Saturday, December 31, 2005

Live Blogging New Year's Eve


From the Upstairs Loft Apartment in the St. Anne historic bed and breakfast on a cold New Year's Eve.........

The HD TV has little on other than frenetic, harried coverage from Times Square........

I see that Andrew Lloyd Weber's "Woman in White" is playing at the Marquis Theater. I did not know that.

11:34pm/ Mary J. Blige is performning a foolish number in Times Square......The singers are all lyp-synching!

1137pm. "Fantasia" a winner from American Idol is singing on CNN! She is gettin' down!! She is singing "It's All Good! She is freak dancing with one of the college guys in the audience!!

11:38: All Patriotic New Years on the Fox News Channel!

On ABC network, 11:41 Mariah Carey on ABC-gross! There is general agreement that she is lyp-synching and has picked up a lot of wieght!

Regis Philban is on the Fox Network-17 minutes to the ball drop! He is playing games with live audience members! The footage shows that Times Square is packed!!

11:46-Bill McCutty and John O'Hurley are on the Fox News Channel. They are on the street in Times Sqaure. O'Hurley won "Dancing With The Stars" The rematch, and is about to appear on Broadway in the acclaimed revival of Chicago! WOW! Fun in NYC!!

11:50-Anderson Cooper says that he is going commercial free-all the way to 2006! A reporter is on the street talking with people. It is almost that time!

11:51 Regis Philbin is talking with the Donald by telephone!
11:52-Regis reports that it is seven minutes to the New Year!
11:53-Todd Conner reports from Vegas (it is three hours to New Years!)
11:54: Kool and the Gang Live! In Times Square! The "dance" is amazing!! According to CNN, "The Party Is On!"
11:55-Mayor Bloomberg is in place along with Wyonton Marsalis to pull the lever and drop the Ball!
11:55: NBC keeps reitorating that this was a very rough year! It is their typical negativity!

11:56: It is the moment that we have all been waiting for!
11:57 "La-La" is hosting on MTV. It is BAD coverage!
11:57: Dick Clark is voice-overing from someplace. The legend-Dick Clark is having a lot of difficulty speaking!
11:59: We are inside a minute until 2006!

12:00 Midnight! Happy New Year! The Ball is falling! Regis is thrilled!

Happy New Year to everyone! It is pandemonium in Times Square! The confetti is falling!
The song "New York, New York" is playing in Times Sqaure, and the mood is jubilant!

On the Fox News Channel, Juliet Huddey is kissed by Mike Jerrick. She tells him, "Ok, that's enough!!"

Bill McCuddy is singing along on New York, New York, and having the time of his life!!

12:02 am. January 1, 2006: Bedlum continues in Times Sqaure!
12:15am. Dick Clark is in the studio at ABC/Times Square. His speech is greatly impaired, but his try is valiant! He speaks about New Year's Resolutions, and quiting smoking!

12:20: Mayor Ray Nagin of New Orleans, Live in Fox News! He is hopeful for a better year for New Orleans! New Orleans still looks desserted!


Look at this link to the New York Sun which details a great construction BOOM on Manhattan! WOW! I am thrilled to hear the great News for NYC!

Update: See Juliet Huddey cursing on the Fox News Channel. The Political Teen has the video on this link
.
Link to President Bush's New Year's Resolutions from the Mudville Gazette.
Outside The Beltway has commentary on Dick Clark's performance tonight.

Happy New Year!



Happy New Year!
Welcome 2006...

Over Sunday and Monday, I need to collect all of the theater memories and moments of 2005 from Thespis Journal responses and the post on Broadway World into one summary article. I will also try to find the best of the internet for you on New Year's Day, and maybe New Years Eve too!


Happy New Year 2006 to all readers and visitors of Thespis Journal. Best wishes to you, your family and friends! Here's wishing we were all in New York on Broadway to catch the final performance of "Sweet Charity," or "Chitty Chitty Bang, Bang."

You must see this link at Ian's site, the political teen. It will make your New Year's Eve.
Possible in 2006? Check out Stop The ACLU.

Friday, December 30, 2005

Friday, December 30, 2005 Quick Links



Read about some great blogs over at the Junk Yard Blog.

Michelle Malkin is writing about the investigation of the leaks which led the New York Times and the Washington Post to commit treason.
The New York Post has "Broadway Tops/Flops
.

The New York Daily News has all the detail on New Year's Eve in Times Square. More from the Daily News.
The Dayton Daily News has suggestions for New Year's Eve plans. I like this suggestion:

Certainly there are parties, and it's quite possible you've been invited to one or two, but you tend to relish your nights at home, where the confines of your couch and kitchen make for plenty of company — throw in a significant other and a dog or cat and a long-awaited movie, and you've got yourself a great night
.
Ann Coulter blasts Kwanza! Way to go Ann!

Paul Beston at the American Spectator reminds us why George Bush was President of the Year
!

Peggy Noonan gives us her stories of the year!
A great artcile on the economy from the Washington Times.


Some great food and home entertaining suggestions from the Washington Times.

Thespis Journal Awards Blogs of the Year

It is time for us, the staff writers at Thespis Journal, to honor the top blogs to be found around the internet and in the blogosphere. Each of these bloggers have inspired us to do better work, and to continue to write and express those ideas which often go unarticulated in the mainstream media. We at Thespis Journal saltue these expert bloggers, and we hope someday to achieve the status of these distinguished professionals.


10. I really enjoy the extensive blogging at The Gateway Pundit. I don't know how people have the time to keep up with the volume of work represented on this site.

9. Outside the Beltway provides meticulously detailed coverage of a wide variety of political topics. This is worth a daily read, and was excellent on a few stories this year.

8. The detailed articles and commentary from Captain Ed at Captain's Quarters is first rate. There are unusual insights and thought-provoking artiles almost every day. There is always a lot going on at CQ.

7. The men at Powerline provide fabulous insights and top tier writing on a host of topics. This is a daily read, and almost no one can keep up with their volume of material.

6. The people at Stop the ACLU are great blogging friends, and professional bloggers. They allow us to trackback so many of our stories, and they have unique and unmatched coverage of the foolish ACLU. Thank you to everyone at Stop the ACLU!

5. The Mudville Gazette came to my attention just as I started blogging during the Katrina fiasco! The amount of coverage and the variety of topics covered is wonderful. The lay-out and design of this blog is also magnificient! WOW!

4. Michelle Malkin's blog was the first contact that I had with anyone's blog during the 2004 Presidential Election. When she wrote about her horrid experience with Chris Matthews, I knew that we were of a like mind. Michelle's extensive blog is nothing short of amazing!

3. Dr. Sanity: Dr. Pat Santy is marvelous! Her carnival of the insanities is hilarious and newsworty! Her phsychological perspective is so needed in the blogosphere. She is relentless in pursuing the Islamo-fascits, and unyielding in her common sense conservative perspective-and she does all of this while working and residing in ultra-liberal "Athens of the midwest," Ann Arbor, Michigan. Way to go Dr. Pat!

2. Bryan Preston at the Junk Yard Blog had amazing coverage of the Katrina mess. He kep the politicains honest, and I think that he kept the cable news channels, and therefore, all of the mainstream media on their toes! Bryan is also wonderful when he substitutes for Michelle Malkin. Michelle, Bryan, and Betsy Newmark should consider a consolidated group blog-they are all wonderful!

1. The Political Teen: Ian Schwartz: Ian has many videos of news and other happenings that are so easy for us to miss. Ian always has fabulous coverage with a little commentary. He has also assisted me personally on a couple of occaisions. His wonderful site, that he says is about to undergo some major changes, is a daily must read. Ian's ability to sense and replay the top stories of the day is wonderful. I think that Michelle Malkin would be lost without Ian.

HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL OUR READERS AND FRIENDS IN THE BLOGOSPHERE.

Read Outside The Beltway Traffic Jam.
Check out Stop The ACLU.
The Mudville Gazette has a great review!
Congratualtions to Outside The Beltway. WOW!
Check out all of the linked lists at Michelle Malkin.
Many great new blogs were listed on Stop The ACLU. Thespis Journal recieved a special recognition! Thank YOU!
Check out the "List of Listers" at Perish The Thought.
Check out Ms. Underestimated! She is wonderful!!

More on The Transit Strike/Settlement

As always, when the story is no longer determined by the Cable News networks and the mainstream media to be an important story, the real story is written while no one is watching.

From the New York Daily News
: Tranist workers stand to benefit as much as $14,000 each from a refund of "overpayment" of retirement funds from 1994-2000.

The $110 million represents a refund of extra pension contributions that up to 20,000 union members made between 1994 and 2000. The new transit contract will give workers back the 2.3% of wages they paid toward pensions for those six years - plus interest. "It'll probably balance out, but it's actually our money," said bus driver Alfred Kwiatkowski, 50, of the lower East Side. The MTA and Transport Workers Union Local 100 President Roger Toussaint wouldn't comment yesterday, but some workers said the deal made last week's strike worthwhile. "Roger finally got us our money back," crowed bus driver Ray Rios, 48, of Corona, Queens, a 17-year veteran who has clamored for a refund since 2000. "We've been wanting our money back ever since." Thousands of MTA workers like Rios paid 2.3% extra into the pension fund for six years so they could retire at 55 instead of 62. But when the Legislature lowered the retirement age for all MTA workers to 55 in 2000, their extra contributions were for naught.


The Daily News continues in an editorial.


Roger Toussaint and the Transport Workers Union made out like bandits after all by crippling New York in their lawless strike. Those many promises by top officials that a walkout would gain the workers nothing have gone up in a $110 million puff of smoke. That's what the Metropolitan Transportation Authority agreed to pay at the eleventh hour in hopes of persuading the rank and file to ratify the contract. By the TWU's reckoning, roughly 20,000 of the city's 33,700 transit workers will receive one-time payments of $8,000 to $14,000 in a pension maneuver the union has long sought.


As always, excellent coverage in The New York Sun.
The New York Post has more too.

Thursday, December 29, 2005

Let's Name A Theater For Ethel Merman




“I can hold a note as long as the Chase Manhattan Bank”
-Ethel Merman

“I take a breath when I have to” -Ethel Merman

“Always give them the old fire, even when you feel like a squashed cake of ice”
-Ethel Merman


The name and career of Ethel Merman are synonymous with American Musical Theater. Miss Merman’s legendary charisma, allure, and glamour have created a near century long fascination with her singing and acting career. From the time that I became aware of Ethel Merman through her recording of the 1966 Lincoln Center revival of her biggest hit, Annie Get Your Gun, I knew that Miss Merman was a significant, distinct, and remarkable Broadway performer. I have long enjoyed other recordings and stories of Miss Merman’s performances, but none more than her dramatic and vivid original cast recording of her greatest Broadway triumph, Gypsy.

Actor Jack Klugman tells the story of the opening night of Gypsy on May 21, 1959. When Ethel Merman made her “designed for a star entrance” from the back of the house and down the aisle on house right of the Broadway Theater, the house, according to Klugman, went “crazy.” “I had no idea that they loved her that much.” They certainly did love the Merm that much, and the strong adulation continues today more than twenty years after her death, and nearly one hundred years since her birth in 1906.

Ethel Merman: The Biggest Star on Broadway is a wonderful new book by Geoffrey Mark, and once again ignites discussion and interest in the career and singing of Miss Merman. As inspiration for this book review/article, I have also been listening to Ethel and Mary Martin as they sing their way through The Ford 50th Anniversary Show from June 15, 1953. Within Ethel Merman’s voice, one can hear the clarion tone, and reverberant timbre that shook Alvin Theater (currently known as the Neil Simon) on October 14, 1930 when she first took the Broadway community by storm with her thrilling rendition of George Gershwin’s “I Got Rhythm” in the world premiere of Girl Crazy. Although Miss Merman attempted to make a legend of they myth that she came to Broadway as a complete unknown, it is well documented that she had been singing in nightclubs for four years prior to this stunning debut on Broadway. The New York Times review the next morning only hinted at the great career ahead for Ethel Merman. One can safely assume that no one had ever heard anything like this distinctive voice.

“Another is Ethel Merman, whose peculiar song style was brought from the nightclubs to the stage to the vast delight last evening of the people who go places and watch things being done.”

According to the author, Mr. Mark, the opening of Girl Crazy was a career making moment for Ethel Merman, and she never looked back. Her particular delivery of the song “I Got Rhythm” lives as a legend today, and her holding of the A above middle C for sixteen bars over lively Gershwin arranged orchestral accompaniment was well appreciated by the audience of 1930. Cole Porter once said that you better give Ethel Merman a good lyric, because without a doubt, the patrons in the second balcony will hear it as well as everyone else in the theater. This notable projection became a calling card for many of Ethel Merman’s roles as a brassy broad in numerous productions.

Nearly every Ethel Merman book or article produces a new set of stories about the celebrated star. There are a few of these stories which really stand out. In the long original run of Annie Get Your Gun, Annie Oakley’s gun failed to go off one night, but the “dead bird” fell from the rafters anyway. Merman looked at the audience and said, “I’ll be damned, apoplexy!” Merman walked out on a show in the 1940’s due to bad song lyrics. Ethel’s “goon look” upon seeing Frank Butler stopped the show every night on Broadway, and is often imitated by actors playing Annie Oakley. Bernadette Peters had her own stunned, "goon look" when she won the Tony Award for playing Annie Oakley in the 1999 Broadway revisal of this classic Irving Berlin show. Ethel was known for playing all of her lines to the audience and sometimes ignoring other actors. Miss Merman did not forgive Producer Richard Rodgers for 25 years for forcing her to stay with Annie Get Your Gun longer than she had planned. Finally, a warm glow must have settled over Broadway when Ethel finally agreed to appear in the original Broadway production of Hello Dolly as the closing Dolly Levi. While Ethel was in the show, it became the longest running Broadway musical of all time for a period of years. Jerry Herman restored two songs to the score that he had written for Ethel, and she received a super star’s welcome from the Broadway audiences. Originally scheduled to play a limited run of three months (Ethel was already 64 years old). Ethel extended her run to nine months after receiving more than nine current calls on opening night and several standing ovations every night.

There are many personal stories of four divorces, suicide, drug abuse, dishonesty, deceit and tawdry relationships in the life of Ethel Merman. Despite heart wrenching adversity, she kept performing with her characteristic strength and brilliance.

In an uninterrupted string of over fifteen Broadway musical hits, spanning forty years, Ethel Merman established herself as not only the star of Broadway, a superstar of Broadway, but as “the biggest star on Broadway.” It is important to remember that Ethel Merman had a much longer time in the spotlight and more than twice as many genuine hit songs when compared with the fabled Al Jolson. She had more hit shows than Tallulah Bankhead and Helen Hayes put together. (Note to the reader: we already have the Helen Hayes Theater). Mr. Mark even asserts that although Mary Martin was richer than Ethel Merman, Merman was “better.” His book proffers the indisputable evidence throughout his book that Merman was the first lady of Broadway during much of the twentieth century.

Defining the exact characteristics that made Merman a star is a difficult challenge. Her big expressive eyes, out-sized personality, and immense smile lit up the stage. It is widely known that he demeanor as an actor and her style of delivery were well suited to the live Broadway stage in days when there was no amplification of voices. These same characteristics seem to have doomed any hope that Ethel Merman had of being a big movie star. During the decade of the 1930’s, Merman bounced back and forth between Broadway and Hollywood always having a great success in New York, and very little success in the movies.

Undeniably, Miss Merman’s claim to artistic fame was her matchless and unrivaled voice. She continued singing well into her eighth decade of life. Like all performers her voice aged, and sometimes not well. However, there are many recordings that demonstrate that her pipes were still working well for her, even in later years. Opera singer Birgit Nilsson assured Merman that she could have made it as an opera singer, and her luminous voice never failed to thrill a Broadway audience. Ethel did not seem to have a break in her voice, and although many voice experts state that Ethel was the first “belter,” this term fails to capture the breadth and scope of Ethel’s voice and the unique way in which she used her voice. One must listen to early recordings of Ethel singing her hits from the 1930’s and early forties to understand the vocal journey and talent of Miss Merman.

