affiliates and the national organization. Any member can serve as an elected representative to district, state, and national conventions and vote on the numerous policies of the organization. EdWonk is also inaccurate in saying that the President appoints all paid positions. This is not the case in Ohio at all. Staff positions require significant training and experience, and there is an extensive process to qualify for one of these positions.

Would the anti-NEA coalition really advocate for more expensive, national campaigns that take more focus away from teaching and from students? Most elected leaders are volunteers, performing the colossal task of teaching full time in addition to their unpaid service. There is no clamor from within the organization to make the process more cumbersome and time consuming. Any respectable full-teacher is focused on the learning of their number one priority: their students. If a majority of the members demand this change, it will happen.

The attempt by the anti-NEA forces to portray the NEA as undemocratic is faulty and laughable. While the NEA, like any other organization, is in need of significant improvement, the attempt to convert random, incomplete, and injudicious information into a legitimate and prolific attack on the NEA is futile. Trying to create the impression that the NEA is a corrupt union undercuts the very motives of these dissonant voices. As an active teacher member, I have significant philosophical, political, and strategic differences with the NEA. The way to affect change is to get involved!

Here’s some advice for dissatisfied union members: get involved in your local organization. You will find many very active local professional organizations and teacher leaders who advocate almost entirely for a better learning environment for students, and for many of the common sense goals for education reform. You will find leaders with greater expertise and skill than many administrators, and since these teachers are closest to the students, you will find educational professionals with expertise beyond compare. Also, in Ohio, the local association has the opportunity at any time, to affiliate with any state or national union, or operate as any independent association. Isn’t it a basic principle of self-reliant conservatism to affect change with activism and not resort to cheap shots and idle complaints?


Look at a breakdown of your dues dollars. In Ohio, the bulk of our dues money remains in the state and funds the multifaceted services of the Ohio Education Association. The OEA provides a smorgasbord of services, conferences, professional and legal advice, and political advocacy on a host of issues which never make it into the mainstream media. What happens when a teacher is falsely accused? Does anyone actually believe that the inept administration would actually protect a strong teacher and defend their honor and integrity? The pressure of a strong union is one of the necessary checks and balances of to keep the administration honest and professional.

Because the media and all those who oppose the NEA has successfully painted the NEA with the broad brush of liberal activism, the many untold stories of advocacy for quality education and comprehensive educational reform never make it to your neighborhood blog spot.

In Ohio, it is most often the case that administrators lack the guts to non-renew a teacher’s contract, or turn down a request for tenure. The overwhelming and consummate power of the administration to hire and fire employees, set policy and procedure, assign employees, and determine the contract status for individual teachers places the burden of accountability and responsibility squarely and solely upon the administration and the school board members of the individual school district. Administrators have whined about union interference for many years, and their willing accomplices in the media often try to make this false reality appear to be the truth. The power of administration is nearly absolute, and individual administrators are too often found asleep at the wheel.

It is interesting to note that NEA appears to have no response to the Wall Street Journal article and the firestorm of criticism aimed in its’ direction this week. As my friend at ReformK12.com, Chett Breiling reminds me regularly, “Sunlight permits disinfection.” The NEA and its’ membership can surely benefit from some exposure of their expenditures, and the NEA does appear to be in need of opposing voices in the decision making process of the organization. The NEA could also benefit from some policy revisions and the resulting makeover in their public profile. It is more than worth pondering how all of the critics would operate a national union which represents more than 2.7 dues paying members. Hopefully, these critics would respond to the needs and wishes of the average teacher.

I am hoping for a local, state, and national conversation on public education that is realistic. Finger pointing, partisan speeches, dogma, and rigid solutions have subjugated the last twenty-five years in the arena of public education. All sides of the debate should participate fully and be forced to offer well-researched and wide-ranging solutions. Our young people are too important to reduce the issue of public education to rhetorical slogans and to marginal cheap shots at teachers and teacher unions. Teachers, parents, politicians, and all community stakeholders must come together and mutually begin the process of developing a stronger learning model. We have a responsibility to provide for the educational needs of all children in America.

Previous:
An Open Letter To Michelle Malkin
More On The Open Letter
Check out ReformK12.com
Read all the links at Stop The ACLU
Check out The Mudville Gazette

Friday Quick Reads




Some Great Reading From Around The Internet. You can also see several headlines and cover pages designed for the New York Daily News on Wednesday this week.