With so many great hits including and especially Annie Get Your Gun, Gypsy, Call Me Madam, Anything Goes, Girl Crazy, Panama Hattie, and her legendary performances in the Jerry Herman musical Hello Dolly in the waning months of the original Broadway run, it is time for the theatrical powerhouses in New York City to insist that a Broadway theater be renamed the Ethel Merman. It is a glaring and unacceptable oversight not to have this recognition for Miss Merman, and she is much more deserving than some recent theater community people who have achieved this status and honor. The span of her career, the illustrious shows that rode on her talent, the eminent songs of Porter, Berlin, and Styne that she brought to fame, the prominent critics, colleagues and audiences which thrilled at her work, and her abundant allocation of shear fortitude and spirit have earned Ethel Merman a lasting recognition of her efforts on Broadway. It is past time to name a Broadway theater for Ethel Merman.

Ethel Merman never missed a performance of Call Me Madam. She rarely missed a performance of Annie Get Your Gun and Gypsy which each had long runs on Broadway. She was an agent, producer, artistic director, actor, singer, casting director, and musician of the first degree. Merman was the greatest exponent of that which made Broadway tick: onstage and off stage, Ethel Merman shot directly from the hip.

Today, those who saw her in Gypsy still talk about her performance as one of the memorable theatrical experiences of their lifetime. Mary Martin won the Tony Award that year for The Sound Of Music, yet no one talks about that performance. The supreme, goddess-like stamp of Ethel Merman will forever lie on the role of Mama Rose. Writing in the New York Times review of the opening night of Gypsy, Brooks Atkinson states all of the following. (Note to the reader: we already have the Brooks Atkinson theater.)

“But trust Ethel. She concludes the proceedings with a song and dance of defiance. Mr. Styne’s music is dramatic. Miss Merman’s performances expresses he whole character: cocky and aggressive, yet sociable and good-hearted. Not for the first time in her fabulous career, her personal magnetism electrifies the whole theater. Ethel Merman is a performer of incomparable power. Gypsy is a good show in the old tradition of musicals. For years, Miss Merman has been the Queen.”

Please join the effort to name a theater for the great one: Miss Ethel Merman!

Top News Story of 2005


During a family event yesterday, there was the unfamiliar sound of unanimous agreement that the number one news story of 2005 is Hurricane Katrina: the personal tragedies, the failure of the mainstream media to cover this huge story in an accurate and fair manner, the outrageous and irresponsible statements of national political figures, and the total breakdown of the local and state elected officials in Louisiana. The misreported, frenzied, hysterical, and derisive coverage of Katrina by the mainstream media drove me to begin part-time bogging in September 2005 in order to express my extreme dissatisfaction with the entire news apparatus.

Everyone involved in our discussion today knew of individuals impacted by Katrina and the on-going life transitions and often-dire circumstances faced by these displaced and shattered people. Countless families and individuals remain homeless and jobless today. Many hard-working citizens still face choices for jobs, homes, careers, schools, and other life-altering moments. Our hearts and prayers go out to all the people still looking to put the pieces of their life back together, and to move on with life in a productive and meaningful manner.
Before Katrina hit the news media smelled the story of the year. Every time that the city of New Orleans is threatened, television “journalists” are whipped into a fury, an almost jubilant ambience that comes across on TV. The wildly hysterical news media then went into overdrive immediately after Katrina hit. First, Shepherd Smith of the Fox News Channel told us that New Orleans had dodged the bullet again. Soon Geraldo Rivera, Chris Matthews, Anderson Cooper and others were claiming massive death, rape, starvation, and agony at the New Orleans convention and the Louisiana Superdome with. As we will soon examine evidence of rapes, murders, and other crimes failed to materialize in the truth-telling aftermath of the storm.
While almost everyone in the mainstream media attempted to blame President Bush, two important elected officials who were closest to the disaster area escaped criticism. Let’s set the record straight once and for all.

The mayor of New Orleans Ray Nagin should be held accountable. He knows the city. He knows the danger. He knows that during Hurricane Georges in 1998, the use of the Superdome was a disaster and fully two-thirds of residents never got out of the city. Nothing was done. He declared a mandatory evacuation only twenty-four hours before Hurricane Katrina hit. He did not even declare a voluntary evacuation until the day before that, at 5 p.m. At that time, he explained that he needed to study his legal authority to call a mandatory evacuation and was hesitating to do so lest hotels and other businesses sue the city.

Louisiana Governor Kathleen Blanco was an dismal failure. It's her job to call up the National Guard and get it to where it has to go. Where the Guard was in the first few days is a mystery. Indeed, she issued an authorization for the National Guard to commandeer school buses to evacuate people on Wednesday afternoon -- more than two days after the hurricane hit and after much of the fleet had already drowned in its parking lots. Time Magazine has succinctly stated the unparalleled failures of Governor Blanco when the named her one of the nation’s worst Governors.
Failures aren't born. They're made. Before Hurricane Katrina, it wasn't the job of Louisiana Governor Kathleen Babineaux Blanco to plan for the evacuation of the elderly and poor from New Orleans. Afterward, she wasn't in charge of the federal response. But it was her job to give her constituents heart by looking decisive, steadfast and capable. Even if she wasn't.
When it mattered most, Blanco appeared "dazed and confused," says Bernie Pinsonat, a bipartisan political consultant in Baton Rouge, La. When NBC's Matt Lauer asked her whether it was hard to find words to reassure the public, she tried to muster optimism, then circled back to despair. "You know, our people out here are so fearful. They're so worried ... It's a nightmare.

A google search entitled “Kathleen Blanco Failures” yields more than two hundred thousand results.
This account at News Busters by NBC’S Lisa Myers demonstrates that even liberal NBC got with the program about Governor Blanco.
Bob Williams, former Louisiana legislator takes Blanco and Nagin to task for their failures in a Wall Street Opinion Journal column.

Mona Charen has an outstanding column in the Washington Times this week regarding Katrina being the misreported story of the year.
Katrina was a monster, and the misery it caused was heartbreaking. But the instant analysis was beyond tendentious. We were told poor people died or suffered because they had no way to escape the storm and were offered none by local, state or federal officials (most of the press reserved its severest scorn for the federal response). But according to a careful examination of actual storm victims by the New York Times, most of those who stayed behind either owned cars or were offered rides by others and chose, for a various reasons (some good, some stupid), to remain
.


Bryan Preston of the fabulous Junkyard Blog summed up much of the failures in New Orleans in the hours immediately following Katrina.
“Most of the death and mayhem was entirely preventable. That's worth a whole lot of righteous fury. But be angry at the people who failed your city. Their names are Nagin and Blanco, not Bush and Chertoff. And be angry at yourselves for wasting the year after Ivan not holding your local politicians' feet to the fire to get the disaster plan updated to reflect the lessons learned after that near disaster.
New Orleans is dead because before the storm it overdosed on "Don't Worry, Be Happy," an attitude that it's now clear extended beyond city hall to include the great newspaper that is supposed to challenge officials and be a voice for the voiceless. The whole city's elite class is complicit in turning the Crescent City into Thunderdome. They failed their own people, and failed the most vulnerable the most horribly.”



The New Orleans Times-Picayune editorialized about the false rumors widely reported as truth by the mainstream media in the hours and days immediately following Katrina.

Nearly a month after the storm, officials have come up with no hard evidence to back up stories of murder, rape and other violence that supposedly happened among those who took shelter in those places. No matter how convincing the eye witness accounts, the bodies that back up their stories aren't there

The toll, after careful inspection, is as follows: four dead in the Convention Center, one by violence: six dead in the Superdome, none by violence. While there were reports of 30 to 40 dead in the Convention Center and 10 to numerous in the Dome, the actual tally has to be given more credibility than unconfirmed reports by traumatized people. During the chaotic week that followed Hurricane Katrina, four confirmed murders took place in New Orleans, a number that's not at all surprising or even unusual for a city that expected to see as many as 200 homicides this year.



Peggy Noonan, columnist extraordinaire and Reagan speechwriter, summarized the thoughts of many common sense conservatives.

Last week I quoted Gerald Ford: “The government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.” I was talking about money. But it applies also to personal freedom, to the rights of the individual, including his right to do something stupid as long as it’s legal, like swimming.

Government has real duties in disaster. Maintaining the peace is a primary one. But if we demand that our government protect us from all the weather all the time, if we demand that it protect us from rain and hail, if we make government and politicians pay a terrible price for not getting us out of every flood zone and rescuing us from every wave, we’re going to lose a lot more than we gain. If we give government all authority then we are giving them all power.


Among the more preposterous of the comments from politicians competing for media attention came from Sheila Jackson Lee, democrat of Texas. Jackson-Lee is often critical of President Bush, and tends to see issues only in terms of race.

“The Bush administration's slow response to Hurricane Katrina may be the result of minority votes being suppressed and Democratic candidates losing the last two presidential elections, a member of the Congressional Black Caucus has alleged. "Watching family members and others cling to rooftops in Hurricane Katrina, I wonder whether or not the absence of attention [to the recovery effort] is attributable to the loss of a vote in 2000 and 2004," U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee, a Democrat from Texas, said. She added that the government's hurricane response gave her the feeling of "deja vu," following the Republican Party's alleged attempts to undermine the black vote in those two presidential elections.”


There are far too many perplexing quotes from hyperventilating politicians to print in this article, however, Rush Limbaugh gives a better summary to this mess than I could ever write.

"It is becoming clear, and has been for two or three days here, of the utter failure of local government and state government to handle the circumstance. Everybody is out there saying, "We need a Giuliani! We need a Giuliani!" What was Rudy Giuliani? He was a mayor. Has anybody seen Ray Nagin? Was Ray Nagin at the Superdome? Was Kathleen Blanco at the Superdome? Were these people there? We saw Rudy everywhere. Yeah, we need a Rudy, fine, but Rudy was not part of federal government, folks; Rudy was not part of any FEMA organization; Rudy was not part of any federal bureaucracy. He was mayor of New York, and when you saw pictures of Rudy on TV the New York police chief flanked him and he was flanked by New York fire chief, and New York City officials, and the governor flanked him, of course, Pataki was there as well. But you haven't seen that in this circumstance. We also know that President Bush on Sunday begged the governor to get everybody out there, declare an emergency. She said, "No, I need 24 hours to decide." We now have the mayor, Ray Nagin -- and we have the audio of this. It happened on CNN today. The mayor is now trying to pass the buck to the governor, claiming that the governor was the one that was holding up the decision-making process. We also know that the governors are in charge of the National Guard. Everybody wants to know, "Why didn't Bush send the Guard?" The governors have to do this, and that's why Bush wanted her to declare an emergency so that he could get a foot in the door. You notice there are no law enforcement problems in Mississippi? There aren't any law enforcement problems over in Alabama. You haven't seen the looting; you haven't seen the utter chaos, but you have seen the destruction. There are reasons for this, and we will get into them this afternoon. The New Orleans police disintegrated, and now the mayor wants hotel vacations for them in Las Vegas."


All of these many circumstances make the Katrina disaster and its multi=faceted aftermath my nominee for the biggest news story of 2005.

You have to see and read this list of the twenty most obnoxious quotes related to Hurricane Katrina. I am not sure how they narrowed the list to only twenty quotes!


Ian Schwartz and Thespis Journal team up to provide great coverage on Lying Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu and her ridiculous statements on Fox News Sunday.

The Mudville Gazette provided wonderful coverage throughout the event. In this article, the history of the bad blood between Governor Blanco and Mayor Nagin is fully detailed.

Michelle Malkin debunks many myths about Katrina.

Check out the best and worst at the Junk Yard Blog.
Check out the open post at the Mudville Gazette.
Check Outside the Beltway for more news.
Lots of other news at Right Wing Nation.
Check out Betsy's page too!
Check out: Stop The ACLU!

Tuesday, December 27, 2005

Treason at The New York Times

UPDATE AT THE POLITICAL TEEN! This is video of John Podhoretz of the New York Post. Thanks Ian!!

UPDATE AT STOP THE ACLU: You have to read this article which demonstrates that the ACLU will promote the Treason at the Times.

A thought provoking and provactive editorial in the New York Post today seems to summarize the thoughts of many writers in the conservative blogosphere. The Times has gone too far this time! President Bush asked the Times not to print this story because it might cripple the efforts of the government to keep us all safe!


Has The New York Times declared itself to be on the front line in the war against the War on Terror? The self-styled paper of record seems to be trying to reclaim the loyalty of those radical lefties who ludicrously accused it of uncritically reporting on Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction. Yet the paper has done more than merely try to embarrass the Bush administration these last few months. It has published classified information — and thereby knowingly blown the covers of secret programs and agencies engaged in combating the terrorist threat.


Michael Barone
has a great column this week about the hysteria of the Times and other organizations in reporting
.
What the Times didn't bother telling its readers is that this practice is far from new and is entirely legal. Instead, the unspoken subtext of the story was that this was likely an illegal and certainly a very scary invasion of Americans' rights. Let's put the issue very simply. The president has the power as commander in chief under the Constitution to intercept and monitor the communications of America's enemies. Indeed, it would be a very weird interpretation of the Constitution to say that the commander in chief could order U.S. forces to kill America's enemies but not to wiretap -- or, more likely these days, electronically intercept -- their communications. Presidents have asserted and exercised this power repeatedly and consistently over the last quarter-century
.

Michelle Malkin puts it even stronger. She makes a compelling case for the Times to be idiotarian of the year!
For its reckless endangerment of national security, unapologetic distortions of our troops' commitment to the mission in Iraq, trashing of 9/11 families who refused to capitulate to political correctness at Ground Zero, routine insipidity and unaccountability, laughable hypocrisy, protectionism for Democrats and liberal pet projects, dishonest Bush-bashing, anti-war pandering, cluelessness by the barrel, narcissism, and skyscraping editorial arrogance and snobbery, I nominate The New York Times!
The political teen has more coverage of the latest leak to the New York Times.

The Anchoress expresses that this treasnous behavior by the Times could become the big story of 2006.

There is extensive coverage at "Just One Minute.
"

With the Christmas Holidays, I am just now processing this story! The New York Times will stop at nothing to harm the war on terror and President Bush. Their professionalism has reached an all new low! Maybe the leakers and the reporters will all pay the price for their treason!

Ann Coulter In The News


Ann Coulter is an author, commentator, columnist, and pundit of the first degree. Recently, she has had some notable appearances on TV including an interview with Matt Lauer on the TODAY show this morning. It is interesting to note that this appearance by Ann was scheduled during a week when Katie Couric is apparently off for the week. Katie and Ann have some bad blood from an interview in the summer of 2002 when Katie and Ann tangled over Ann’s book Slander.

Ian Schwartz has the full video at the Political Teen.

With news leaks that continue to jeopardize the safety of our citizens flowing in the New York Times, there is no better voice than Ann Coulter to be publicly articulating conservative common sense in the mainstream media. Ann states that the leaks have been good for President Bush;s popularity rating with polls showing that the American people want the President to use all means at his disposal to protect our citizens from a further terrorist attack.

The Political Teen also has video from Ann’s interview last week with Neil Cavuto. I have not been able to download this video, but a good friend told me that the interview was wonderful. In the interview, Ann apparently discusses the many volatile circumstances she has encountered when trying to speak on college campuses. This recent column by Ann is one of her best. Here is Ann’s opening salvo to this article.
“I'm getting a little insulted that no Democratic prosecutor has indicted me. Liberals bring trumped-up criminal charges against all the most dangerous conservatives. Why not me?”
This article has a plethora of Ann information Spin Sanity has some anti-Coulter rhetoric. It is worth reading. Here is a headline misrepresenting Ann’s recent speech. This is vintage CNN.

Misreported News on the Transit Strike

It seems that the mainstream media might have gotten it all wrong again. The New York Daily News reports today that the starting salary for bus drivers is much lower than the $62,000 figure that was trumpeted non-stop during the three day strike. The following information is in the Daily News today.
Bus drivers, the largest job title, have a starting salary of about $35,000 a year and a top salary, not including overtime, of about $50,000. Including scheduled overtime, the base pay rises to about $58,500.


$35,00 is not much money to live on in Ohio, but in New York City, this is the definition of poverty! The strike appears to be close to a settlement, but the misreported and underreported facts will likely never all come to light!

While the strike was highly inconvenient, the workers have a right to protect their benefits, and earn salary increases which keep up with the cost of living.