How Alito Would Shift The High Court on Key Issues.
Foolish Democrats to Delay the Vote on the nomination of Alito-how stupid!
Democrats Refuse To Meet Their Constitutional Obligation

Can we stifle Pat Robertson forever?

President Bush Meets With Former Secretaries. The Meeting At The White House Must Have Been Very Interesting.
More on The Fascinating Gathering At The White House.

This Study and Map of Missouri Voting Patterns in Presidential Elections is Extremely Well Done
.

Robert Novak Has Another Interesting Column

Murtha Shows His Stupidity Again.

More from The New York Daily News on the Sad Story from Tallmanville

Thursday, January 05, 2006

Questionable Analysis in The Washington Post

The Washington Post doesn't really understand Ohio politics!

David Broder of The Washington Post has an thought-provoking analysis of the 2006 election. Interestingly, he cites the Governor's races in six midwestern states as the bell-weather votes to watch this year. Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, and Ohio have gubernatorial contests this year. Mr. Broder is probably right in calling attention to these important races in significant states as a primary focus for the 2006 mid-term elections.

As a leading liberal at one of the nation's leading liberal newspapers, Mr. Broder reveals his bias and lack of expertise when he leads with commentary regarding the Ohio race. According to liberals, Ohio is the singular reason that John Kerry is not in The White House. Liberals have falsely opined that Ohio was the closest Presidential state in 2004, while some liberal voices promoted the idea that Ohio would be equally divided on the so-called “Reform Ohio Now” issues in November 2005 as they were on Bush vs. Kerry in November 2004. Voters in Ohio silenced all the critics and left-wing fanatics with stunning, overwhelming, and comprehensive electoral victories in a conservative/liberal showdown in 2005.

The following paragraph constitutes the sum total of Mr. Broder's comments on the Ohio's race for Governor.

No state is more up in the air than Ohio, the crucial battleground in the 2004 presidential race. Retiring Republican Gov. Bob Taft figured in one end-of-the-year survey as the least popular incumbent in the country, with a 17 percent job approval rating. Rep. Ted Strickland now has an open path to the Democratic nomination, while Republicans face a possible primary battle among three statewide officials, Secretary of State Ken Blackwell, Attorney General Jim Petro and State Auditor Betty Montgomery.


Mr. Broder's thoughts on Ohio seem like nothing more than wishful liberal thinking at this moment.

The leading Republican candidate for Ohio Governor is Secretary of State Ken Blackwell. Blackwell became a national star of the Republican party in 2004 when he managed Ohio's massive voter turn-out and unparralled scrunity by the national media. Blackwell is strongly leading his republican opponents in the polls, and polls well against Representative Ted Strickland, the only democrat candidate. Blackwell has the endoresement of several prominent national republican figures including Senator John McCain, Kansas Senator Sam Brownback, former Georgia Senator Zell Miller (a conservative democrat). Blackwell has a strong statewide organization, fabulous visability in the state's major newspapers, and national credentials. As an African-American conservative, Blackwell is well positioned to move forward to the Governor's mansion.

The democrat party planned for Ohio to be the "Florida" of 2004. John Kerry, John Edwards and the enitre mainstream media targeted Ohio, and continue to blame Ohio for George W. Bush's election. There is some thought that Blackwell will be targeted and liberal organizations launched a pre-emtive strike against Blackwell on the 2005 state-wide ballot in the form of several "voting reform" issues which all failed miserably.

Not one state-wide office in Ohio is currently held by a democrat. Democrats have run poorly state-wide for more than ten years and are lacking in one dynamic and appealing candidate. Mr. Border is accurate in saying that Governor Taft has very low approval ratings and Republicans and Democrats alike are sick and tired of Taft. This poor showing by Taft does not mean that Ohio will vote Republican. In fact, the opposite is true!

The so-called "Reform Ohio Now" movement failed miserably in their attempt to embarrass Blackwell. Ohio's solidly conservative voting patterns and the impact of off-year election turn-out is has been carefully examined.

A colorful candidate with great personal popularity would have to have an enormous, almost miraculous turn-out in Cuyahoga County and other democrat strong-holds to win any state-wide race in Ohio. Incontrovertible evidence demonstrates that conservative voters across the state are much more likely to turn-out, and these voters are already energized by Mr. Blackwell.

It is highly unlikely that any democrat can beat Ken Blackwell for Governor, or Mike Dewine for Senate. Perhaps David Broder should stick to topics that are inside the beltway.

Check out many links at Stuck on Stupid
Check Out Real Teen-Right on the Right

Check Out More Stupidity at the Washington Post as reported by Bryan Preston

Wednesday, January 04, 2006

Update: They Made Us Think That There Were 12 Alive...

CNN has put Wolf Blitzer and Jack Cafferty out front this afternoon to defend the abysmal performance of the cable news network last night regarding the untimely and unfortunate deaths of the 12 miners. In their blatant hypocrisy, CNN continues to criticise the owners of the mine as if they control the mainstream media. In fact, in a moment of total self-absorption, Wolf and Jack blame the mining authorities for not noticing their coverage and attempting to correct it.

News Flash: These people were engaged in attempting to save lives. None of the authorities or rescue workers may have taken the time to revolve their pressure-filled world around the misleading and innacurate coverage provided by Anderson Cooper.

Cafferty inplies by saying "the F network" that Fox News had the story, so CNN and Anderson Cooper were obligated to follow their lead!

Furthermore, the media has failed today to resolve conclusively the source of the devestating piece of misinformation.CNN does not appear to be trying to find out who reported the miners alive. Wolf Blitzer keeps refering to an unknown "someone." CNN is trying to make "the story" about the miscommunication. I believe that the story is the failure of the maindtream media to confirm their information. Aren't we all sick and tired of the failures of the mainstream media. So regularly, they report things and check the facts later?!

There is a great deal of accurate information out in the blogopshere.

More at the Poilitcal Teen.
Exceptional Commentary and News at The Anchoress
John Cole At Balloon Juice has a great piece.
Captain Ed details the cruelty.
There are tons of links at Stop The ACLU.
Rush Limbaugh has an unbelievable amount of information.

Check Outside The Beltway for more links.

Tuesday, January 03, 2006

We Thought There Were Twelve Alive...

Late Tuesday/Early Wednesday we thought that there were twelve miners alive. All of the cable news networks were reporting the same story that 12 miners were found alive. Sadly, the truth came to light around 3am. on Wednesday. I was shocked and saddened when I heard the news this morning about 6:15am. I pulled the post I had written last night. I went to bed thinking that these 12 miners were alive. I can barely imagine the frustration, hurt, and anger experienced by the families of these miners.
I have a question. Were the tabloid cable news networks in any way responsible for the innaccurate reporting and hyping of this story? If time permits, I would like to comment furthr on this matter today. It seems that the Television media went too far on unconfirmed reports.
Below is the information that I "live blogged" late Tuesday night:
There are screams of Twelve Alive! in Tallmansville, West Virgina tonight. Anderson Cooper is reporting this information on CNN as I write. No one is awake for me to share this miracle with!

This is thrilling news. Let us all pray that all of these men are alive and well!

Update: 12:00 midnight: AP is reporting that twelve of the miners have been found alive. Anderson Copper continues his reporting that these miners are alive with one man having died.

The niece of one of the miners is on CNN reporting that her uncle appears to be the man who is dead. The man had to get off "at the belt" and then get with the rest of the crew. Her uncle's name is Terry Helms. She plans to go with the Governor to identify the body of this man.

After forty-one hours, this ending seems unbelievable

12:05: Randi Kay of CNN reports on the various families celebrating the news. They are all celebrating 12 alive!

12:21: Apparently the miners who have survived will make an appearance at the nearby Baptist Church shortly. This is truly amazing!

Representative Shelley Moore Capito (She should be running for the US Senate) thanks the creator who brought this all about. Jubilation!! The miners are not all out of the mine yet.

Wall Street Journal Cues Up The Latest Bashing of Public Education

As if following the compulsory cue from the editorial page of the Wall Street Journal, every conservative media outlet, including the blogosphere, is lit up today with “news” about the spending practices of the National Education Association. Although we most often write about Ohio and U.S. politics, and sometimes blog about Theater issues, we also use Thespis Journal to comment on K-12 public education, since teaching is the profession that pays the bills for this household. In the interest of full disclosure, it should be stated that the primary author of this blog is a proud member of the Ohio Education Association and through the bond of unified membership, also a member of the National Education Association.