Read the entire article in the Daily News
.
Check out more complications from the long term costs of health care for these workers and the retirees.
Read more in today's New York Sun.

Monday, December 26, 2005

Christmas Eve at 148 Home Avenue


A Menu for Chirstmas Eve Dinner
December 24, 2005

Pan Roasted Rib Roast
Shredded, Herbed, Orange Turkey
Creamed Mashed Potatoes
Orange Honey Carrots
Christmas Broccoli Salad
French Onion Baked Stuffing
Oat Dinner Rolls

Iced Tea
Russian Tea
Coffee

Apple Danish Cheesecake

I spent a great deal of time in the kitchen on Friday and Saturday preparing my annual Chirstmas Eve feast. Everything was homemade and lots of fun to prepare. It also takes a lot of time just to get the house ready.
Christmas Eve is always quiet with tradtional music playing and family conversations. The overwhelming pace of the holiday performances and preparations is mostly over, and there is time to reflect, and look forward to Christmas Eve services, and the most beloved day of the year the next day.
I have hosted Christmas Eve for nine consecutive years, and I have cooked for Christmas Eve several other years with the first time being in 1986-almost twenty years ago at the home of my grandmother; Nettie Powers. This is the house on Wyoming Street in Dayton where Brent now lives.

I would be happy to share any recipes. It is wonderful to have the time to cook great food and see it all come together with the complete setting of trees, poinsettias, candles, and fresh greenery.

Look for Changes coming to The Political Teen

Sunday, December 25, 2005

Christmas In The Cathedral


Annually, one of the most significant and momentous manifestations of the true meaning of Christmas is the splendid, inspirational, and superbly crafted “Christmas in the Cathedral” 10pm Christmas Eve worship service at Westminster Presbyterian Church on First Street in Downtown Dayton, Ohio. It may appear unseemly for any author to publish a review of a Christian worship service, however, the magnificent tapestry of this worship experience including the world-class music, the atmospherics, and the inseparable bonding of the timeless Christmas story with one of the finest Church Choirs in the nation make this participatory worship event worthy of documentation and the highest possible accolades. “Christmas in the Cathedral” is a divine moment of perfectly designed worship reflecting ideal taste and purpose, resplendent with soaring music that produces moments seared forever in memory, leaving congregants awestruck in their heightened awareness of this holiest of nights. Fortunately for everyone in attendance, Christmas Eve 2005 was no exception.

The neo-gothic structure of the nave at Westminster with its’ prominent, stain-glassed Te Deum window (made by Tiffany Studios) is the idyllic setting for this candlelit service. Entering the sanctuary on Christmas Eve one can see the central focus of the dramatic display of Christmas poinsettias, striking picture of Madonna and child, and the gorgeous crystal star that highlight the chancel area. The live greenery and red ribbons are classic, understated decorations that, along with all of the candles, set the stage for a meaningful evening of worship.

The prelude music for the service included the massive Casavant organ, hand bell choirs, flute and piano. Guest artists Claudia Hunter and Steven Hunter provided exquisite renderings of music for flute and piano by Vivaldi and Bach. Passages of great fioritura and broad, expansive phrasing marked these rapid selections. The Andante, Presto, and Allegro from the Sonata for Flute in C Major were particularly notable for their beauty and bravura. Also as part of the forty-minute prelude, both the senior high and junior high hand bell choirs excelled in the presentation of familiar carols in fresh and delightful arrangements. Organist John Neely began the evening with a stirring flourish playing one of his signature pieces the Carillon de Westminster by Louis Vierne. Mr. Neely had many remarkable moments throughout the evening, but his reading of the Vierne shook the house as the great Casavant spoke in majestic tones, and as he proved once again that he is an artist totally in command of the instrument when he is at the console in the choir loft.

In an evening of regal moments, one chill producing, awe-inspiring episode is always the delicate flash of silence prior to the beginning of the traditional and stately choral processional, “Masters in this Hall.” As I write this description, I am overcome by chills again as I hear, in my mind’s ear, the sound in the distance of the men of the choir beginning the first haunting notes of this well-known French Carol. The hush over the congregation allows one to experience each phrase of this glorious choral introit as the choir members begin in the narthex at the rear of the nave and process down the long center aisle to take their places high in the loft for the service. Beginning a cappella, joined by hand bell ensemble, and finally the splendor of the organ, this moving processional is an incredible choral call to worship. This processional builds into an artistic culmination reminiscent of high Anglican worship in one of Europe’s finest cathedrals. In a moment of creative brilliance, the four ringers in the accompanying bell ensemble recess out the center aisle ringing their percussive ostinato, rung on eight Dutch hand bells, until they no longer can be heard in the distance. The sounds of these unique bells, which produce a curious overtone series, is both poignant and wraithlike, and creates a singular moment of calm reflection following the soaring forte of the processional. In its astonishing simplicity, this brief instant of music moving ever forward and off into the distance is evocative of the most poignant images of the birth of Jesus, and recreates the miraculous glow surrounding the mystery and wonderment of every Christmas Eve.


With the choir in place, the service continued with a brisk singing of the first and oldest Christmas Carol: “O Come, All Ye Faithful” using the Willcocks descant for the second and concluding verse. With the choir and congregation singing vigorously, this is some of the finest congregational singing I have ever experienced.


The Christmas in the Cathedral service then follows in prototype of scripture, anthems, and carol singing alternatively as the traditional Christmas story unfolds until the sermon. Each of the distinguished pastoral staff members relate the Christmas story from prophecy to incarnation in a series of memorized monologues that are based upon scripture and delivered in a theatrical manner. The interspersing blend of scripture and music is compelling theater directing one’s attention to worship of the almighty as parishioners are led once again through the drama and magnificence of the beloved Christmas story. The old familiar words of the story ring out over the sanctuary as each Pastor furthers this oldest and most traditional story of the Christian faith.


During this portion of the service, the Westminster Choir presented several stunning, alluring, and glittering anthems. George Frederick Handel’s “For Unto Us A Child Is Born” was a moment of shear joy. Mr. Neely moved his choir at an efficient pace that would have certainly thrilled Mr. Handel himself. This experienced choir utilized every interpretive and expressive device available while achieving miraculous results. Full of shading and nuance, this rendition of a favorite anthem from Handel’s Messiah was truly breath taking and demonstrated a perfect match of choir and organist in balanced unity.


A refreshing arrangement of the French tune, “Let All Mortal Flesh Keep Silence” was also moving in its’ delivery of text and its’ dramatic and powerful conclusion. A pair of John Rutter anthems, “Love Came Down at Christmas,” and “Candlelight Carol,” added luster to the service with hushed, controlled tones in a florid display of choral virtuosity. Melodic lines soared and voices blended in an exquisite unity of luxurious tone. All of the voices sounded comfortable as various choral timbres and colors were utilized to illuminate each anthem and text. The pinnacle of the choral art was achieved in a performance of the Peter Warlock composition “Bethlehem Down.” In this moment of pure worship, the Westminster Choir demonstrated that they are capable of mastering an oratorio chorus in all its fullness and radiance; yet still provide the ethereal luminosity in an anthem such as “Bethlehem Down.” These mesmerizing sounds, produced by a choir of the first degree, are unique and exceptional moments of traditional worship in which singular focus is brought to the Christ of Christmas.

More singing of carols followed the moving homily by the Reverend Dr. George H. McConnel. The carol singing, led by Mr. Neely, involves singing one verse of several carols with interludes being improvised at the organ. Clearly, the carol singing is enjoyed by all, and is greatly enhanced by the artistry and dynamic leadership of John Neely. His dazzling improvisations, each with distinct registrations that explore the outer limits of this great Casavant organ, are rousing and uplifting.

The entire Sanctuary is reduced to only candle light for the final carol: “Silent Night.” Beth Hill, one of the many eminent soloists sang a gorgeous descant as the choir and congregation hum the second verse. The descant is sung from the balcony with the choir surrounding the congregation on the floor. John Neely answers the second and final verse with an antiphon of chimes, and another Christmas in The Cathedral Service is brought to a whispered conclusion.


Mr. Neely’s concluding voluntary at the organ, Flourish on Joy To The World, provided a fitting and excellent conclusion to this wonderful service.


The only criticism is that true worship that is this superb, thrilling, and exhilarating is all too infrequent, and ends too quickly.
Merry Christmas, and thank you to John Neely, the Westminster Choir, and all of the musicians and staff at Dayton Westminster Church.



Music participants: Junior High Hand Bell Choir (grades 7 and 8; Brent Manley, Director)-Senior High Hand Bell Choir (grades 9-12; Jerry Taylor, Director)-Flute: Claudia Hunter-Piano: Steven Hunter-Westminster Choir Soloists: Donna Reece, Faye Seifritt, Brent Manley, Kathy Clark, Deborah Martin, Tom Lehmann, Rachel Andrew Boezi, Beth Hill. Flute: Marcia Wood-Percussion Brent Manley and Christi Wilson-John Neely is Organist-Director.

Friday, December 23, 2005

Christmas Eve Quick Links


There is a great article about Irving Berlin in The York Times. Yes, "I'm Dreaming of A White Christmas."

Here is a wonderful article about the Radio City Rockettes.

This New York Daily News article tells us about "Christmas Evergreens" meaning in this case, TV Specials such as A Charlie Brown Christmas which entertain us year after year.

Captain Ed at Captain's Quarters blows up Tom Daschle for his foolish op ed in the Washington Post.

Click on this link to see a gorgeous tribute to our soldiers.

It looks like the transit workers might get their new contract for Christmas.

The Washing Times has a detailed article on the newly released documents related to Samuel Alito. As I previously stated in this posting, Judge Alito is the subject of a slow, steady stream of negatives from the liberal press.

"As if following the compulsory cue from the left-wing pressure groups, the hysteria of the mainstream media regarding the nomination of Judge Sam Alito appears to have made a deliberate crescendo this week. The penultimate moment of the crescendo came during Friday’s CNN program, The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer, which featured reports highlighting Judge Alito’s supposed position on abortion, and new documents alleged to have been “found” this week. All of this so-called news appears to be part of a larger strategy to defeat Alito’s nomination through a prolonged and co-coordinated attack designed to permeate the public perception of Mr. Altio. The long, slow, and steady drip of left wing propaganda aimed at Judge Alito appears to be a train moving at full throttle."

Here is a great article about special holiday foods
.

"Up On The Housetop" has its musical roots in the Dayton, Ohio area.

Bush is at 50%, Merry Christmas to all!

Merry Christmas


Merry Christmas.


I heard the Bells on Christmas Day, their Old Familiar Carols play.
And wild and sweet the words repeat, of Peace on Earth Good Will to Men
.

RINO Of The Year: Senator Mike Dewine!

As a conservative Republican resident of Mike Dewine’s home county in Ohio, Senator Dewine's evolving pattern of voting like a “McCain Maverick” throughout the 2005 legislative session disturbs me deeply. I am prepared to nominate Senator Dewine for RINO (republican in name only) of the year. Wednesday’s vote on the ANWR provision of the budget reconciliation bill is just the latest political gaffe by Senator Dewine. In the midst of a political crisis for the Ohio Republican Party, Senator Dewine, who is up for re-election in 2006, has apparently decided to bolster his credentials as a moderate to win votes in the upcoming general election. If recent events in Ohio are any indication, Senator Dewine could be in trouble.

Following Dewine’s tactless decision to raise his public profile and join the senate “gang of fourteen” Dewine’s son, Patrick, was defeated in a primary race for the House seat being vacated by Rob Portman. Patrick Dewine out-raised his opponents and was considered a favorite in the race for a while. Early polling showed Pat Dewine ahead in a field of eleven candidates with forty-two percent of likely voters. The contest was heated and there were two main flash points in the race. Religious voters confronted Pat Dewine about his separation from his wife, and the circumstances surrounding his divorce. Secondly, Pat Dewine faced the scrutiny of the local and statewide media regarding his Father’s decision to abandon the conservative fight for President Bush’s judicial nominees and join the moderate “gang of fourteen.” Following Senator Dewine’s decision, Pat Dewine began to slip in the polling, and he eventually ended up fourth in the crowded field of candidates. Despite spending more than one million dollars on this primary race for a house seat, and outspending his opponents more than three to one, Pat Dewine was dealt a humiliating defeat. Many voters cited his Father’s lack of principle as a factor in their vote.

Furthermore, in the general election for the house seat, Representative Jean Schmidt, the Republican who defeated Pat Dewine, former congressman Bob McEwen, and eight others came under national scrutiny by the press in the race for the seat. The media successfully tried to make this election a referendum on the war, and on Mike Dewine’s leadership. Turn-out in the general election was very poor, and Jean Schmidt prevailed, but national recognition was bestowed on the democrat in the field, Paul Hackett who is now running in the democrat primary to replace Senator Dewine. Hackett has used every opportunity afforded him by the mainstream press to blast Senator Dewine.

On Thursday this week, The Dayton Daily Democrat (also known as the Dayton Daily News) hailed Mr. Dewine’s vote against drilling for oil in ANWR. The paper stated that it was, “the second time in a matter of hours that Dewine bucked his party on tight votes as the Senate prepared to recess for the year.” DeWine, who has consistently voted against drilling in ANWR because of "environmental concerns for that pristine place," said he does not believe drilling in the refuge would help solve the nation's energy problem. Instead, he said, the nation needs to look at alternative sources of energy. "Whether you drill in ANWR or whether you don't drill in ANWR, there isn't enough oil, period," he said. The paper went on to add that Senator Dewine had not voted for the budget bill because it would “hurt poor children.” Voting to reduce the amount of growth in spending on Medicaid and foster parenting programs was too much for Senator Dewine to swallow. Dewine joined other well known RINO’S Susan Collins, Lincoln Chafee, and Olympia Snowe in opposing these spending reductions. I hope that the fat lady started warming up to sing when Senator Dewine began echoing Chuck Schumer in his liberal whining about “poor children.”

These votes are gaining notoriety around Ohio. Karl Frisch, a spokesman for Democrat Paul Hackett, one of two Democrats vying to oppose DeWine next year, said Hackett also would've voted against the budget reconciliation bill and against ending debate on the defense bill. But Frisch said DeWine's votes didn't make him a hero to Hackett.

"We're not giving kudos to Senator DeWine for doing the right thing," Frisch said. "He voted for the Republican leadership that twisted arms to get this thing through. He's part of the problem."
Jennifer Duffy, who analyzes Senate races for the Cook Political Report, said the votes might help DeWine in the general election. "It probably causes further problems with conservatives, but serves him well in the general election," she said. "I think that it's two more votes that make it hard for Democrats to label him a rubber stamp."

Moreover, these votes by Senator Dewine only continue a pattern of voting established early on in this congressional session. The NRA is considering endorsing a candidate against Dewine after Dewine was one of only two Republicans to oppose a bill shielding gun manufacturers from liability from damages due to the use of their weapons. Dewine has also voted with the democrats in the past to ban certain types of assault weapons.

Senator Dewine also found himself on the wrong side of the social security debate. Voting with Arlen Specter, Snowe, and Collins again, Dewine voted with the democrats on a disingenuous and politically stupid resolution offered by Senator Bill Nelson that stated, “ "Congress should reject any Social Security plan that requires deep benefit cuts or a massive increase in debt." Dewine had no real reason to support this foolish amendment, yet he must plan on using it for credibility in next year’s election. We could have really used Dewine’s help in doing something constructive and meaningful for social security.

Either Paul Hackett or Representative Sherrod Brown might be able to mount a credible challenge to Senator Dewine. I have never voted for any democrat for senate in my lifetime, but I may now consider it.

Until I stopped to consider it when yesterday’s vote infuritated me and a few of my Republican friends, I did not realize how many times Senator Dewine disappointed us this year! All of these votes by Senator Dewine find me hoping that Senator Ted Stevens will follow through on his threat to campaign against all the senators who voted against ANWR and come to Ohio next year. Senator Dewine deserves it!

Check Out Best Posts of the Year at STOP THE ACLU!

Right Wing Nation Covers More of Dewine's Stupidity!

Tribute to Bob Novak


Robert Novak's final appearance on CNN was characteristically defiant in the face of perceptions widely held in the liberal media. He insisted that he did not really "out" Valerie Plame, and that her identity was widely known prior to his column. Mr. Novak stated that he wished that he had not written the column in the first place because it has caused him so much trouble. He re-asserted that the CIA told him that Ms. Plame would likely not be sent on a covert mission again, and that her name and careeer were well known around town. Valerie Plame was not a secret agent as CNN and the other media have tried so dilgently to make us believe.

Overall, the interview was well done, and provided lots of historic footage of Bob Novak covering many major political stories. The various video tributes to Mr. Novak's long and distinguished service was wonderful.

The entire transcript of the interview can be found here
.

Ian Schwartz has the entire video at the political teen
.

As a footnote, Jack Cafferty "lost it" on The Situation Room today. This is cable "news" at its worst! Read the transcript.

Novak Will Appear On CNN Today

After twenty five years of being the only conservative voice on CNN (The Clinton News Network), Bob Novak will make a final appearance today on "The Situation Room" will Wolf Blitzer." As recently reported here, Novak will join Fox News in January. Novak spent many years at CNN as the lone voice of reason on the Saturday program, "The Capital Gang." He also hosted other interview programs, served as a team of pundits in the late history of "Crossfire," and co-hosted the long running program Evans and Novak with his long term partner Roland Evans. Mr. Novak's column in The Chicago Tribune has continued throughout his tenure at CNN. His coumns are also currently featured at Town Hall.

Mr. Novak was born on February 26, 1931 making him 74 years old-almost 75. He still seems to be working full time. Early in his career Novak was friends with President Lyndon B. Johnson. Mr. Novak has had a distinguished and colorful career.

This is one of the columns for which Mr. Novak has become infamous related to the trip of Joseph Wilson to Niger
.
This article details the circumstances surrounding Mr. Novak's suspension from CNN.
The Political Teen has more coverage too.

Best wishes to Bob Novak for a new and better relationship with Fox News!


Thursday, December 22, 2005

Strike Appears To Be Over


UPDATE:THE STRIKE IS OVER.


Although the unions took a constant verbal beating in the press and in the court of public opinion, the unions and their members appear to have benefited immensely from the three day strike in New York City. Media reports this afternoon indicate that the change in retirement eligibility wanted by the MTA and the city have been taken off the table. While a new contract is not in place, workers will return to work as early as sometime on Thursday, and talks will continue to settle the contract dispute, with the retirement changes off of the table! WOW! The union really gained something by maintaining their current benefit level for retiring workers. They have also apparently avoiding a "two-tier" structure in which younger workers would have a different retirement benefit than the more senior workers. It is difficult to have a union when an "us against them" mentality is the prevailing paradigm. It is very likely that all of the workers will maintain their jobs, and get a decent percentage increase in their wages soon.

Get ALL the latest in the New York Daily News
.
Check out the detail in the New York Times.
GOP And The City continues his magnificient reporting.
Here is an update from the AP courtesy of the New York Sun.
News Max always presents the fair and balanced reporting online.
A worthwhile editorial in the New York Times.
Ragged Thots has a few insights as well.

I love the pictures of New York City. The picture at Forty-Second Street and Lexington (Grand Central Station and The Grand Hyatt Hotel) is a typical NYC street scene at a really bad rush hour. The striking workers should not be forgotten in the cold. The workers and their families have suffered greatly too. The photo of people walking across the Brooklyn Bridge and the other photo of forty-second street on overload are fascinating.

Wednesday, December 21, 2005

Audra McDonald and The Morman Tabernacle Choir


Seeing Audra McDoanld in RAGTIME on Broadway in 1998 was one of the greatest moments I have ever had in the theater. It was a pleasant surprise to hear her on PBS this evening performing with The Morman Tabernacle Choir. Audra is a wonderful cross-over artist who is classically trained and consistently demonstrates great vocal techinique and consummate artistry. This is gorgeous program, and the Choir sings a memorable "Infant Holy, Infant Lowly." Audra's perfomance is embued with her usual intricate phrasing, and warmth of tone.

Christmas With The Mormon Tabernacle Choir Featuring Audra Mcdonald And Peter Graves will air again on December 22 at 1:00pm., and on Think TV Again (digital cable) on December 25 at 5pm. The program is also available for sale at PBS.org.
Four-time Tony Award winner Audra McDonald and actor Peter Graves join the renowned Mormon Tabernacle Choir and the Orchestra at Temple Square in an annual holiday concert that includes African-American spirituals and a medley of contemporary favorites.

NYC Transit Strike Day Two


The New York Times has extensive, and well done coverage of the second day of the strike. Particularly interesting is an article that speculates on all of the fun that the media is having with the strike.

Pat Kiernan, the morning anchor for NY1 News, couldn't suppress a smile as he described "nightmare" commuting conditions in Jamaica, Queens. On NBC, Katie Couric and David Gregory, the guest co-host, opened the "Today" show in stitches, laughing that Santa's sleigh might not get past the city's rigid carpooling restrictions. And when WABC's local "Eyewitness News" pre-empted "Good Morning America" for a second day to broadcast live coverage, the morning anchors Steve Bertelstein and Lori Stokes looked as if they were blissed out on hash browns.

The possibility of jailing union leaders is discussed in this article along with a litany of negative impact stories.
GOP and The City has more commentary today that is worth reading.
The AP has late breaking coverage which indicates that the strike could end sooner rather than later.
In this very insightful article, Eric Fettman explains why it is likely that union can not win this time. Fettman has researched well, and knows all of the details of the past strikes.

Tuesday, December 20, 2005

Columns by Dick Morris

The incomparable Dick Morris has out two columns dated today which are both wonderful. In the first, he explains clearly the pitfalls ahead for the democrats who killed seventeen provisions of the Patriot Act.

"Anyone who wonders whether the Democratic Party in general and Sen. Hillary Clinton in particular are really tough on terror — or are just posing for the cameras — needs to look at the vote by the entire Democratic Senate delegation (excepting only Nebraska's Ben Nelson and South Dakota's Tim Johnson) to prevent closure of their filibuster against the Patriot Act extension.It is particularly galling that Sens. Clinton and Chuck Schumer — whose New York constituents are in the terrorists' bull's-eye — voted to let these vital protections expire."

In the second column, Mr. Morris raises the question of the on-going fall-out from the Valerie Plame mess. In referencing the leak to the New York Times recently revealed by the Times itself, Mr. Morris cites the following essential facts.


"This leak, far more than the Valerie Plame incident, deserves a full investigation to identify who spilled the beans and to whom and how. The consequences of this leak alone merit an independent investigation and, perhaps, a trial for treason."

Mr. Morris' brilliant insights are proven to be accurate many times over. Both articles are quick reads and provide useful insight into these current highly controversial matters.

New York, New York



As has been observed many times, New York City is a one of kind, singular place in America and in the world. The current transit strike has set into motion great angst and frustration. Apparently, there is strong anti-union, anti-transit worker sentiment in the press and in the public. Special Report with Brit Hume on Fox News included statistics and commentary which were all negative against the strike, the union, and the transit workers themselves. As a local union President and Association activist, I am empahetic with the union, however, it seems that they are lacking in any public relations or legal strategy. My colleagues in the conservative blogosphere are covering this strike with their usual intensity and is the strident and ever vocal New York media.

Much is being made of the average transit worker salary of around $62,000. You know, New York is a very expensive place to live. The $62,000 figure is not an outrageous amount of money, and with the MTA carrying a balance of over one billion dollars, it would seem a time for both sides to find an equitable settlement. The conservative media is saying to fire the workers as Ronald Reagan did to the illegally striking Air Traffic Controllers in 1981. I certainly hope that this does not happen. I also hope that the union leadership is providing honest and wise judgement and advice to their membership.

Here are some great links.
Robert A. George has great commentary and links at Ragged Thots.
There is great coverage at GOP and The City. GOP and The City takes the lead on this story.
Michelle Malkin is wonderful, and has tons of detail.
A judge has inposed a one million dollar per day fine on the union for the illegal strike. Lots of other detail in The New York Times.
A blistering editorial from the New York Sun.
Amazing Coverages at The New York Daily News. The Daily News was by far the most useful paper in the balck out of 2003.
INFORMATION ON BROADWAY SHOWS FROM PLAYBILL.COM

Monday, December 19, 2005

NYC Transit Strike


Scroll for updates.
Some of you may have been following the possibility of a major transit strike in New York City planned for Tuesday morning. When I was in New York during the August, 2003 blackout, the absence of public transportation paralyzed the city. I have no particular side in this potential strike, but I am very interested in the well-being of New York City. Thank goodness I am not (yet) currently in New York. Here are some interesting links, and as time permits, I will update on Tuesday.

Various unions throughout NYC promise to support the Transit Workers
.

The New York Daily News provides it latest update
.

The New York Times provides walk-out coverage.

All New York is braced for the worst.

The Strike is on!

More coverage in the New York Post.

A Nasty Biting Editorial in The New York Daily News. I can not agree with it!

10:41am. The New York Post


Secretary Rice Knocks It Out Of The Park Again!


While President Bush should be congratulated on two dazzling performances in his prime time speech on Sunday night and his news conference on Monday, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice continues to be the most eloquent, expressive, and verbally agile spokesperson for President Bush. She has been on the frontline of the current administrative offensive to reframe the debate regarding the Iraq war, to assert the role of the National Security Agency involvement in the surveillance of known terrorists, and to articulate the need for the renewal of all provisions of the Patriot Act. Regardless of whether she is sitting down with Brit Hume or Tim Russert, Secretary Rice is cool, calm, collected, and makes the indisputable case for the administration on all of these critical national security issues.

As President Bush makes an unwavering case for the renewal of the Patriot Act and calls upon the Senators from Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and New York to explain to their constituents how the failure to renew the Patriot Act makes their cities safer, and while Vice President Cheney travels in Iraq and Afghanistan, Secretary Rice compellingly expresses the truest objectives of the administration in articulate and animated interviews that are instructive and infallible in advancing the President’s agenda. Brava to Secretary Rice for a series of impressive performances in her on-going effort to clarify current circumstances for our lethargic mainstream media “journalists” who wait on indicators from the New York Times and Washington Post on the prevailing paradigm to follow.
Appearing on Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, Secretary Rice provided the following succinct rationale for the selective surveillance authorized by President Bush.

Dr. Rice: There is a certain urgency to the kind of information that is attached to detecting terrorist threats within the United States, a certain urgency that is attached to understanding communications between people who are communicating inside the United States with terrorist organizations or activities outside of the United States. And I think we don't ever want to be caught again in a situation in which we were before 9/11, where we know, for instance, the terrorists in San Diego were communicating inside the United States and we didn't know about it. We simply can't be in a situation in which the president is not responding to this different kind of war on terrorism. We exist now in a world in which terrorist attacks are taken from within the United States. And that's what the president addressed.

Dr. Rice continued in her verbal essay on the topic forced to the top of everyone’s agenda by the leak in the New York Times.

Dr. Rice: Well, that is something that is going to be left up to people to discuss. But let me just say it is really a serious matter when we get the disclosure of a program like this because, after all, what we must do is protect from those who are trying to hurt us. Knowledge of how we follow them, how we follow their activities — and, Chris, we once knew about Usama bin Laden's communications because we knew about his telephone. We were able to track it. And then a story appeared in the newspapers and he stopped using it. I don't know whether that would have prevented an attack, but you can imagine that being able to follow Usama bin Laden's communications was critical. The more we get the exposure of these very sensitive programs, the more it undermines our ability to follow terrorists, to know about their activities. We have to remember that in this war on terrorism, we're not talking about criminal activity where you can allow somebody to commit the crime and then you go back and you arrest them and you question them.
If they succeed in committing their crime, then hundreds or indeed thousands of people die. That's why you have to prevent, and intelligence is the long pole in the tent in preventing attacks.
In a striking argument of the need for the Patriot Act, Secretary Rice was once again hitting the high notes which distinguish her brilliant public speech. Well, the president feels very strongly that the Congress needs to renew this act, which has helped to save lives. We have to remember that immediately after September 11th, the administration and the Congress were united in the notion that additional tools were needed to close some of these gaps between what our intelligence agencies were doing outside and what our law enforcement agencies were doing inside. Chris, we set up this system of intelligence and law enforcement and walls between them at a time when the paradigm was threats come from the outside, attacks come from the outside. And then on September 11th, the very terrible surprise was that these attacks came from within the United States by people who had been sitting here for months, who knew our system, and who were communicating.

Secretary Rice is particularly articulate when addressing the President’s bold political calculation that the American people will support him his endeavor to protect them even if it involves highly selective domestic observations. Dr. Rice was boldly and aggressively addressed this issue when immediately pressed by Tim Russert on the Sunday, December 18 edition of Meet The Press. Although Dr. Rice is obviously well prepared at all times for these media appearances, her opening salvo for Tim Russert is amazing in its’ breadth and scope especially when the verbal sparring began immediately, and her answer completely extemporaneous.

Secretary Rice: Tim, first much all, the president has authorized – and it's important to talk about what he's actually authorized. He's authorized the National Security Agency to collect information about the activities of a limited number of people with ties to Al-Qaeda so that there is not a seam between the territory of the United States and the territory abroad. One of the most compelling outcomes of the 9-11 Commission was that a seam had developed. Our intelligence agencies looked out, our law enforcement agencies looked in, and people--terrorists could exploit the seam between them. So the president is determined that he will have the ability to make certain that that seam is not there, that the communications between people, a limited number of people with Al-Qaeda links here and conversations with terrorist activities outside will be understood so that we can detect and thereby prevent terrorist attacks. The president is acting under his constitutional authority, under statutory authority. I'm not a lawyer, but the president has gone to great lengths to make certain that he is both living under his obligations to protect Americans from another attack but also to protect their civil liberties. And that's why this program is very carefully controlled. It has to be re-authorized every 45 days. People are specially trained to participate in it, and it has been briefed to leadership of the Congress and including the leadership of the Intelligence Committee. So in a time when the war on terrorism is not just one in which people carry on activities outside the country but also activities inside the country, the president is drawing on his constitutional authority to protect the country.

Secretary Condoleeza Rice is amazing. As time passes it seems that Dick Morris is a prophet in his book Condi vs. Hillary. Hopefully, Secretary Rice will consider a run for the White House in 2008. Her mastery of the English language, her communications ability, her ability to tackle the tough media, her toughness (does anyone remember her verbal exchanges with Barbara Boxer during her confirmation hearings?), and her vast knowledge base make her President Bush’s number one asset along with Vice-President Cheney. If Condi were a liberal, the liberal press would be touting her credentials as a superstar, and as a champion of the African American Community. Instead, it is left to bloggers and other alternative media sources to hail the political genius of Dr. Condoleeza Rice, and give her credit for her obvious knowledge of world and domestic affairs
.

Sunday, December 18, 2005

President Bush Speaks from the Oval Office


President Bush spoke to the nation tonight from the oval office. I considered live blogging the event, but with Michelle Malkin and others covering that front, I tried to watch and form my own impressions. President Bush did an excellent job, demonstrated his passion for the cause of freedsom in the middle east, and is revealing his unmovable resolve to finish the job in Iraq. A former student called me from Iraq on Friday, and like the vast majority of our military men on the ground, these people are committed to President Bush, and offer him their service and their unwavering support for their mission on the ground.I love the fact that President Bush ended by reciting a portion of the lyrics to a favorite Christmas Carol: I Heard The Bells On Christmas Day.

God is not dead, Nor does his sleep,

The wrong shall fail, The right prevail

With peace on earth, Good will to men.


Judging by the reaction of the liberal press and their democrat co-horts in the congress, it appears that President Bush and his advisors hit one out of the park tonight. David Gergen, erstwhile liberal, was on CNN saying that President Bush missed his opportunity to outline a clear strategy for victory. Does Mr. Gergen really think that there is a clear strategy for victory? Was there a clear strategy for forming our own government when it took more than thirteen years to get the United States of America formed into a "more perfect union"?

Here is the story in the New York Times.
The Full text of the President's Speech is here.
Great comments at The junk Yard Blog.
Michelle Malkin's Coverage is extensive and wonderful.
Ian Schwartz has great commentary and video at the Political Teen.
Instapundit has other related links and commentary.

Saturday, December 17, 2005

President Bush Scores A Direct Hit!