As an NEA member, I often lament the liberal causes and far left wing issues endorsed by the Association. Surely, The association all too regularly finds itself on the wrong side of the political debate. NEA often takes inexplicable and indefensible positions that seem to be at odds with large segments of our membership. Many NEA members are not well informed about the various policy stances of the national organization. As in any democracy, arduous disagreement characterizes the process

Although I have not personally researched the data today brought to first light today in a Wall Street Journal editorial, the reporting seems to be accurate and is not at all surprising. As a lifetime, common sense, mainstream conservative these expenditures by the NEA are anathema to me personally, but the use of dues money accurately represents the wishes of the majority of our members. There is an annual representative assembly in which delegates from all fifty states are elected by the membership to go and vote on all of the issues of importance to the association. Normally, over ten thousand delegates attend the representative assembly, and as a one-time delegate, I observed the most democratic form of representative government as raucous, unwieldy, and wide-open debate surrounded most new business items. The opposing side was never silenced, just simply out-voted, in this most liberal and deliberative democratic exercise.

Surely no one in the conservative or libertarian movements would undercut the right of teachers and other education employees to organize into professional organizations that provide leadership for our profession, or undermine our right to unionize for the legal purpose of negotiating appropriate salary and terms and other conditions of our employment.

There seems to be little doubt that there should and could be other methods of advocating for our members and our students.

As responsible citizens, we must elevate the intellectual debate beyond mud slinging and harsh, disingenuous rhetoric. The 65 million dollar “give-away” so spitefully cited by the author of Spunky Home School does not represent enough money to operate two suburban districts in Ohio (of over six hundred school districts) for one full year. Are there better uses for the money than some of the shady causes endorsed by NEA’s financial donations? Sure. Well, of course there are better uses for the money, but it is simply laughable to suggest that 65 million dollars would go very far for a National Organization representing two million teachers in countless school districts across the nation. The lingering and obvious question is how a parent would use this spending, over which they have no control, as an excuse to home school. Home schooling is a right and choice with which I would not argue, but surely there is imperical evidence for home schooling that is unchallenged well beyond the flimsy reason that NEA spent 65 million of their funds to advance liberal causes. These defensive cheap shots at the NEA undercut and undermine the uncontested choice made by home schooling parents to “educate” their children at home. These sniping comments also do nothing to further the debate about reforming and improving public education which no responsible conservative politician ever even suggests that we dismantle.

If home schooling parents want to challenge NEA members and public school teachers, at least do so on plausible grounds. NEA does not speak for every individual member of the organization, and the sweeping and simplistic view that “all public school teachers and public schools must be bad because the leadership of one of their unions supports liberal causes” is suspect reasoning at its’ best, and simply stupid at its’ worst.

Like me (a public school teacher) most home schooling families vote conservative, yet I strongly support public education. We find ourselves in a coalition that elected Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush. There is not one cohesive conservative philosophy of public education. In fact, the “No Child Left Behind” legislation resulted in massive increases in federal funding of public education. Is this the conservative view?

The random bashing of schools is fashionable on talk radio, conservative columns, and in the blogosphere. There is little discussion of the break down of the family, poor parenting, and lack of parenting which plagues many children serviced by our public education system.

LaShawn Barber explicitly calls for parents to home school if they cannot afford private schools, and the excuse of the moment is the liberal spending patterns of the NEA. These expenditures appear to provide the curious rationale for home schooling or private schools. This limply constructed logic laced with broad intellectual leaps and cumbersome hyperbole seems to form the insecurely woven tapestry of thought behind the incessant bashing of public schools. These examples of thinking are not indicative of great conservative reflection, philosophy, or direction.

Speaking of philosophical viewpoints, if we were to follow Bryan Preston’s logic that public dollars are paying the dues for NEA members, there should be outrage in the public over “tax dollars” buying my house, my car, and supporting conservative candidates and causes for the past twenty years. Junk Yard Blog is one of my favorites, and they have been so good to allow me to track back numerous articles, but I cannot agree with Bryan this time. In fact, friends in the blogosphere often deride my slightly different view of public education. I hope that no one will attempt to silence my sincere effort to further this debate.

Moreover, it is much easier for the defeatists, these champions of privatization, to take cheap shots at every public school and schoolteacher because of the actions of one. The prevailing conservative “news” paradigm allows only pessimistic stories promulgated by the mainstream media to constitute the entire vocabulary of news reporting. Conservatives use this one-sided reporting to further their thesis of bad “government schools.” I am glad that I did not stop reading columns and blogs because there are a few blogs out there that certainly are irresponsible, inaccurate, and unprofessional. There are bad bloggers, bad teachers, bad superintendents, bad politicians and bad journalists to be found throughout the United States. Because all public schools are supported by state, local, and federal tax dollars, every incidence of poor behavior is magnified beyond its breadth and scope and each overblown occurrence makes an easy and ready-made target for the anti-public school alliance which always seems to be lurking in the wings.