Score a big victory for President Bush! He came out today and laid the truth down to the liberals. In the aftermath of September 11, 2001, he authorized the surveillance of Americans believed to be in contact with members of the worldwide AL Qaida network. In an unusual move, the President delivered his weekly radio address from the Roosevelt Room at The White House, and came out verbally swinging. According to news sources this surveillance has occurred only slightly more than three dozen times since 9-11-01. Let us examine the blunt words of President Bush as stated today.

“As President, I took an oath to defend the Constitution, and I have no greater responsibility than to protect our people, our freedom, and our way of life. On September the 11th, 2001, our freedom and way of life came under attack by brutal enemies who killed nearly 3,000 innocent Americans. We're fighting these enemies across the world. Yet in this first war of the 21st century, one of the most critical battlefronts is the home front. And since September the 11th, we've been on the offensive against the terrorists plotting within our borders.
In the weeks following the terrorist attacks on our nation, I authorized the National Security Agency, consistent with U.S. law and the Constitution, to intercept the international communications of people with known links to al Qaeda and related terrorist organizations. Before we intercept these communications, the government must have information that establishes a clear link to these terrorist networks.
This is a highly classified program that is crucial to our national security. Its purpose is to detect and prevent terrorist attacks against the United States, our friends and allies. Yesterday the existence of this secret program was revealed in media reports, after being improperly provided to news organizations. As a result, our enemies have learned information they should not have, and the unauthorized disclosure of this effort damages our national security and puts our citizens at risk. Revealing classified information is illegal, alerts our enemies, and endangers our country. "

I am glad that President Bush took the fight to the media and the democrats today. With the senate failing to renew significant portions of the Patriot Act, and now this leaking of classified information that benefits the enemy, the liberal and democrats find themselves on the side of terrorism and our enemies once again.
The entire video is available at the Political Teen
Read the entire radio address of today.
There is great coverage at Outside The Beltway.
Read the article at News Max.
The Mudville Gazette is all over the story.
We can always count on Stop The ACLU to clarify these types of issues for us.

Friday, December 16, 2005

The New York Times Uses Year-Old Story to Promote Book and to Rain On The Iraqi Election Parade

Update: Check Outside the Beltway for updated coverage of President Bush facing down the irresponsible media in today's radio address.

Serving in its’ customary role as maestro for the mainstream media, the New York Times today trumpeted the clarion call to all news organizations to create the illusion of a leading story for the weekend that would obscure and obfuscate the positive reverberation sounding forth from Thursday’s vote in Iraq. Almost certainly, the Gray Lady, tireless in her efforts to combat any genuine effort to fight the war on terror, cued up this article based upon leaks of classified information to assist democrats sounding off against the Patriot Act in the U.S. Senate today. By mid-morning, Andrea Mitchell was blathering on, singing in harmony with the writers at The New York Times. As usual, The Washington Post was singing the same tune in an almost perfect unison. In fact, MSNBC devoted two hours of coverage to the topic today between 10:00am-12:00 Noon with Andrea Mitchell filing regular reports that echoed the most strident, left-wing voices in the Senate. “This is Big Brother run amok,” declared Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass. “We cannot protect our borders if we cannot protect our ideals.” Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis., called it a “shocking revelation” that he said, “ought to send a chill down the spine of every senator and every American.” MSNBC perpetuated the story throughout the day casting the entire story as an illegal domestic spying incident without regard for the truth to be found in the breadth and scope of the story.


Fortunately, the brilliant legal scholar Mark Levin had provided an answer by 12:00 Noon on Friday and posted on The National Review Online. Mr. Levin provides us with this legal sketch with which the rest of the story begins.

“Some brief background: The Foreign Intelligence Security Act permits the government to monitor foreign communications, even if they are with U.S. citizens -- 50 USC 1801, et seq. A FISA warrant is only needed if the subject communications are wholly contained in the United States and involve a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power.

The reason the President probably had to sign an executive order is that the Justice Department office that processes FISA requests, the Office of Intelligence Policy and Review (OIPR), can take over 6 months to get a standard FISA request approved. It can become extremely bureaucratic, depending on who is handling the request. His executive order is not contrary to FISA if he believed, as he clearly did, that he needed to act quickly. The president has constitutional powers, too.

It's also clear from the Times piece that Rockefeller knew about the government's eavesdropping, as did the FISA court. By the time this story is fully fleshed out, we'll learn that many others knew about it, too. To the best of my knowledge, Rockefeller didn't take any steps to stop the eavesdropping. And he's no friend of this administration. Nor is he above using intelligence for political purposes, as his now infamous memorandum demonstrates.

But these leaks -- about secret prisons in Europe, CIA front companies, and now secret wiretaps, are egregious violations of law and extremely detrimental to our national security. They are far worse than any aspect of the Plame matter. The question is whether our government is capable of tracking down these perpetrators and punishing them, or will we continue to allow the Times and Washington Post determine national security policy. And if these wiretaps are violative of our civil liberties, it's curious that the Times would wait a year to report about it. I cannot remember the last time, or first time, this newspaper reported a leak that was helpful to our war effort.”

Thank goodness we have experts like Mark Levin who can respond to the ludicrous half-truths promulgated on an unknowing public.

There are signs everywhere that the fractional and partial story told through incomplete reporting by the Times, the Post, and MSNBC is deficient at best and slanderous at worst. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice stated “Bush has "acted lawfully in every step that he has taken. "Scott McClellan said at the daily White House briefing that President Bush "is going to remain fully committed to upholding our Constitution and protect the civil liberties of the American people. And he has done both." In addition, justice department employees assert that the policy has uncovered several terrorist plots including one by Ohio truck driver Lyman Faris who intended to blow-up the Brooklyn Bridge. Michele Malkin has extended and comprehensive coverage on the story of Lyman Faris that is not included anywhere else.

On Hardball with Chris Matthews, Tom Brokow was singing the same tune as all of the other left wing journalists in saying that this news came on a day of a vote on the Patriot Act “when we now know that the administration was operating outside the law as we know it.” According to Ian Schwartz at The Political Teen, host Chris Matthews repeatedly asked the question to Anne Kornblut as to why The New York Times would choose today to expose this year-old story. Mr. Matthews got a host of disingenuous answers from Ms. Kornblut and Howard Fineman of Newsweek including that there was “room in the paper today,” and that the editors of the New York Times never even considered the unusual convergence of today’s news events. It seems that MSNBC has played host to the largest conflagration of liberal kook journalists in the history of cable news.

At Red State, author Dpayton, has a wonderful synopsis of today’s story in the Times. “But now we've given the terrorists new information--that anything seized in the war could be used immediately--and now they'll change their precautions. This means one less opportunity to prevent the loss of life of potentially thousands. What we have here is yet another intelligence leak.” And John Hinderaker at Powerline sums it up this way: “Under the Plame precedent, this case is a no-brainer. The intelligence officials who leaked to the Times should be identified, criminally prosecuted, and sent to prison.” The Times believes that it should be the arbiter of what will and will not help the terrorists and thus impair our national security.”

Over at News Busters, Noel Shepherd has linked the sale of James Risen’s new book to the splashy release of the front page article today. The Drudge Report, in an exclusive, just announced that this story by James Risen and Eric Lichtblau is just “one of many ‘explosive newsbreaking’ stories that can be found -- in [Risen’s] upcoming book -- which he turned in 3 months ago!” Yet, “The Times failed to reveal the urgent story was tied to a book release and sale.”

Stop the ACLU has extensive coverage of today’s artifical outrage at The Times, and the reaction by the ACLU. Perhaps James Joyner at Outside The Beltway sums up the rationale for the adminstration’s action in these matters. “As to the searches themselves, there's not enough information here to cause a red flag to go up. Presumably, the NSA doesn't have the time or inclination to eavesdrop on random Americans, preferring instead to concentrate their efforts on those whom they reasonably believe are tied to terrorists.” Providing the proper and authoritative context of these investigations as the essential apparatus for the protection of American citzens does not seem to be a role for the liberal media in America.

Certainly, the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the frantic liberal press caused an infatuation with this story today, and the obsession is likely to continue for most of weekend including obligatory mentions on all of the Sunday news programs. Some of the shows may even make it the topic of the entire program. With the defeat of the Patriot Act today, our media seems to be awestruck by the publication of a year-old story on the front page of the New York Times. The editors and publishers of the Times must be feeling on top of the world tonight. Their ability to stage-manage a news cycle is unsurpassed as demonstrated by all of today’s events.

Right Wing Nation has many weekend stories worth reading.

Bill Maher appears on Larry KingLive!/Gets Nominated for "The Carnival of the Insanities"

Hopefully, you have had the pleasure of reading "The Carnival of the Insanities" as published by Dr. Sanity each Sunday. I have a "big time" nomination this week, and I trust that it might make the list.

Bill Maher appeared for the full hour of Larry King Live! on Thursday, December 15. There are several quotes which have earned him this prestigious nomination. Just look at this first exchagne with Larry King.

KING: What do you make of the president's tour, the victory tour, making speeches, media appearances, et cetera, and he's gone up in the polls?

MAHER: Yes, well because he's finally admitting that he made some mistakes. He showed a little humility, which is nice for a lot of us who didn't like him from the beginning to see and those people who have over the time he's been in office realized he wasn't the man they thought he was. It's nice to see that.That doesn't mean it fixes anything, you know. He's just admitted what we all knew from the beginning. You know this administration is always kind of a, you know, they do the right thing after they've exhausted all the possibilities of doing the wrong thing.

Mr. Maher expresses his expertise on the Katrina disaster in this next colloquy with Larry.

KING: All right. What will happen to those who are -- what's in New Orleans? How do you see a way out of here with FEMA and people still out of their homes and back and forth on sending invoices?

MAHER: You would think that the president, man, he has got to come up with some sort of strategy to get his head out of his ass. You would think that after the debacle of the immediate storm when FEMA didn't show up that they would be so on the case in the follow up. But even that didn't happen and it just shows you that, I'm sorry, but these Republicans, I wouldn't say all Republicans, but this crowd in this administration they don't know how to govern.

In the next exchange, Bill Maher comes close to naming his favored candidate for President in 2008.Does Mr. Maher truly believe that there is no liberal party today?

MAHER: Well, you know what, I think the Democrats have some people. I mean, I like, you know, Biden. I like John Edwards. I like Wesley Clark. But again, they're going to have to come out and be the liberal progressive party. They can't go down the road that the last two elections have led to their disaster. They can't try to be just Republicans of a different name.

KING: You're doing that as an analyst, because earlier you said you weren't a liberal.

MAHER: Yes. Well, I'm not -- what I said is I'm not liberal on everything. But I do think that we need to have the balance that we used to have in this country where there is a liberal party. We used to have a liberal wing in both parties. There was a liberal wing, as you will recall, of Republicans.

Next Mr. Maher spins out a whopper of "blame America first" rethoric.

I think America needs to hear more of that. I think America's big problem, and I bet you most Canadians would agree with this, is that America needs to get over itself. Really. I mean, this nonsense I hear constantly coming out of Americans about, it's the greatest country in the world. First of all, how would you know it was the greatest country in the world? Have you done a study of the health care program in Denmark compared to ours? Or the tax program? No, you haven't. You're just saying that. You're just pulling it out of your behind. It's so silly and it's so childish to have to be the greatest country.

Maybe it's just the greatest for us. I'm not moving anywhere. I like it here, but to say it's the greatest country in the world -- it's like saying, I have the greatest wife in the world. Not just the greatest for me, but everybody else. If everybody else could get rid of their wife and have my wife, they would do it in a second! Because I've got the greatest wife in the world! It's silly. It's childish, and it leads us to bad places when you have that kind of hubris.

The final insult came late in the program with two almost unbelievable statements. The entire quote is in bold to emphsize Mr. Maher's words.

MAHER: Yes, and that certitude, I mean, this administration, which I'm sorry to say, I know you don't like to talk about this, but only comes from a religious background when you are that sure of things. What does that lead to when you are so sure of yourself? When you are so sure that everything comes from God?

Maher: And maybe the next time Americans go to vote, they won't vote for the guy who they want to have a beer with. You can say what you want about Al Gore and John Kerry, they were readers. They read things. They knew things about other countries that he didn't. Maybe he would have gotten that idea before this caller did. And the Bush administration idea in Iraq has always been, there's the bad guys. Well, it's not really good guys and bad guys. It's Sunnis and Shiites, right? And the people there seem to have a loyalty to their tribe and their religion much more than to democracy or another way of life. It's sort of like asking the Red Sox fans to vote for the -- to root for the AL East, you know? That's just not where they are.
(Check out the linkfest at Outside the Beltway)

These liberals never disappoint mainstream conservatives from middle America with their ability to create a reality that must exist only on either coast in America. Here's a toast to Mr. Maher's unstoppable nomination!!

There is more news of democrat insanity over at The Mudville Gazette. You'll love it!
More of CNN's foolishness at The Political Teen.

Bob Novak Leaving CNN/Joins Fox News


The ever insightful Robert Novak is leaving CNN after 25 years. even better is the fact that Mr. Novak will begin appearing on Fox News as a contributor in January. I find that Mr. Novak is immensely informative and he has sources that seem to elude others. News Busters has addtional coverage. It will be refreshing to see Mr. Novak join the fair and balanced team at America's news channel.

Outside the Beltway has more coverage.

A Legend is Dancing Once Again on Broadway




One can hardly imagine being in the Schoenfeld Theater (formerly the Plymouth Theater) on 45th Street this past Monday for the opening night of what must be Chita Rivera's last major contribution to the catalog of the American Musical Theater. With a career that spans over fifty years in the theater, and with roles in the original Broadway productions of West Side Story, Bye Bye Birdie, Chicago, The Rink, and The Kiss of the Spider Woman, Chita Rivera is truly a living legend in the theater. Rivera is the 2002 recipient of the prestigious Kennedy Center Honors, and has been described as the Goddess of the American Musical Theater by Broadway and television star Bebe Neuwirth.

In his review in the New York Post, Clive Barnes sums up this wonderful evening at theater. I often find Mr. Barnes to be most in line with my view of shows, and when I spend only two weeks, or a little more in New York each year, I use Barnes’ reviews as a guide to the particular merits of individual shows. “So, This is Your Life, Chita Rivera, and it is all — the public part of it, at least — up on display, starting last night at the Schoenfeld Theatre. "Chita Rivera: The Dancer's Life" starring — there could hardly be an understudy unless Philip Seymour Hoffman wanted to volunteer — the 72-year-old Rivera in the still-astounding flesh, is a sweetheart of a show. This ardent love letter to one of the theater's adored divas is also an invitation to her multitude of fans to take a visit with her and enjoy a far from simply nostalgic stroll down a lane called Broadway.”

The web page for the show, The Dancer’s Life is remarkable. Less than ten years ago, Broadway musicals seemed to be so far removed from those of us who live a great distance from New York. All of these internet sources bring the show right into our homes.

This Chita Rivera home page has an amazing amount of information including pictures, a biographical sketch, and fascinating detail about Rivera’s career.


In his New York Times review, Ben Brantley is splendidly colorful as he illuminates and illustrates the distinctiveness of the production, drawing us, the audience, into the thrilling world of the theater along with him.

"When Chita Rivera invites you to come on, babe, and help her paint the town, no one with a pulse is going to feel like refusing. Ms. Rivera was the first Velma Kelly, the homicidal hedonist from the Kander-Ebb musical "Chicago" in its first Broadway incarnation in 1975. And when she delivers that show's exultantly jaded theme song, "All That Jazz," at the end of her autobiographical show, "Chita Rivera: The Dancer's Life," Ms. Rivera makes it quite clear, thank you, that she still owns the part.Oh, sure, other actresses have done very well by nasty old Velma since Ms. Rivera first embodied her. Bebe Neuwirth won a Tony for the 1996 revival and Catherine Zeta-Jones, an Oscar for the 2002 film version. But all Ms. Rivera has to do is cock a hip, arch an eyebrow and unleash her sinewy alto to prove that her "All That Jazz" is the "All That Jazz." As she finishes the song, she might as well be blowing the smoke off a hot pistol, while imaginary would-be Velmas lie dead at her feet."

This link to photos from the opening night festivities at Broadway.com is amazing. Also, the review at Broadway.com is also worth reading. There is the usual great summary of reviews at Broadway.com.

Of the many articles at Playbill.com, this one is the most complete.

It will be a thrill to see this show (hopefully) in June when I return to the city.

Thursday, December 15, 2005

Why We Must Finish The Job In Iraq

Over the past four weeks, President Bush has made a cycle of three successive speeches leading up to the historic vote in Iraq today. The President has once again articulated the case for vigorously pursuing the war on terror that is well understood by many Americans. Facilitated by the designs and intentions of the liberal media, the latest outrageous anti-war oratories often eclipse the Presidents message. While the mainstream media caters to and magnifies the views John Murtha and Nancy Pelosi, liberal media figures such as Bill Moyers continue their uninterrupted tirade as the biased press attempts to stifle the message of the administration.

In celebration of the Iraqi vote today, for my own edification, and to create an irrefutable document of the case to finish the war, I wanted to publish a concise synopsis of the President’s own words in defense of the current Iraq policy. Here then are the top ten points made by President Bush during the last month of setting the record straight on Iraq.

1. September 11, 2001, our nation awoke to a sudden attack, and we accepted new responsibilities. We are confronting new dangers with firm resolve. September 11 changed our country. It changed the policy of our government

2. We are hunting down the terrorists and their supporters. We will fight this war without wavering. And we will prevail. We adopted a new strategy to protect the American people. We would hunt down the terrorists wherever they hide. We would make no distinction between the terrorists and those who harbor them

3. In the war on terror, Iraq is now the central front. This is an enemy without conscience. And again, such enemy, there is only one effective response. We will never back down, we will never give in. And we will never accept anything less than complete victory.

4. Given Saddam's history, and the lessons of September 11, my decision to remove Saddam Hussein was the right decision. Saddam was a threat, and the American people and the world is better off because he is no longer in power.

5. As I stated in a speech in the lead-up to the war, a liberated Iraq has showed the power of freedom to transform the Middle East by bringing hope and progress to the lives of millions. So we are helping the Iraqi people build a lasting democracy that is peaceful and prosperous, and an example for the broader Middle East.

6. The stakes in Iraq are high. And we will not leave until victory has been achieved. Victory will be achieved by meeting certain objectives. When the terrorists and Saddamists can no longer threaten Iraq's democracy. When the Iraqi security forces can protect their own people, and when Iraq is not a safe haven for terrorists to plot attacks against our country. These objectives, not timetables set by politicians in Washington, will drive our force levels in Iraq.

7. Today there is an intense debate about the importance of Iraq to the war on terror. The constant headlines about car bombings and killings have led some to ask whether our presence in Iraq has made America less secure. This view presumes that if we were not in Iraq the terrorists would be leaving us alone. The reality is that the terrorists have been targeting America for years, long before we ever set foot in Iraq. We were not in Iraq in 1993 when the terrorists tried to blow up the World Trade Center in New York.

8. They know they cannot defeat us militarily. So they are trying to break our will in the hopes of getting America to leave the battlefield early. And they cite Vietnam as a reason they can prevail. The enemy has only the ability to create chaos for the cameras with spectacular acts of violence.

9. There is only one way that terrorists can prevail, if we lose our nerve and leave before the job is done. And that is not going to happen on my watch. Failure is not an option. Iraq would become a safe haven from which terrorists could plan attacks against America, American interests abroad, and our allies

10. Some of the most irresponsible comments about manipulating intelligence have come from politicians who saw the same intelligence I saw, and then voted to authorize the use of force against Saddam Hussein. These charges are pure politics. They hurt the morale of our troops.

These strong words by President Bush are indisputable and convincing. We must not allow the white flag democrats and Cindy Sheehan kooks dominate the debate any longer. President Bush is as right today as he was when over fifty million Americans returned him to office in November 2004.

May God Bless President Bush, Vice-President Cheney, Secretary Rice, and Secretary Rumsfeld as they stand firm in the face of unrelenting political opponents at home. History will relegate the “Surrendercrats,” defeatists, and appeasement artists to the ash heap of history. The liberal democrats have been making the Vietnam metaphors and comparisons since day one of this war, and they have proven to right on one major similarity: the will of the politicians and the will of the American people will determine the outcome of this war as it did in Vietnam. The United States must never again lose the will to win a war that must be won. And unlike Howard Dean, the Republicans and George Bush see that the war can and will be won no matter what the cost in resources and manpower.

Michelle Malkin
has great coverage on the day after the election.
Stop The ACLU has wonderful coverage on McCain's Al Quada "Bill of Rights."
Bryan Preston at the Junk Yard Blog elaborates on a comparison of war heros.
The Mudville Gazette exposes the ridiculous coverage of the MSM regarding yesterday's election.

A Cold Snowy Night, Perfect for Russian Tea




It is a cold, snowy night, and perfect for Russian Tea. This recipe was given to me by a college professor from Anderson University, and it is perfect for all of the holidays. This fabulous, hot drink works well after dinner and with dessert. I hope you make some and enjoy! The pictures are from the Manhattan Macy's Holiday Windows, Christmas, 2004.

Russian Tea

Make a pitcher of Iced Tea (about a quart)
Add one can of orange juice concentrate (10 ounces)
Mix these two liquids in a dutch oven or crock pot, add two cans of water.
Add 2/3 cup of sugar, 2-3 cinnamon sticks, a teaspoon of whole cloves, and a teaspoon of whole all-spice.

Simmer the minture until it boils. Turn down immediately and simmer for another 15-20 minutes. It's ready to drink.

The recipe is easily doubled for a crowd. I have made as many as five recipes for a large party. It will make a wonderful aroma throughout your house. The Russian Tea can be refridgerated and reheated easily by the cup in the microwave oven.

This is one of the finest hot beverages I have ever enjoyed.

Altio is No Scalia

By Christopher Ryan Caudill
Edited by Thespis

The sovereign tertiary structure of the United States federal government is an exceptional configuration, and has become a model for democracies across the globe. These three distinct and independent branches of government provide the basis of an elegant and streamlined sonata in which a discordant cacophony of voices and cultures function together as one society forming one nation under God: the United States of America. As one of the co-equal branches of the federal government, the Supreme Court has likely evolved beyond the original intent of the founding fathers when compared with the executive and legislative branches. The court has greatly expanded its role in the course of our nation’s history, which has brought rise to many controversial debates between politically operated coalitions. In his book Men In Black, author and Supreme Court expert Mark Levin details the mounting role of the U. S. Supreme Court since the constitution was ratified in 1789. Mr. Levin brings the entire scope of the situation into focus in chapter one of his New York Times best-seller: “America’s founding fathers had a clear and profound vision for what they wanted our federal government to be. The overarching purpose was to prevent the concentration of power in a relative handful of institutions and individuals.” Mr. Levin goes on to argue that today’s Supreme Court has enacted a “judicial reign of tyranny” upon the American people. Controversy surrounding the role and function of the Supreme Court came into sharp focus when the court ruled on the most infamous case of modern times: Roe versus Wade in 1973. This controversial decision has impacted every Presidential election since that time. This national political debate has been infused with white-hot rhetoric from conservative and liberal groups at all levels of government, but the Presidential election of 1980 brought the role of a President in Supreme Court appointments into the magnified debate of the twenty-first century. Since that time, a spotlight has shown on every Presidential candidate as his judicial philosophy and Supreme Court appointments became essential to campaign strategies and tactics. (Coulter, p.201) In the 2000 and 2004 campaigns, President Bush brought a new laser-like focus to the issue by repeatedly stating that he would name judges in the tradition of Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas. With his most recent appointment of Judge Samuel Alito to fill the seat of retiring Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, President George W. Bush has renewed the national debate over judicial philosophies and conservative jurisprudence. Further, in an unmitigated act of disingenuous remarks and partial reporting, the mainstream media immediately began to promote the idea that Judge Alito was the judicial replica of Justice Scalia. Why is this nomination such a hot issue? The answer, simply stated, is that after the announcement of nomination the mainstream media immediately began to promote the idea that Judge Alito was the judicial replica of Justice Scalia by calling Judge Alito by the nickname “Scalito.” A clever ploy and satirical pun, the nickname took flight and the mainstream media infused the plotline with an easily understood yet grossly unsupported statement. Although there are similarities between Justice Scalia and Judge Alito, the unfair depiction of Alito as “Scalito” does not withstand the test of comparative judicial opinion, and the repetitive use of the name Scalito represents nothing more than the trite thinking of the media elite.
The one publicly known thing about Samuel Alito, his crass nickname “Scalito,” is grounded in a superficial comparison of the two legal experts, however a further examination of the data surrounding this simplistic comparison demonstrates the differences between the two men. Both Scalia and Alito are Italian American men who are conservative. They are both known for writing sound and well thought out opposing opinions in courts that have been dominated by liberals. Both of these men were appointed by Republican Presidents to their original judicial posts, Scalia by President Reagan to the District of Columbia U.S. Court of Appeals, and Alito by President George Herbert Walker Bush to the third federal circuit court of appeals in 1990. Alito received his appointment after being a fixture in the Reagan administration during the 1980’s. While all of these comparisons are self evident and factual, only the dullest of minds engaging in the shallowest of judgments can create additional similarities between the two men. Anything beyond a cursory examination demonstrates fissures in the supposed union of these two judicial scholars.
In 2002 Justice Scalia wrote a stinging rebuke of one of Alito’s decisions, and eventually had Alito’s decision overturned at the Supreme Court level, one of the many differences between the two men. The case surrounded a woman trying to secure her social security disability benefits when her job as an elevator operator was eliminated. The plaintiff, Pauline Thomas, was truly disabled. Alito argued the case fervently with his fellow judges and convinced them to overturn the lower court’s ruling denying Ms. Thomas the benefits. The Supreme Court however, remained unmoved by Judge Alito’s interpretation. In fact, Antonin Scalia, who was a member of the Supreme Court overseeing the trial, stated that Judge Alito had disregarded the fundamental rules for interpreting the law and called the thinking, “absurd.” Ms. Huang, a former clerk of Samuel Alito’s, states the following of Judge Alito, and his views of this case. “I think he really looks at the facts of the case; he'd be very realistic. He's not going to be carried away by some legal doctrine or some arcane grammatical rule.” This legal disagreement between the two men serves as an illustration for the career differences of Sam Alito and Justice Scalia, giving Alito a distinctive judicial presence of his own: free of the nickname “Scalito.”
Further evidence of the differences between Scalia and Alito exists in the judicial opinions of Judge Alito. Alito’s decisions reflect his affinity for a particular brand of conservatism often called libertarianism. A mainstream libertarian will always focus on the reality that the intention of the United States Constitution is to limit the power of the federal government. According to Ilya Soman writing in The American Spectator, it is in this arena that Alito’s divergence from Scalia is the most obvious. In a striking departure from Justice Scalia, Alito has repeatedly voted for the free exercise rights of minority religious groups even if the laws in question do not intentionally or directly harm the religious group. Soman provides an instructive summary of the following case.
"In Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Newark (1999), he joined an opinion holding that Muslim police officers had a right to grow beards (as required by their religion) so long as the city allowed a secular health-related exemption from its no-beard policy. This result is in tension with Scalia's position in the important case of Employment Division v. Smith, where he wrote a decision holding that the Constitution in most cases does not protect religious groups against the effects of "neutral" laws. Given that the FOP case involved Muslims, it is hard to argue that Alito was just voting for the rights of a group whose religious values he shares. In another case, Blackhawk v. Pennsylvania, Alito authored an opinion establishing a free exercise exemption for a Native American religious group. While these Alito decisions do not directly contradict Smith, they certainly provide much stronger protections for minority religious groups than Scalia would be likely to favor. "
Clearly, Alito is a self-regulating jurist of noteworthy disparity with Justice Scalia.

The issue of federalism provides another point of distinction between Scalia and Alito. In a 1996 case involving the possession of machine guns across state lines, Alito dissented from a majority opinion sustaining the federal interference into this matter. Alito did not make his dissent based upon a personal belief regarding the rights of gun owners. In fact, Judge Alito goes to some length in the dissent to speak favorably of state’s being permitted to regulate machine gun ownership. Alito’s tapered reasoning involved the rejection of any federal law or by default, judicial fiat, as a method of regulating gun ownership as intrastate commerce. This case went one step beyond Judge Alito’s libertarian judicial philosophy and stands in contradistinction to Justice Scalia’s ruling that the breadth of the commerce clause allows for the interstate restrictions and a federal ban on the possession of marijuana. In the case of Gonzales vs. Raich, Scalia gives a much broader definition to the interpretation of commerce clause and took the unusual step for any conservative jurist of overriding state laws making marijuana legal. Alito’s other notable cases involve permitting free speech from being restricted simply because groups of individuals may classify the protected speech as harassment of one group. As with any practicing libertarian, Alito sides with the limited original intent of the language in the constitution and focuses on the liberty of the individual.
Another reality of this subject matter is that the media attacks on Alito have little or nothing to do with the comparison of Scalia and Alito. As if following the compulsory cue from the left-wing pressure groups, the hysteria of the mainstream media regarding the nomination of Judge Sam Alito appears to have been in a constant crescendo. The penultimate moment of the crescendo came during the Friday, December 2 edition of the CNN program, The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer, which featured reports highlighting Judge Alito's supposed position on abortion, and new documents alleged to have been found. (Blitzer, p.1) All of this so-called news appears to be part of a larger strategy to defeat Alito's nomination through a prolonged and co-coordinated attack designed to permeate the public perception of Mr. Alito. The long, slow, and steady drip of left wing propaganda aimed at Judge Alito appears to be a train moving at full throttle. Two innocuous memos written by Judge Alito in 1985 are the current documents causing the outcry from Alito’s opposition. One of the memos should give great power and confidence to conservatives. In this memo, a unique brand of a job application, Sam Alito writes his philosophy of government for the United States. Mr. Alito’s words in the opening of this memo are a statement of bold, uninhibited conservatism. He embraces the common sense conservative ideals of the last fifty years. These words, largely unreported, would have a wide appeal across Middle America, and demonstrate the practicality of Judge Alito.

I am, and have always been a conservative and an adherent to the same philosophical views that I believe are central to this administration. It is obviously very difficult to summarize a set of political views in a sentence, but in capsule form, I believe very strongly in limited government, federalism, free enterprise, the supremacy of the elected branches of government, the need for a strong national defense and effective law enforcement, and the legitimacy of a government role in protecting traditional values. In the field of law, I disagree strenuously with the usurpation by the judiciary of decision-making authority that should be exercised by the branches of government responsibleto the electorate. When I first became interested in government and politics during the 1960’s, the greatest influenceson my views were the writings of William F. Buckley, Jr., in The National Review, and Barry Goldwater’s 1964 campaign. In college, I developed a deep interest in constitutional law, motivated in large part by disagreement with Warren Court decisions, particularly in the areas of criminal procedure,the Establishment Clause, and reapportionment.

This statement on his job application simply states Alito’s judicial philosophy. Those opposing Alito are chastising his philosophy because it may not coincide with their views of the subject. In many instances, comparisons of Alito and Scalia cannot be used as a diminutive device that would bring educated people to oppose Alito; which is just another item that proves Alito is an individual and not a judicial replica of Justice Antonin Scalia.
There is another memo exploited by the press which deals with a 1985 abortion case. Exaggerated claims and raucous rhetoric are emanating forth from the opposition relative to this memo because it addresses the liberal litmus test, the solitary issue for which they and their extremist supporters focus on for Supreme Court appointments: legalized abortion. Interestingly, this memo was not the result of a Bush administration release. The memo came from the National archives were the Clinton Administration had dumped it some years ago. Brian Maguire of the New York Sun speculates that the documents were released by the Clinton administration as a preemptive strike against any potential Republican appointee for the Supreme Court. The memo reveals that as a lawyer in the Reagan justice department, Alito argued for chipping away at abortion rights as a strategy for reforming this flawed judicial precedent. Alito’s argument was consistent with the stated policy of Ronald Reagan and the Reagan justice department. The defective 1973 decision which has been so widely debated since that time, made all policy choices about abortion matters of constitutional law. The court removed the issue from the electoral process. All conservatives have believed before and after Roe that the issue should be settled through the political process since obviously the constitution does not explicitly address abortion, or the contrived right to privacy upon which the court based the original decision. While the liberals and the mainstream media dwell upon the necessity of upholding the considerably blemished and poorly reasoned decision of Roe versus Wade, there are other great issues of significance before the court today, and there will doubtless be immense issues to be decided by the court in the future. Even Paul Begala the notorious prince of the strident liberals, said it is not advisable for the democrats in the senate to “act as if the Supreme Court is the abortion court.” The normally frantic Begala insisted that Alito has withheld critical information from the committee, while saying that Senator Kennedy is “smarter than the average bear” and that Senator Kennedy and others will succeed in discrediting Sam Alito by using a range of issues to frame his lack of suitability for the court.