There is an abject and on-going failure of any media sources, including and especially the blogopshere, to report and amplify the great accomplishments of public education. Instead. the media reports the remote examples of extreme and uncharacteristic behavior in a tabloid manner. These sensationalist methods permit the media to create sensational outbursts and false cries about isolated errors in judgment and professionalism among public school employees.

Most voices in the conservative movement, including most of the bloggers, randomly attack the public schools without engaging in a credible discussion about the largely successful suburban and rural public schools across the nation

I would love to promote and authentic debate regarding the role and function of public education. Please take the time to look at other links regarding public education.

Here is the Wall Street Journal Artcile that started it all.

Previous:

An Open Letter to Michelle Malkin
Update: An Opn Letter To Michelle Malkin
Update II: An Open Letter To Michelle Malkin
More On The Open Letter
Chett Breiling is wonderful check out his work at ReformK12
Check out this article at ReformK12

Monday, January 02, 2006

This Was Probably Truly Funny!

John Podhoretz of the New York Post, a pundit and editorialist, commented on Liza Minnelli's performance of the Kander and Ebb composed anthem for the greatest city in the world, "New York, New York." Composed for the 1977 film of the same title, "New York, New York" has come to symbolize everything magical, defiant, and effervescent about Manhattan Island. Minnelli was singing in honor of the second inauguration of Mayor Michael Bloomberg. Podhoretz sounds like a professional reviewer in his hilarious and vivid comments. Any time that I have heard Minnelli in the last few years, she has sounded awful! I am certain that this was a moment worth of the carnival of the insanities!

"THE world will little note nor long remember the words spoken by Mayor Bloomberg yesterday as he gave his second inaugural address in City Hall Park. In fact, I'm writing these words only five minutes after he finished speaking, and I've already forgotten 95 percent of what he said.
Now, I have to admit that's due to the fact that I am curled in the fetal position on the floor attempting to recover from the horrifying sound of Liza Minnelli screeching her way through "New York, New York" immediately following the Bloomberg speech.
There hasn't been a public performance this unimaginably awful since William Hung sang "She Bangs" on "American Idol." If Bloomberg was involved in selecting Minnelli to perform her unique brand of entertainment, impeachment should be considered — solely on the grounds of horribly faulty decision-making. At least Minnelli was memorably grotesque. The mayor's 20-minute speech was the rhetorical equivalent of strawberry Jell-O. Just don't give Liza a microphone again. Ever. Or I will be making a citizen's arrest."


Read the article in The New York Daily News also.

2006 No Better for Blanco

In a recent post, I pointed out that a google search entitled "Kathleen Blanco Failures" netted over two hundred thousand results. It seems that the search was at least one hit short.
Shortly after the two hurricanes, Gov. Kathleen Blanco decided to renovate some of her staff's offices. At the time of her decision, Blanco also was hinting at deep budget cuts to state programs and the possibility of laying off 20 percent of the state workforce.The project cost $564,838.
The newly refurbished office space on the sixth floor of the State Capitol includes hookups and mounts for two flat screen televisions, Swedish granite countertops, walnut paneling and frosted laminated glass. The floor, which will not be accessible to the public, was redesigned to add three new offices, a conference room, and file storage areas.


WOW! Just when we all thought it couldnt get any worse when she was named one of the nation's worst Governors.

I wish that CNN, MSNBC, and Fox News could all feature a series of stories called Blanco's failures. If she were a conserrvative Republican, you be assured that she would have been blasted by the media for her multiple failures.

Get more detail from Michelle Malkin.

Also:Check out Betsy's Page
Ms. Underestimated has more coverage.