Only time will tell what comes of this scorching issue. Will Alito get the job? Regardless of the strategy employed by the left, Judge Alito is still very likely to be confirmed. The Republican majority in the senate is counting on at least fifty of their fifty-five votes. The liberals in the senate are likely to increase the volume and intensity of their speechifying in the weeks ahead. Having failed in their harsh criticism of President Bush on the Iraq war, these shrill opponents of Judge Alito’s nomination will stop at nothing to smear Judge Alito and deny him the opportunity to serve as a member of the Untied States Supreme Court as a singular justice, and not as a so-called replica of Antonin Scalia.

Carol Burnett in Once Upon A Mattress: On TV!

UPDATE: The New York Times has a wonderful artilce on the movie today.
There is also a wonderful preview in The New York Daily News.
The USA Today also has an interesting article. The author fails to understand that the role of Queen Aggravain was always the largest role in the show and is therefore a perfect role for Ms. Burnett at age 72.
The made for TV Movie of the Mary Rodgers musical ONCE UPON A MATTRESS will air this Sunday night at 7:00pm. on the ABC Television network. ONCE UPON A MATTRESS has long been a personal favorite of Broadway musicals as I remember it being on television (in black and white) with Carol Burnett as Winnifred the Princess in the story of The Princess and The Pea. Subsequently, I portrayed the character of the minstrel in the Anderson University Production in 1983. None of the two earlier telecast versions are avialable in any format today, so this remake of the classic production will be a welcome addition to the theater archive. Further, it is hoped that with Carol Burnett as the central force behind this production, the integrity of the libretto and score with its' original intent should be intact. The original 1959 production propelled Ms. Burnett into international stardom and her wildly popular television series in the 1960's and 1970's.

ABC Media has a smorgasboard of information about the made for television movie. There are great photographs, detailed biographies, and long lead story on the movie.

This Playbill article
tells casting information (released more than sixteen months ago) including information about Matthew Morrison who portrays Sir Harry in this production.
This is a Playbill article on Dennis O'Hare who stars in the movie as Prince Dauntless. His work on Broadway in Take Me Out, and in Sweet Charity earned him great acclaim.

This is a fascinating column
quoting Mary Rodgers the day after the 1996 Broadway Revival closed after playing only six months at the Broadhurst Theater. Additionally, Mary Rodgers speaks of her lyricist, Marshall Barer following his death in September 1998.

Theater Mania
provides us with a glimpse of the Museum of Radio and Television at 52nd Street and Fifth Avenue on Manhattan showing of the 1964 made for televsion Once Upon A Mattress.

The Movie Trailer is avaiable at The New York Times.


The Latest Liberal Strategy for Victory

It seems that the liberals have a new strategy for winning the war on terror: defeat the renewal of the Patriot Act. It is difficult to believe that four years after 9-11, 2oo1, our elected officials have forgotten the urgency of keeping all our citizens safe. I have yet to read of one example of the patriot act being utilized offensively.

It is also amazing that a bill which passed with 251 bi-partisan votes in the house could be filibustered in the senate. Harry Reid has endorsed the filibutser, and this action demonstrates the lack of perception on the part of Russ Feingold, Reid, and Chuck Schumer. Let's not forget Senator Chuck Hagel (R-Nebraska) who has once again sided with the liberals in a major national security issue.

Two outspoken house members clearly believe in the validity of the Patriot Act, and have defended its' passage. James Sensenbrenner, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committe has stated, "The consequence of the Patriot Act expiring on December 31st is going to be putting the American people at greater risk." "The reauthorization of the Patriot Act is important to the security of this country" states Tom Tancredo the maverick conservative representative from Colorado.

Moreover, Democrat Senators appear to be continuing their previous strategy of forcasting defeat in Iraq. Bill Kristol of The Weekly Standard states that these politicans are "crazy" for hoping for defeat. As a nation, we always hope to win, and the United States has a long and rich history of winning wars with great national will at home.

You can see more liberal, defeatist logic at The Political Teen. Also, check out more great information on the defeatist party at the Mudville Gazette.

Friday, December 09, 2005

Christmas Day on Sunday

Several articles were published today confirming that some Evangelical Mega-Churches will not be having services on Sunday, December 25, 2005 due to Christmas Day falling on a Sunday. Where's the outrage over this spiritual fauz paus? Well, we can find it at the anchoress, and it is implicit in this article in the New York Times.

The anchoress brings her catholic perspective to the situation, and as I explained to a friend the other day, most Catholics have services on Christmas Day each year. The point is that a worship service is held and the opportunity is available for all those wishing to worship on Chritmas Day. For those who want to shut out all things secular and to focus for a few minutes on the deep sacred meaning of these winter days, Christmas Day worship is a priority.

It doesn't make anyone any less Christian for not attending services due to family committments, other plans, or a personal choice. However, the integrity of the church is at stake when we allow anything beyond a natural disaster to cancle worship services.

This latest decision to forego Christmas Day worship confirms that the mega-churches have allowed themselves to become an arm of secular society. By playing and singing all of their popular music (sometimes with secular texts and meanings) and serving as apologists for the gospel, these churches have lost the significant meaning of most religious holidays. The music that they call "contemporary christian" is nothing more than recycled pop sound sometimes with videos that can compete with Britney Spears.

For many of these mega-churches, the fourth of July is a larger "holiday" than Christmas or Easter. A quick google search reveals many articles on resplident services "celebrating" the fourth of July as a part of the liturgical year. It seems that some churches have turned the spiritual world upside down.

More later.......but until then remember the words of this famous carol:

I heard the Bells on Christmas Day
Their old familiar carols play
And wild and sweet the words repeat
Of pease on earth, good will to men.

Ann Coulter: What You May Not Have Heard


Some of you know that I am huge fan of Ann Coulter. Her New York Times best selling books, Treason, Slander, and High Crimes and Misdemeanors are fabulous books!

While a lot of information has been in the news relative to the speech Ann Coulter attempted to give at The Univeristy of Connecticut on Wednesday night, you have to read this article to get the whole story. As is the case with many other stories, the print media gives us more of the story than anyone else.

Ian Schwartz also has some great coverage of Ann over at The Political Teen.

You can find Ann's latest column here. As always, it is wonderful.

This is a great article on Ann's speech in Arizona in October, 2004 when she almost got a pie in the face.

Read the outstanding coverage of Ann's speech at Kansas State in March 2005.

There are some great Quick Hits at The Political Teen today. Also, check out his video of Ann's problems at UConn.


Tuesday, December 06, 2005

Ten Stupid Things Said by Liberals-In Just Three Days!

Have you noticed that it has been a remarkable week already? The democrats have left me speechless. It is only Wednesday (Tuesday night, December 6 as I write this post) and the democrats and liberals have had quite a stupid week already! WOW! They exhaust me with their snobbery, theoretical intellectual superiority, and inclination to hold forth on a range of topics from Iraq to Governor Blanco, and from Cindy Sheehan to John Kerry. This special edition of a Sunday link fest on Wednesday is my tribute to the amazingly stupid things that liberals can say in the course of just two days.

On the CNN Program The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer, Ramsey Clark, Jimmy Carter’s Attorney General stated that President Bush should be impeached for the “high crime and misdemeanor” of leading an illegal war of aggression. Mr. Clark described Saddaam Hussein as calm and reflective, and reported to Wolf that Saddam is much the same person as when Clark tried to appease Saddaam prior to the 1991 Gulf War.

Unfortunately for everyone, Jack Murtha is still a daily blowhard in the news media sharing his inane view of an immediate redeployment (also understood as an immediate withdraw in the real world) of troops. While Murtha sounds off trying to explain away his debacle of two weeks ago (the one voted down by over 400 votes in the House) even Katie Couric is having difficulty understanding Mr. Murtha’s position.

We knew we could depend on Howard Dean to keep the fringe leftists in the public eye when he became the chief national spokesperson for the democrat party. On Monday, Dean said, "The idea that the United States is going to win the war in Iraq is just plain wrong.” A Firestorm of criticism was set off in the media, and one could just see the crowd from MoveOn.org applauding with a standing ovation.

Also, read Michelle Malkin, Powerline, and the great Captain Ed at Captain's Quarters.

Several witnesses before the House Committee, which is investigating the response of the federal government to the Katrina Disaster, stated that they saw and heard the bombs that blew up the levies in New Orleans. Yes, these statements full of elaborate descriptions were really made in the halls of our congress, and given the credibility and standing that is inherent in testimony given before the United States congress.

John Kerry kicked off the week commenting that our soldiers are terrorists, and that this terrorism should be “done by Iraqis.” I am thankful for the coverage by Bryan Preston at JunkYard Blog, and to Rush Limbaugh for placing Senator Kerry’s comments in perspective. It was also refreshing to see John O’Neill back on Fox News again exposing Senator Kerry’s hypocrisy on all military matters.

Cindy Sheehan was given time on the Blitzer show today too. She calls President Bush “George” and sides with Murtha’s position which she calls an immediate withdrawal of troops.

It is great that we have Governor Blanco to kick around still. As more evidence comes to light about her total lack of competence, she reveals herself to be the most stuck on stupid person in the democrat party. Once again, Bryan Preston has not to be missed coverage of this issue. Bryan summarizes the matter in this manner, “Blanco was more concerned with appearance than facts; it was obvious as the disaster progressed that Blanco was not in fact in charge of any response. She encouraged looting and stood in the way of needed aid to those stranded in New Orleans. Taken together, she knew she had failed and therefore sought to spin the disaster back on Bush to deflect the political fallout from herself. Blanco lied, people died.” Bryan goes on with his strongest statement to date implicating Blanco in her own unmitigated disaster.
“The more I think about this, the more of a smoking gun I think it is. Blanco had her top personnel working not on storm relief, but on political relief. Rather than working strategies to get food and transportation lined up, they were lining up an air war against President Bush. Her actions are beyond criminal, and her decisions are beyond appalling. What we see in the Blanco communications is an attitude in which saving herself from political fallout took precedence over saving stranded people from floodwaters.
Now that we know this, it’s incumbent on all bloggers who have spent any time on Katrina to talk about this. The press will let Blanco off the hook if we let them. If she gets away with politicizing Katrina, she may be getting away with negligent homicide. At the very least, she’ll be getting away with a grotesque lie that has massively distorted the American people’s view of the storm and its aftermath. Her lie may well have profound consequences on the way we respond to storms in the future.”

The anti-war left has a great strategy: hound Hillary Clinton until she joins their non-stop effort to end the war

Lowell Weicker, erstwhile former Governor of Connecticut wants to see Joe Lieberman face a challenge in his upcoming 2006 race for re-election to the senate. Here’s the precise stupid thing said by Weicker, “"I have seen this country propagandized into war," said Weicker, a Republican-turned-independent. "It's now a second wave of propagandizing, with the president taking the stump, joined by persons like Senator Joe Lieberman." Weicker seems to imply that treasonous, partisan remarks are more important than the strong military position of the United States. "The nation does not need a Democrat to second the president's policy." I guess Weicker is right, it is too much to expect the politicians to unite when the nation is at war.

Although it is difficult to select a winner, Bob Beckel, who managed the forty-nine state loss by Walter Mondale in 1984, has this amazing quote, “I don't know any democrat that called George Bush a liar.” Obviously Beckel needs a refresher.

If this is any indication, this weekend’s Sunday Link Fest, should I get the time to produce that post, should be a great one.

Murtha made it worse today. Check out this coverage over at the political Teen.

Read all about it at Stop The ACLU

Read what Betsy Newmark
is saying on Betsy's Page. She is on the mark again!

Update II: An Open Letter To Michelle Malkin

WOW! A cacophony of vociferous voices opposed to any defense of public education has challenged my latest post at Red State. The well-orchestrated alliance against the public schools will stop at nothing in their attempt to discredit the value and advantage of a strong system of public education, and they are all singing the same tune! I have been informed that I “do not understand the issue,” and that I have misrepresented nearly every facet of this complex and critical issue. As a life long conservative that has worked diligently for the election of numerous local, state, and national Republican candidates, it is dismaying to have well thought commentary derived from primary sources dismissed as “talking points.” In all, these self ordained pundits deliver their “message” in a cloud of rhetorical smoke characterized by an ambiance of unmitigated negativity and pessimism. These frenzied voices dismiss any writing or suggestion that does not fit the narrowly defined paradigm of anti-public school drivel to which they have become accustomed in their artificial bubble of unreality. It would be interesting to note if all these critics of public education have even stepped a foot inside any public school in the last ten years.

Although it is gratifying to have initiated a worthwhile and extended set of comments, the original point of my “Open Letter to Michelle Malkin” has been lost. The random attempt by many conservatives (not all) to portray today’s public education as worthless continues unmonitored and is too often unanswered. One or two isolated examples do not make an effective case against the entirety of public education. It is unfortunate that many of those commenting on the article engage in personal attacks instead of engaging in an honest conversation about the education of our children. This natural propensity to offer critiques while avoiding any real plans for our educational system reflect the sorely lacking stance of many Republican elected officials. If these harsh critics have concrete designs that include an educational model for all children, let them come forward and enjoin this battle in the arena of ideas.

Several comments by “strieff” are lacking in substance and quite easily challenged. Here is a wonderful example:
“The conservative critque of public schools is not "shut them down." That is just a profoundly stupid and grotesquely dishonest statement. The critique is twofold. First, education is a state and local responsibility and the federal government should butt out. Second, a free public education is a different concept from a system of public schools. So in your mythical vote you should at least discuss the issue at hand not some bogus position you pulled out of a bodily orifice.”

By continually depleting funds from the public education system, mandating that public schools must subject their students to an endless battery of high stakes tests, and by creating a system of mismanaged, inexplicable, and unaccountable charter schools, conservatives in the state of Ohio are trying desperately to starve the public schools and institute a “pay to play” system of public education which does not provide a fair and equitable education for ALL students. The original statement stands: Conservatives in Ohio want to dismantle and eliminate public schools. Politicians that I have helped elect have told me this privately, but they know that the public is not ready for this solution! Certainly, I agree: Public Schools are a state and local responsibility! The federal government-especially and most recently under President Bush-has assumed a large role in the funding of public education, and countless layers of red tape and unfounded mandates. The idea of having Senators, Congressmen, and state legislators vote on the validity of public education would be the same strategy that the Republicans used to expose Jack Murtha’s and Nancy Pelosi’s patent dishonesty about Iraq. If conservatives truly believe in public education, let them vote at the state level for fair, equitable, stable, and adequate resources to make public education work. As you know from reading my previous articles, accountability measures should be attached to funding, and the mutually dependent relationships of resources to success should be fully explored. Unless my brain qualifies under your twisted and narrow definition of a “bodily orifice” you have not only failed in your personal attack, but also engaged in particularly derisive brand of hyperbole.

Strieff also challenges our ability to serve as mentors, role models, and motivational experts. This unlikely selection for an area of disagreement is puzzling to me. Parents, Administrators, and all segments of the media constantly challenge teachers to serve as appropriate role models. We aspire to show a meaningful life with a strong value on life-long learning to all of our students. The teachers in our district (about 350) could fill several books with testimonials of students who were inspired by our teaching and became better people as a result of their interaction with professional educators. The guiding and professional direction of a caring, competent, and engaged teacher can facilitate a life changing pattern for an individual student. You might ask a room full of people to name a favorite teacher and memorable moment. Undoubtedly, you will find many friends and colleagues that have wonderful memories of a favorite teacher, and likely you will find people relating stories of life lessons learned from teachers in public and private schools. Your apparent effort to diminish the role and impact of a teacher upon on a child simply doesn’t pass the “smell” test.


In a response to my statement that home schooled students miss out on many educational and enriching opportunities, streiff explodes with the following angry outburst full of distortion. His statement is a caricature of the typical opponent of public schools.
"Were any of this true, and I hasten to emphasize I doubt that you can find one whit of evidence to indicate a "world famous choir" or "athletic team" or much of this other stuff is really a prerequisite to, rather than a distraction from, a well rounded education, there is still not one single reason that it should or must be administered through a public school system. I'm sure this rant made you feel better. And it's always easier debating people, after the fact and through a diary, than engaging them in the conversation you were absent from. It is also juvenile. "

The ringing truth of my original statement has never been more resonant, and any educator at heart would inherently know the intangible value of strong curricular and co-curricular programs. No one, especially me, ever asserted that these programs were a “prerequisite.” They are not “pre” anything. These programs, long endorsed and supported by patriotic, educated, and enlightened Americans go hand in hand with a strong academic program at nearly all public and private schools. Only a self-absorbed, inflexible, and egotistical fanatic whose intellect is aloft at the celestial altitudes of some home schooled ivory tower could challenge the universally accepted practice of having strong performing arts curriculum, competitive athletic teams, and a strong compliment of academic enrichment programs as a part of any academic community. There are many great choirs in Ohio alone that are nationally and internationally recognized, not to mention the Eastern High School Choir from Washington D.C. which is internationally known and represents the best in public education. The athletic teams, marching bands, and musical and play productions from Ohio’s system of public education are unmatched as judged by the Ohio High School Athletic Association, the Ohio Music Education Association, and by the Educational Theater Alliance in Ohio. Each of these highly reputable and democratic professional organizations have juried competitions and competitive events with guidelines established by standards boards that employ a broad spectrum of rubrics and assessments to evaluate these highly valued and exceptional programs. In these areas, public schools soar above any private or charter school systems.

In addition, let us compare apples to apples in comparing the academic achievements of students in all school systems. Let’s compare several students from several schools with two parents at home who are engaged in rearing the students. Let us compare and contrast the portfolio assessments of students whose parents have a middle class income. Let us compare the students who have one parent or no parent, or who are never fed properly at home, or who may be lacking in appropriate health care. Let us use a rubric or assessment measurement that quantifies the value of an involved parent or two, or put all of these requisite factors into the overused and confusing set of propaganda that is so often misused to bash the public schools. And since when it is juvenile to respond to comments by constructing an original post knowing that others in the opposition will continue to post their thoughts too? Isn’t all of this part of the dialogue permitted by our system of free speech and promoted in the blogosphere as we all pontificate on our own topics and well-developed views? If strieff has constructed and artificial set of blogging rules, or if I missed the Emily Post edition of blogging etiquette, please inform me. Otherwise, I will continue to produce original posts that express well-reasoned views which I hope might generate more original critiques than simply calling them stupid.


Sunday, December 04, 2005

Worth Reading This Sunday

Bob Novak had a column on Saturday regarding ethics issues with members of the US House of Representatives. In particular he brings forth the possible problems of Ohio's Bob Ney. This is a topic for which I have much longer post underway.

I love this article by Bil Sammon on the democrats in disarray over the position on the Iraq War. Not only is Mr. Sammon one of my favorites, he does his usual exellent job in this reporting.

According to Michael Goodwin, this is what Hillary Clinton should have said to her supporters this week in place of that muddled email message that was sent out in her name.

I love this post at The Junk Year Blog. Once again, he exposes Governor Blanco for the fool that she is!

Lierberman versus Murtha Explained
is a great post at Powerline.

Friday, December 02, 2005

Update: An Open Letter to Michelle Malkin

Finally, I may have generated some debate about the topic of public schools within the conservative blogosphere with my post of last weekend, “An Open Letter to Michelle Malkin.” I have not yet heard from Ms. Malkin, but I have received many comments on all sides from around the Internet. As usual, the home-schoolers are the most defensive, but I welcome their contribution to this debate. Some of the comments posted on thespis journal, on email messages, or the many comments over at the Red State Diary are contained within this post, along with my response.

Recently, I was discussing this issue with strongly conservative friend. I pointed out the lack of intellectual honesty in the debate regarding public education. If the Republican House leadership (or the democrats for that matter) were to put up a "Murtha" style resolution stating that the US House of Representatives recommends the closing of all public schools beginning immediately, the the resolution would get about as many votes as the Murtha bill received: three or four votes. The same would be true in the Ohio legislature. While significant time is invested in criticizing teachers and students, there is not one comprehensive plan to provide a fair and equitable education for all. Nearly every half-baked solution that is suggested is nothing more than "leave any child behind" in favor of the privileged and prosperous.

In researching some information about the wonderful nominee for Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Samuel Alito, I found that his bedrock conservative values includes, "the legitimacy of a government role in protecting traditional values." Public education is certainly one of our nation's most treasured, tried and true values affirmed daily in classrooms across the nation. Judge Alito has also advocated the role of the conservative judge in protecting the innocent, and public education: free and equitable for all- is certainly most beneficial to the children who need the instruction, socialization, and basic life skills afforded in most every public school in every state in America.

Most voices in the conservative movement, including most of the bloggers, randomly attack the public schools without specific information, and without engaging in a credible discussion about the largely successful suburban and rural public schools across the nation. It is much easier and more palatable to fool the tax-weary public on the idea of a failed public school model, and join the coalition of media outlets which regularly bash public education in random and often undocumented ways. When Michelle Malkin posts an outrageous example of one public school teacher's behavior, all of the people pre-disposed to despise public education recite in unison, "this is one more reason why we home school."


Blogger Steve Walden responded to the open letter in this manner: "Whenever you group children in a class, certain behaviors emerge, such as bullying and cliques. This happens in private schools just as easily as in public schools. It can be reined in somewhat, but there is no way to eliminate it completely.Rather than put my kids in a pool where they all have to plug along in their education at the speed of average or, worse, the speed of the slowest learner, my wife and I make the sacrifice of home schooling our children. My daughter is a year ahead of her peers and all of our children receive comments from adults who say they are well mannered, respectful and delightful. We are seeing great rewards from home schooling and the idea of sticking our children in any school, public or private, is reprehensible."

Dear Mr. Walden: I admire your efforts to educate your children at home. Thankfully, you and your wife are committed parents, educators, and role models for your children.
Many parents of the students that I work with won't even come to school for conference, or talk on the telephone regarding their child. They also don't provide a winter coat for their child, and tell the child to figure out dinner plans for themselves. They won't attend any school events or come to watch their child in the school play. When we offer tutoring, and other special programs, the student has no ride home. In fact, many of these parents are happy when their child stays home several days in a row to baby-sit the other children in the family, so they (the parent) won't have to get up off of the sofa to watch the other children themselves. We work with all of the other children who have a parent or guardian who cares, and we all strive together for the benefit of the child. It's amazing! These students are tremendously successful. We have sent many of the students on to educational endeavors at the finest schools in the nation. Even some of the students who have no home support at all have been highly successful at our high school and continued in their education by pursuing college degrees at great schools across the nation. We, the public school teachers, served as the mentors, role models, and motivational experts, and served as the turning point in the lives of these students as we carry forth with our ministry of education and caring in the public schools.

Over at Red State, Hoosier Teacher made the following comment: "How do the statements about the goodness and capability of public school teachers have any bearing on the argument of whether the government should be in the business of educating children?"


Dear Hoosier Teacher: I am a conservative at heart, but tell me, where would the resources for a quality school program for ALL children come from if not from the government? A proper education for all is one of the core values of our American culture. The government is the only appropriate source of funding in today's world if we wish to meet the goal of educating everyone. As a culture, we demonstrate our value on people by the amount of their paycheck. Are you suggesting that teacher's are over paid?

Also at Red State The Sophist says, "The responsibility of educating children belongs to their parents and their families, not to teachers."

To The Sophist I say, "Right On!" Professional Educators can work best and provide the best opportunities for students while stretching and challenging the students when parents and teachers work together. In his comments, the Sophist elaborates upon the collapse of the family, and the failure of liberal policies to fix these complex problems. Again, I agree very strongly. None of this challenges the ability of a strong public school to get the job done the best.


Jake Jacobson asks this question, "How would you respond to the endless polls that show the teaching profession overwhelmingly staffed by liberals? In fact liberals of a rather extreme stripe?"


There are many liberals in the classroom; however, I must once again make the distinction between the urban school districts and suburban or rural districts. There are many of us conservatives out there, and we are teaching our students the basic curriculum. There is not bias in everything. Many of us are fair and balanced, and we certainly have no reason to engage a political debate every day.

One final note: home school can NEVER provide all of the necessary laboratory sciences, language experts, performing and visual arts specialists, and home schooling can never provide an athletic team, a world famous choir, a competitive gifted and talented program, or all of the other components of a quality, well-rounded educational program necessary for success in today's world. As a product of the public schools, I am proud of the achievements of all of our students. Despite this organized effort to discredit public education, great things happen every day in the public schools.


















THE COLOR PURPLE Makes its' Broadway Debut



Thursday, December 1 was a huge night for the 2006 Broadway season with the opening of The Color Purple at The Broadway Theater. Oprah Winfrey made the night even more festive with her appearance on the David Letterman show at the Ed Sullivan Theater in the same block of Broadway bewteen 52nd and 53rd Streets on Broadway last night.

In The New York Times, Ben Brantley describes a Broadway production that is off to the races with "pages flying off of the calendar as the years fly by." ".............So much story and so many years to be covered in less than three hours on Broadway." It is difficult to tell if Mr. Brantley truly liked the show or not.

As always, Clive Barnes in The New York Post is more direct and helpful in his analysis.

Read Howard Kissel in The New York Daily News. Mr Kissel states in his review, "The cast's high spirits give the show great energy and joy, but it never seems more than a mechanically devised entertainment. It doesn't really convey the sadness or the strength of the experience it tries to capture." OUCH!

Here is a fascinating article in the New York Daily News about David Letterman and Oprah Winfrey. It would have been thrilling to see these two walk to the theater for the opening of The Color Purple.

Broadway.com
has its' usual comprehensive summary of reviews. This is very useful! The coverage at Playbill.com is also amazing!

I will look forward to hopefully seeing this show in New York very soon.


Alito Returns to the News

As if following the compulsory cue from the left-wing pressure groups, the hysteria of the mainstream media regarding the nomination of Judge Sam Alito appears to have made a deliberate crescendo this week. The penultimate moment of the crescendo came during Friday’s CNN program, The Situation Room with Wolf Blitzer, which featured reports highlighting Judge Alito’s supposed position on abortion, and new documents alleged to have been “found” this week. All of this so-called news appears to be part of a larger strategy to defeat Alito’s nomination through a prolonged and co-coordinated attack designed to permeate the public perception of Mr. Altio. The long, slow, and steady drip of left wing propaganda aimed at Judge Alito appears to be a train moving at full throttle.

Two innocuous memos written by Judge Alito in 1985 are the current documents causing the outcry from Senator Kennedy, Senator Schumer and others. One of the memos should give great power and confidence to conservatives. In this memo, a unique brand of a job application, Sam Alito writes his philosophy of government for the United States. Mr. Altio’s words in the opening of this memo are a statement of bold, uninhibited conservatism. He embraces the common sense conservative ideals of the last fifty years. These words, largely unreported, would have a wide appeal across Middle America, and demonstrate the practicality of Judge Alito.

"I am, and have always been a conservative and an adherent to the same philosophical views that I believe are central to this administration. It is obviously very difficult to summarize a set of political views in a sentence, but in capsule form, I believe very strongly in limited government, federalism, free enterprise, the supremacy of the elected branches of government, the need for a strong national defense and effective law enforcement, and the legitimacy of a government role in protecting traditional values. In the field of law, I disagree strenuously with the usurpation by the judiciary of decision-making authority that should be exercised by the branches of government responsible to the electorate. When I first became interested in government and politics during the 1960’s, the greatest influences on my views were the writings of William F. Buckley, Jr., in The National Review, and Barry Goldwater’s 1964 campaign. In college, I developed a deep interest in constitutional law, motivated in large part by disagreement with Warren Court decisions, particularly in the areas of criminal procedure, the Establishment Clause, and reapportionment."

WOW! Judge Alito should be confirmed to be an associate justice of the Supreme Court on this brash statement alone.


The other memo deals with a 1985 abortion case. Exaggerated claims and raucous rhetoric are emanating forth from the opposition relative to this memo because it addresses the liberal litmus test, the solitary issue for which they and their extremist supporters focus on for Supreme Court appointments: legalized abortion. As a lawyer in the Regan justice department, Alito argued for chipping away at abortion rights as a strategy for reforming this flawed judicial precedent. Alito’s argument was consistent with the stated policy of Ronald Reagan and the Reagan justice department. The defective 1973 decision which has been so widely debated since that time, made all policy choices about abortion matters of constitutional law. The court removed the issue from the electoral process. All conservatives have believed before and after Roe that the issue should be settled through the political process since obviously the constitution does not explicitly address abortion, or the contrived right to privacy upon which the court based the original decision. While the liberals and the mainstream media dwell upon the necessity of upholding the considerably blemished and poorly reasoned decision of Roe versus Wade, there are other great issues of significance before the court today, and there will doubtless be immense issues to be decided by the court in the future.

Moreover, the credibility of Senator Charles Schumer is more of a question than that of Judge Alito. Charles Fried, solicitor General during Ronald Reagan’s second term, has challenged the veracity of the complainants and their supporters. Mr. Fried states that Alito has no formal role in writing the brief in the case, and that the memo should never have been released in the first place. Fried challenges Senator Schumer directly in the following statement.

"I have never head of anyone who worked in the solicitor general's office who would list all the cases where they wrote memos," Mr. Fried said. "There are hundreds of these. It's just absurd. It's one of these typical cases, and I'm afraid Senator Schumer is guilty of this, that if you can't get someone on the merits, you bring up some phony lack of candor argument. He should be ashamed of himself, but he is shameless. And you can quote me on that."

Interestingly, this memo was not the result of a Bush administration release. The memo came from the National archives were the Clinton Administration had dumped it some years ago. Brian Maguire of the New York Sun speculates that the documents were released by the Clinton administration as a preemptive strike against any potential Republican appointee for the Supreme Court. The transparency of Senators Kennedy and Schumer has never been more obvious as they fight to protect ROE at the expense of every other possible ruling.

Even Paul Begala, the notorious prince of the strident liberals, said it is not advisable for the democrats in the senate to “act as if the Supreme Court is the abortion court.” The normally frantic Begala insisted that Alito has withheld critical information from the committee, while saying that Senator (“Uncle Teddy”) Kennedy is “smarter than the average bear” and that Senator Kennedy and others will succeed in discrediting Sam Alito by using a range of issues to frame his lack of suitability for the court.

Senator Arlen Specter continued his walk on the balance beam today and held a news conference claiming that he was trying to avoid another Harriet Miers scandal. Specter, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and an avid supporter of abortion rights, found it necessary to assure the Washington press corps that Judge Alito has a high regard for the precedent of Roe versus Wade. To some degree, Specter may have done Alito a favor in the war of perceptions. Specter seemed to stand tall for fairness and dignity in the process of confirming Judge Alito. Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., said Alito had told him in a private meeting that "with respect to his personal views on a woman's right to choose ... that is not a matter to be considered in the deliberation on a constitutional issue of a woman's right to choose. The judicial role is entirely different." The sequence of events - the private meeting followed by Specter's news conference - came after days of controversy sparked by 20-year-old documents in which Alito expressed his opposition to abortion in stark terms.

Regardless of the strategy employed by the left, Judge Alito is still very likely to be confirmed. Republicans appear to have at least fifty of their fifty-five votes secured. The liberals in the senate are likely to increase the volume and intensity of their speechifying in the weeks ahead. Having failed in their harsh criticism of President Bush on the Iraq war, these shrill opponents of Judge Alito’s nomination will stop at nothing to smear Judge Alito and deny him the opportunity to replace Reagan’s biggest mistake, Sandra Day O’Conner on the Supreme Court.

As Always, read many great Saturday links at the political teen.
Read more Saturday stories at Stop The ACLU
The Mudville Gazette is always wonderful!