More on the "Open Letter"

I recently received a wonderful email message from Chett Breiling who operates a Blog called: Reformk12.com. From the letter you can see that he is challenging my open letter to Michelle Malkin from November 27, 2005. We at Thespis Journal welcome this debate, and I personally hope to promote a realistic debate which could someday result in common sense reform and improvement of our public education system.
Mr Manley,
I just wanted to tell you that I've enjoyed what you write, and as a high school teacher myself, I appreciate your obvious dedication to the field. Looking at various entries of Thespis journal over the past weeks I see a lot that makes me believe that you are a kindred spirit. Your love of music and involvement with student theatre brought back many fond memories for me. And of course you seem to hold conservative values near and dear.
But your series beginning with the open letter to Michelle Malkin was way off the mark, uncharacteristically so, I might add.She wasn't bashing ALL public school teachers, but she was airing some legitimate criticism. And when she mentioned "Reason number 95,385 to keep your kids out of government schools" I thought to myself, "Why such a low number?" The reason I agree with her is that "government schools" is a euphemism for schools that stay open only because they're run by the government, where parents have no say and no choice.

Personally, I attended a high school in the western suburbs of Philadelphia, where the student body ran the gamut of the socioeconomic spectrum, but which was primarily white bread. I received a decent education although even then I could see that standards were declining. But every one of my teachers, especially in high school, was relentlessly competent, if not an expert in their fields, and they all were professional and literate.

It wasn't until I began my career as an inner-city public school teacher that my eyes were truly opened. Public education in Philadelphia can most accurately be described as a train wreck. Of course there are magnet schools where kids have the opportunity to get an okay education, but as far as the neighborhood schools go, well, the kids are basically screwed.

As a socially conscious human being and a teacher, this does not sit well with me. Of course I work my tail off, but I'm not blind to what I see in the schools where I've taught. Incompetent administrators and incompetent teachers have pretty much infected the system, but even many dedicated teachers are using ineffective means (such as calculators in math class to substitute for mastery of basic skills, to name just one of a hundred examples). But I think you'd be shocked at the number of ADMINISTRATORS who can't reliably match subject and verb when communicating!

The system is broken, the kids are screwed, and NOT ONE of these schools (where educational malpractice is more common than effective teaching) is in any danger of reform simply because of two reasons: a) Neighborhood parents are forced to send their children there (if they can't afford private school, which many can't) b) the schools are run by the government.

So yes, I see where Malkin's coming from, and no I don't take offense at her comment because I know she's not describing me. And I'm pretty sure she's not describing you (or any of your colleagues at Xenia High) either.

Well, Mr. Breiling’s letter gives me pause and the desire to respond. As many of you know from reading the updates on Thespis Journal and on Red State, the open letter to Michelle Malkin generated a large response. However, none of these writers (including Mr. Breiling) have addressed the primary concerns raised in my original letter. Here is a synopsis of the principle points of the open letter.

  • The employer, in this case the School District, swiftly and firmly handled the concern with the teacher in question, Mr. Chenkin. What more can Ms. Malkin ask of any employer in dealing with the discipline of an employee?

  • Michelle Malkin, Neil Boortz, and others known to endlessly bash public education without regard for the random nature of their evidence, never acknowledge or report the multi-layered success stories that surround many public schools and their students and teachers.

  • The sweeping view of Ms. Malkin and others within the conservative movement of associating Mr. Chenkin’s demeanor with the overall character of public education and public educators (commonly known to Neil Boortz and others as government schools) is fatally flawed.

  • There is an abject and on-going failure of any media sources, including and especially the blogopshere, to report and magnify the great accomplishments of public education in the same tabloid manner in which the media creates sensational outbursts and false cries about isolated errors in judgment and professionalism among public school employees.

  • Most voices in the conservative movement, including most of the bloggers, randomly attack the public schools without specific information, and without engaging in a credible discussion about the largely successful suburban and rural public schools across the nation.

  • The administrative ranks are filled with a disproportionate number of inept, unskilled, amateurish, unsophisticated, and insular people.

  • By continually depleting funds from the public education system, mandating that public schools must subject their students to an endless battery of high stakes tests, and by creating a system of mismanaged, inexplicable, and unaccountable charter schools, conservatives in the state of Ohio are trying desperately to starve the public schools and institute a “pay to play” system of public education which does not provide a fair and equitable education for ALL students. The original statement stands: Conservatives in Ohio want to dismantle and eliminate public schools. Politicians that I have helped elect have told me this privately, but they know that the voters are not ready for this solution.
  • Let us compare apples to apples in comparing the academic achievements of students in all school systems. Let’s compare several students from several schools with two parents at home who are engaged in rearing the students. Let us compare and contrast the portfolio assessments of students whose parents have a middle class income. Let us compare the students who have one parent or no parent, or who are never fed properly at home, or who may be lacking in appropriate health care. Let us use a rubric or assessment measurement that quantifies the value of an involved parent or two, or put all of these requisite factors into the overused and confusing set of propaganda that is so often misused to bash the public schools

I consider Ms. Malkin better than the average fool in the mainstream media. A genuinely fair and balanced approach to news coverage should include the many great things going on in public education every day. Conservatives make this precise political and philosophical argument with great fervor every day regarding the war in Iraq. Most of the people who criticize so freely and so often, haven’t even set foot inside a public school in many years, if ever.

By quoting from the original “open letter,” I can best demonstrate the failure of anyone to address the essence, intent, and explicit meaning of the epistle.

"For every Bret Chenkin, there are fifty or more public school teachers who have their students fully engaged in the learning process more than five days per week. For every case of “liberal indoctrination” there are abundant illustrations of dynamic teachers presenting model lessons rich with innovative instructional strategies that many conservatives would find refreshing. These diligent and meticulous teachers represent the best practice of the pioneering American Spirit. A caring, dynamic teacher is the key to unlocking the door of learning. It should come as no surprise, even to us conservatives, that more than a few model teachers can be found at every public school in the nation.”
"Moreover, it is much easier for the defeatists, these champions of privatization, to take cheap shots at every public school and schoolteacher because of the actions of one. The prevailing conservative “news” paradigm allows only pessimistic stories promulgated by the mainstream media to constitute the entire vocabulary of news reporting. Conservatives use this one-sided reporting to further their thesis of bad “government schools.” I am glad that I did not stop reading columns and blogs because there are a few blogs out there that certainly are irresponsible, inaccurate, and unprofessional. There are bad bloggers, bad teachers, bad superintendents, bad politicians and bad journalists to be found throughout the United States. Because all public schools are supported by state, local, and federal tax dollars, every incidence of poor behavior is magnified beyond its breadth and scope and each overblown occurrence makes an easy and ready-made target for the anti-public school alliance which always seems to be lurking in the wings."
A real, meaningful, and authentic discussion of reform in the public school must begin with a discussion of all things done well in the public schools and those things that are obvious failures.

Finally, there is one more issue that I have raised that is never addressed by the critics. This comprehensive philosophy should provide a basis for reform, and promote a scholarly, essential, and consequential topic for further discussion.

While I am a strong advocate of portfolio accountability and comprehensive assessment for public school students and teachers, and I believe that as a nation we should aspire to the ideal of allowing competitive market forces to assist us in creating stronger public schools, I will also vigorously support strong public schools as the foundation of our republic and the hope of future generations. As with many institutions in our society, there is room for significant improvements in the public schools.

Read the article about the open letter at Reform K12.com


Previous:
An Open Letter To Michelle Malkin
Update: An Open Letter To Michelle Malkin
Update II: An Open Letter To Michelle Malkin

Check out The Education Wonk.

Sunday, January 01, 2006

A Special Mention for Thespis Journal

Stop the ACLU has given Thespis Journal a notable mention in an article that they have citing best new blogs of 2005! This special mention at the conclusion of their article is a high honor, and is greatly appreciated.

As you know, we have linked to Stop The ACLU many times. I did not know that theirs is also a new blog in 2005. Stop the ACLU is an outstanding blog and a daily must read.

This recognition was a pleasant surprise for New Year's Day, 2006. We pledge to continue to strive for blogging and journalistic excellence on a variety of topics.

Thanks and Happy New Year to Stop The ACLU and all of our readers.

Stuck on Stupid is Another Great New Blog!! Check it out!
The Nose On Your Face is also wonderful!

Six in 2006!

Happy New Year, 2006.

Here are six stories to get you started for the New Year. Enjoy your New Year's Day reading.






The worst news coverage and statements of 2005 are well documented at The Media Research Center's eighteenth Annual awards for the Year's worst reporting. You have to see the best notable quotes of 2005. It is worth reading all of it to remember how poorly the mainstream media cover stories and reveals the fabrications that they are willing to present as truth.

Good News from New York City! The New York Sun reports on a constrcution boom in the city!!

News Busters
gives us Jimmy Carter's latest confirmation of his own stupidity!

Ten "low-lights" of The New York Times in 2005. This is a treasure trove of idiocy promulgated on the public throughout 2005.

The New York Daily News reports the return of 76 year old Dick Clark to New Years Eve.

The New York Post gives us a stunning New Year's Day editorial: Freedom on the March!